Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors turn focus to Scott Peterson's fishing boat
Court TV ^ | 11/8/04 | Harriet Ryan

Posted on 11/09/2004 5:28:34 AM PST by runningbear

Jurors turn focus to Scott Peterson's fishing boat

REDWOOD CITY, Calif. — Jurors in Scott Peterson's capital murder trial want to see the boat the fertilizer salesman allegedly used to dump his wife's body in the San Francisco Bay, according to two sources close to the case.

The panel wrote a note to Judge Alfred Delucchi Friday requesting an inspection of the 14-foot aluminum Gamefisher Peterson took out on the bay Dec. 24, 2002, the day he reported his wife, Laci, missing.

The sources confirmed to Court TV that the boat will be brought to the courthouse and jurors will see it Monday.

The request to see the boat came as the panel completed a third day of deliberations without reaching a verdict. The six men and six women have weighed evidence for nearly 19 hours. They will spend the weekend sequestered at a hotel, but they are not permitted to discuss the case until they return to the jury room at about 8 a.m. Monday.

Story continues ........


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; conner; dontubelievemyalibi; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; sonkiller; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441-458 next last
To: bonfire

We're irresistable, once we get going. ;-D

Besides, this is no worse than news of Arafat's death and nondeath, and Kerry wanting to run again in '08 after taking an active role in the Senate.

I think we slipped into Monty Python world today. I just hope Sharon finds a bit of humor somewhere in this to see her through.

Pinz


161 posted on 11/09/2004 11:52:23 AM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

It is PROBABLY #6!! Justin's pal.
----

I was just thinking the same thing.... I'll bet he has a boat like Snott's... I'll bet he's the NG that was in the boat yesterday. I'll bet he told the rest of the jury all about his recent fishing/dumping experiment. OH LORD...


162 posted on 11/09/2004 11:53:09 AM PST by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

I agree....Abrams pointed out that all the things that they asked for were associated with pre-meditation.


163 posted on 11/09/2004 11:53:20 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Searching4Justice; All
You all go over and read the LKL transcript from last night. Here's some of what Falconer was shooting off his mouth about:

FALCONER: I did. I'm sorry. Nancy, I think you got six wrong. I think if there's somebody holding out stubborn I think you're going to be surprised at who it is.

GRACE: Oh, really, and how would you know that, Mr. Falconer unless you have been in touch with number 6.

FALCONER: Actually I sat next to him in court...

KING: Maybe he knows him better than you.

FALCONER: Yes, I know him a lot better than you...

GRACE: Maybe or maybe you have been talking to him.

FALCONER: I don't think -- no, Nancy, I haven't been talking to him but I did sit next to him for four weeks and I do know him better than you, and I don't think he's who you're thinking.

DIMITRIUS: I'll come to Justin's defense.

KING: How so?

DIMITRIUS: I'll come to Justin's defense. I don't think it's juror number deep six. I think that there's another juror that everyone's been talking about that would be no surprise to anybody who that individual is.

FALCONER: She knows exactly who I'm talking about.

KING: Since that's the question, why can't you tell us?

DIMITRIUS: Well, everybody's referring to him -- I believe his number is juror number 8.

FALCONER: Exactly. Thank you very much.

GRACE: No way.

(CROSSTALK)

FALCONER: Hey, Nancy. Let me tell you this right now, too, and I'll say this right here that when everything does open up, there was complaints against juror number 8 from the other jurors. So this is not -- I've been watching your reporting and hearing what you've been saying. It's not been accurate.

GRACE: How long were you on the jury, Justin?

FALCONER: A lot longer than you were, Nancy.

GRACE: True. You got me on that one.

KING: Nancy, at least admit, admit that he may know them better than you.

GRACE: It hurts, but I think you're right.

164 posted on 11/09/2004 11:53:34 AM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Searching4Justice

Hi SJ. Your so right. It's always the tax payer isn't it? I hope the Judge just dismisses the Juror. A mistrial doesn't help anybody really.


165 posted on 11/09/2004 11:53:45 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

NO, I heard that CARDOZA will defend him next time. GAG ME!!


166 posted on 11/09/2004 11:54:57 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

Evidently that's an option---it depends what this juror did and if it was shared with the jury, I guess.

Oh, my Court TV is LIVE (that is rare) and Beth Karas says everyone is at lunch and this brouhaha might be over.

Maybe the judge has heard what he needs and will issue a ruling or he heard enough and ruled already in chambers. Stay tuned.


167 posted on 11/09/2004 11:55:27 AM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

If we get a new juror, it will be Strawberry Shortcake. They will need to start deliberating from the beginning when she comes on.

The sick lady needs to leave on Friday, which would mean another alternate (if they don't finish first), and starting over AGAIN.

We could still put Scott away, but Delucchi will need a long vacation afterwards.

Anybody know anything about the alternate after Shortcake? I've been listening to see if CTV has anything about this eventuality.

Pinz


168 posted on 11/09/2004 11:56:13 AM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave

Thanks....it's up now!


169 posted on 11/09/2004 11:57:15 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
How can they eat at a time like this??? ;o)
I must admit, I'm a little freaked right now, but I have to drive home from work.
By the time I get home I hope there is something more definitive..
BBSoon
170 posted on 11/09/2004 11:57:48 AM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Lunchbreak....good, I can get the laundry done!


171 posted on 11/09/2004 11:58:16 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: bonfire; runningbear; Howlin
I just noticed that this thread was moved to SBR...
this is the first time in 2 years..wazzup with that???
172 posted on 11/09/2004 12:00:07 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

We had a Juror here (actually in Vancouver), who SLEPT with one of the defendants in a Gang style multiple murder and then she voted not guilty. She was CHARGED and Went to Jail for JURY TAMPERING!! They really need to do this here if it's the case. A good example may prevent such awful stuff in the future. This is really serious for a Juror to do that.


173 posted on 11/09/2004 12:00:14 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

OMG - WHAT??? Arafat is STILL hanging on?


174 posted on 11/09/2004 12:01:36 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz

IF the Juror who did his own research actually admitted this to the other Jurors he's too STOOOOOOOPID to be a Juror!!


175 posted on 11/09/2004 12:03:31 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O; Admin Moderator

I'd like to know why this one is in the SBR and the other two that have just been posted are still in the News forum.


176 posted on 11/09/2004 12:05:01 PM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez

I heard this morning that the Judge, IF he needs to grab an alternate, may make a random selection. Both sides Lawyers have a say here. Boy I hope it's not #8!! He was a G, I'm sure of it!! Anyway, Falconer, to know so much, HAD to be talking to Juror #6. In fact, that was made known to Judge Delucchi during Closing Arguments.


177 posted on 11/09/2004 12:08:03 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

That's what they say.

Have you EVER?

However, one freeper pointed out it's kind of fun to hear everyday "Arafat has died".

hehehe


178 posted on 11/09/2004 12:09:47 PM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

This is exactly the kind of death he deserves... no dignity, no finality, and we get to laugh at his expense! lol

Pinz


179 posted on 11/09/2004 12:14:31 PM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage

That's encouraging, that they can choose alternates. We only have 3 left, though, right?

I've avoided any program with Justin since the day he was let go. He's a waste of oxygen. His bud, #6 sounds the same.

I wouldn't put it past JoEllan or Justin to still be spinning for Geragos, either.

Pinz


180 posted on 11/09/2004 12:19:49 PM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441-458 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson