Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quit nagging the smokers, will ya?
PhillyBurbs.com ^ | 11-18-04 | J.D. Mullane

Posted on 11/19/2004 5:35:36 AM PST by SheLion

Today is the day we set aside each year to badger, harass and pester that marginalized subculture of Americans, the Doorway People.

You know the Doorway People. They stand in doorways at work or at the mall smoking cigarettes because lighting up in mixed company has become as distasteful as nose-picking.

Yes, today marks the 27th anniversary of the Great American Smokeout, sponsored by the American Cancer Society, where modern incarnates of pinch-mouthed prohibitionists attempt to further ghettoize smokers.

Now, it's not that I think smoking is good. I have friends who smoke. I wish they didn't. On average, they will trade 10 years of their lives to enjoy their habit. But we're all grownups. Smoking is their demon and I have enough of my own demons to wrestle with.

But, unlike anti-smoking zealots, I sympathize with smokers.

That's because I was a smoker. When I quit for good in 1996, I was burning through 2 1/2 packs a day. I ditched the habit because each time I coughed, my lungs rattled as if someone had backed into metal trash cans.

Still, I loved every puff. I still miss it. In fact, I still have nicotine cravings.

So I'm sympathetic to smokers and believe they should be free to enjoy their addiction, which, last I checked, remains legal. Which is why I dislike the anti-smoking scolds. They are trying to criminalize smoking.

From New York City to Dallas, from Toledo, Ohio, to Eugene, Ore., anti-smoking zealots have racked up successful campaigns to ban smoking in bars and restaurants, the last bastion of peace and acceptance for smokers.

Eventually, the anti-smoking "movement" will have won enough smoking bans in enough cities in enough states to introduce national no-smoking legislation, said Zoe Mitchell, co-founder of Ban the Ban, which recently defeated efforts to enact similar no-smoking legislation in Washington, D.C.

"Ultimately, their goal is to make it a national issue based on their success at the local level," she said.

Anti-smokers say they're acting in the best interest of public health.

They say all those smokers burden the healthcare system with their cigarette-related maladies. It costs all of us more in healthcare premiums, they say.

Nonsense. Smokers die sooner than most of us nonsmokers, never collecting a cent from Social Security, which they've paid for decades.

Also, smokers pay outrageous cigarette taxes on each pack of smokes, which pours billions of dollars annually into government coffers.

At best, the money argument is a wash.

When an anti-smoking nut steps into a place like the Puss N' Boots Tavern in Fairless Hills, all they see is the blue-gray cloud of smoke hovering over the patrons crowded around the bar.

When I walk into the Boot, I see it differently.

I see a local cop who's seen more than his fair share of tragedy.

Or an emergency room nurse who was up to her elbows in blood just a few hours before.

Or a construction guy who's sacrificed years of Saturdays to work overtime so he could save for his kid's college tuition.

Or a middle-aged father worried about his son, who's fighting the war.

These are the good people the anti-smoking zealots want to stigmatize as public health leeches.

And if they accomplish their goal, they won't go away.

They will persecute the overweight, stigmatize SUV drivers and haul into court those who don't recycle.

They've got the money and the time and the lawyers.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: antismokers; bans; butts; cigarettes; fda; individualliberty; lawmakers; maine; niconazis; professional; prohibitionists; pufflist; regulation; rinos; senate; smoking; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 641-647 next last
To: winker; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Madame Dufarge; Gabz; MeeknMing; steve50; KS Flyover; ...
Lets make a Deal Ya'll don't smoke and I won't... FART!

Wink! Fart away! We shall never meet so my smoking won't bother you and you can fart to high heaven. Like smelling your own farts do you? heh!

521 posted on 11/20/2004 6:32:37 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
Go ahead and fart if you want to. Its your right and I wouldn't think of trying to get your right to fart banned by the government.

I bet he's the type that farts in bed and pulls the covers up over his head so he can enjoy the aroma. LOL!

Not hardly the kind of man I'd want to be around anyway. haha

522 posted on 11/20/2004 6:33:59 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Doc On The Bay
AS A GUESS, I would BET that the "Second-Hand Smoke from an "Oak-Burning Wood Stove" would be MORE DANGEROUS than "Second-Hand Cigarette Smoke!!"

Goodness.  I live in northern Maine and have a huge wood furnace in the basement along with 9 cords of wood for this season.  Dirtiest heat I ever had but still a good warm heat. But it's dirty, believe me.  I have been using a wood furnace since moving to northern Maine and I'm still going strong.  Even by me smoking........

523 posted on 11/20/2004 6:36:50 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Stu Cohen
Isn't that the whole idea behind the "War on Some Drugs when Used by Certain People"?

Don't forget about Big Pharm. They want everyone to stop smoking so they can get the SMOKER'S money!


524 posted on 11/20/2004 6:41:15 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: armydoc
I was replying to Shelion, who is arguing that SMOKING doesn't cause cancer.

You're full of chit.  I NEVER said that.  Do NOT put words into my mouth.

525 posted on 11/20/2004 6:43:21 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: armydoc; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Madame Dufarge; Gabz; MeeknMing; steve50; KS Flyover; ...
Once again:

I was replying to Shelion, who is arguing that SMOKING doesn't cause cancer.

You're full of chit.  I NEVER said that.  Do NOT put words into my mouth.

526 posted on 11/20/2004 6:44:32 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: HomeschoolGenealogistMom
I am just a person with asthma triggered by even small amounts of smoke.

Ok. How about THESE studies? 

Asthma: The Politics of Blaming Tobacco Smoke

Contrary to what the EPA would have us believe, medical researchers are increasingly putting the blame for asthma on our modern day obsession with cleanliness, not on tobacco smoke. For further discussion on this, see "Smoke and the Asthma Epidemic: A Reality Check," by Wanda Hamilton.

Cold air and exercise trigger asthma

The key triggers for asthma attacks are cold air, exercise, the menstrual cycle and aspirin, according to a new study.

Asthma: The Politics of Blaming Tobacco Smoke

Contrary to what the EPA would have us believe, medical researchers are increasingly putting the blame for asthma on our modern day obsession with cleanliness, not on tobacco smoke. For further discussion on this, see "Smoke and the Asthma Epidemic: A Reality Check," by Wanda Hamilton.


527 posted on 11/20/2004 6:54:04 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: timestax

Cute guys. You sure they are smoking 'regular' cigarettes here. LOL!


528 posted on 11/20/2004 6:55:59 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; HomeschoolGenealogistMom
Ok. How about THESE studies? 

Asthma: The Politics of Blaming Tobacco Smoke

Contrary to what the EPA would have us believe, medical researchers are increasingly putting the blame for asthma on our modern day obsession with cleanliness, not on tobacco smoke. For further discussion on this, see "Smoke and the Asthma Epidemic: A Reality Check," by Wanda Hamilton.

Cold air and exercise trigger asthma

The key triggers for asthma attacks are cold air, exercise, the menstrual cycle and aspirin, according to a new study.

Asthma: The Politics of Blaming Tobacco Smoke

Contrary to what the EPA would have us believe, medical researchers are increasingly putting the blame for asthma on our modern day obsession with cleanliness, not on tobacco smoke. For further discussion on this, see "Smoke and the Asthma Epidemic: A Reality Check," by Wanda Hamilton.

529 posted on 11/20/2004 6:57:58 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor
Cigarette smoke doesn't bother me much with my asthma but if something is burning in my oven or I get in the smoke at a cookout, I might have an asthma attack and have to use my inhaler or sometimes the smoke just makes me feel like throwing up.

Ok. How about THESE studies? 

Asthma: The Politics of Blaming Tobacco Smoke

Contrary to what the EPA would have us believe, medical researchers are increasingly putting the blame for asthma on our modern day obsession with cleanliness, not on tobacco smoke. For further discussion on this, see "Smoke and the Asthma Epidemic: A Reality Check," by Wanda Hamilton.

Cold air and exercise trigger asthma

The key triggers for asthma attacks are cold air, exercise, the menstrual cycle and aspirin, according to a new study.

Asthma: The Politics of Blaming Tobacco Smoke

Contrary to what the EPA would have us believe, medical researchers are increasingly putting the blame for asthma on our modern day obsession with cleanliness, not on tobacco smoke. For further discussion on this, see "Smoke and the Asthma Epidemic: A Reality Check," by Wanda Hamilton.

530 posted on 11/20/2004 7:00:24 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: winker
OH! waiter; another double helping of BEANS por favor!

Eat beans to your heart's content my friend. And thank GOD I don't have to live close to you!

531 posted on 11/20/2004 7:03:21 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: winker
OH! waiter; another double helping of BEANS por favor!

Please!  Eat about a dozen of jalapeno peppers to go along with that. heh!  Not that I want you to suffer but maybe while those hot peppers are coming back out, you will be leaving the smokers alone. LOL!

532 posted on 11/20/2004 7:05:21 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: dzzrtrock
"....My friend who MAY someday kill me...."

Hullo? you don't see the glaring flaw in your choice of "friends"?

I've never considered someone who ws actively trying to kill me every time i was around them a "friend"

Ah. What post are you talking about?  I never said anything about a friend that MAY kill me?  huh? Show me the post where you think I said that.

533 posted on 11/20/2004 7:07:18 AM PST by SheLion (God bless and protect our troops. I love them one and all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

Where did I say anything about banning anything?


534 posted on 11/20/2004 7:11:00 AM PST by ShandaLear (Vindication in mine, sayeth the Dubya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Your use and my use of the term "recreational drug use" apparently are 2 different things.

Apparently.

People are smoking tobacco outside, in the open air that is also being shared by exhaust fumes from numerous sources, only because some people that didn't like the smell were able to get the highly financed junk scientists to convince the corruptible and gullible lawmakers to do it.

Reminds you of "Reefer Madness", doesn't it?

And remember, in many, if not most, public places, you still can't drink alcohol (a legal drug) outside in the open air, even though it emits no unhalable by-product.

So, there is precedent for this ... and nobody seemed to be upset about it. Therefore, this is a natural progression. When they came for the marijuana and alcohol users I didn't speak because I didn't use marijuana or alcohol, etc, etc. I'm sure you know this theory. Eventually your drug of choice is going to come onto the radar. Frankly, i'm surprised it took this long for tobacco.

But heck, I'm a reasonable gal, so I'll go with your idea of "recreational drugs" and suggest that the use of tobacco in an establishment created for the use of alcohol or caffeine shouldn't be a problem, should it? It solves the problem of tobacco use outside, doesn't it?

Of course. No arguement here.

But I'll take it even a step further, let all the business owners make the decision. WOW, that's such a novel idea, isn't it?

Maybe. Some might argue that OSHA regulations should be done away with, and if the workers don't like the conditions they could just quit. Some might argue that if offices aren't wheelchair-accessible, then disabled persons should just find another job. If your boss is sexually harassing you, quit, and find another job. Business should be able to create whatever work environments they want.

I'm not entirely sure I agree with doing away with all workplace regulations.

Now, if the business is specifically designated as a "Place for people to use and enjoy recreational drugs", I agree with you 100%. It should be up to them whether they wish to engage in that business.

535 posted on 11/20/2004 8:06:23 AM PST by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

I am a considerate smoker. But lately it is a test of my will!


536 posted on 11/20/2004 8:10:29 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a coward and a terrorist sympathizer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; winker
Wink! Fart away! We shall never meet so my smoking won't bother you and you can fart to high heaven. Like smelling your own farts do you? heh!

LOLOL!



537 posted on 11/20/2004 8:11:07 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
You know what? I have been fighting this war on the smokers for years. I have done more research and can provide more links then you can shake a stick at. You say that "I wouldn't be interested? Heh! You have NO idea, Stu.

Good. Then you are aware of the precice mechanism of action and the receptor sites in the brain that tobacco byproducts bind to and are aware that it is actually a polydrug phenomenon.

I wonder how you could know this and still come to the conclusion that is is not addicting? *shrug* Maybe growing up in a smoking household and smoking while pregnant effects the logic circuit of one's synapses. I guess that needs to be further studied.

I still resent you calling tobacco a DRUG.

You resent me calling a drug ... a drug? Would you rather I called it a red crested hummingbird?

Last I heard, drugs are illegal unless a legal prescription is provided.

Well, "last you heard" was wrong. That's not even remotely true. Have you ever been to a drugstore, SheLion? I don't know who you've been talking to. Some drugs are illegal, others are perfectly legal, and some are legal but controlled.

You and you alone are making me WISH I had a few drugs right now. heh!

Run down to the store and pick some up.

How about I get a prescription for Valium and get all la la in the head then get behind the wheel of my big ole SUV. Would you be happy then, Stu baby?

No. Uh, SheLion baby (if we must use pet names for each other).

Listen. You don't have to smoke.

Thank you.

You don't even have to be around smokers.

Actually, unless I never leave the house, I do have to be around them.

God knows, the highly paid anti-smokers have provided places now where you don't even have to BE around SHS.

Some places, yes.

Not that it will hurt you, but God forbid, should you ever SMELL it.

Some people it hurts, some people it doesn't.

538 posted on 11/20/2004 8:19:52 AM PST by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; winker

I wonder if you can tell when winker farts.


539 posted on 11/20/2004 8:32:19 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Kevin Sites is a coward and a terrorist sympathizer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Stu dear.

Aw, I preferred it when you called me "baby".

By recreational drugs. Do you mean pot, ecstasy, oxycontin? (I can't spell it never took it).

By recreational drugs, I meant all drugs used for recreational purposes, and not medical, purposes. A comprehensive list would be difficult to publish in one post.

Those Stu, while maybe you classify them as 'recreational' are illegal.

You picked out two drugs that are illegal, and one that is illegal without a prescription. This hardly encompases the list of drugs that are used recreationally. And if the "anti-smokers" accomplish outlawing tobacco, as some suggest that they are ... then I guess you're gonna have to quit. Because then you'd be using an illegal drug instead of a legal drug. And that would be wrong.

Other drugs..........like prescription drugs? Those are legal when a prescription is given by a Doctor when a patient needs these medications.

Yes, thank you for stating the obvious.

Alcohol and tobacco products are not drugs.

To the contrary. They are. The fact that they are legal does not mean that they are not drugs. There are also more closely regulated than other drugs. A 15 year old can legally walk into a store and buy a bottle of aspirin, but not alcohol or cigarettes.

Alcohol is legal, even though it numbs the brain.

Alcohol is only legal when consumed on private property or when used in designated places (usually requiring a permit of some kind). Most people cannot walk down the street drinking alcohol. Hence the "brown bags".

That's because it's a drug. You claim that it "numbs the brain", then go on to say it is not a drug. Your position seems to contradict itself.

Tobacco and smoking cigarettes does not have the 'drug' effect of anything I listed above.

Different drugs have different effects. That's why there is more than one drug.

When I smoke a plain old cigarette, I'm not inclined to start stripping my clothes off and dancing on a table, or grabbing a gun and run outside to shoot at cars.

I think I speak for everyone when I say that I am very glad to hear hat.

Most people who smoke marijuana don't have the above urge either, but likely you still consider it a drug.

It might be noted that Alcohol does indeed cause some of the above behaviour. More alchol-related crimes are committed each year in the U.S. than all other drugs combined.

540 posted on 11/20/2004 8:33:17 AM PST by Stu Cohen (Press '1' for English)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 641-647 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson