Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: More blood in the news cries out for saner gun laws
Chicago S-T ^ | 28 sept 2016

Posted on 09/28/2016 4:02:59 AM PDT by rellimpank

Three important news stories this week, taken together, cry out for saner gun laws in Illinois — beginning with tougher penalties for gun crimes.

In the first story, a man charged with shooting and killing another man near Millennium Park on Saturday was reported to have a criminal record that should have precluded him from even being on the street. The suspect, Paul Pagan, 32 had been arrested 39 times and was twice convicted for pointing a gun during an argument. He has convictions for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, reckless conduct, marijuana possession and possession of a stolen motor vehicle. He had a warrant out for his arrest. Yet he was back on the street, allegedly with a gun.

In the second story, the FBI reported on Monday that violent crime in the U.S. was up 4 percent last year and that murder was up 12.8 percent in cities. Violent crime is a Chicago crisis, but we are not alone.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicago.suntimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: banglsit; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Darksheare
More thug rioting calls out for saner speech laws. Wonder how the editorial writer would like that.

Well, you MIGHT be able to convince me that keeping people who have been arrested 39 times ON THE STREET might call for saner 5th Amendment laws.

21 posted on 09/28/2016 4:42:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (MSM ignoring Hillary's health until forced, shows us they are the MPM: Ministry of Propaganda Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

The only ‘sane’ gun laws people like this want are TOTAL GUN BAN

Their idiocy about what would happen and what has happened in the past is apparent.

They only care about getting rid of guns a nd are oblivious to the proven results of such gun bans in the past.

i.e.
1) criminals become the ONLY people with guns
2) governments have turned into toatlitarian dictatorships
3) Private citzens are defnseless agaist 1 and 2


22 posted on 09/28/2016 4:45:14 AM PDT by Mr. K (<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/1adpjl"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/1adpjl.jpg" title="made at im)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Because a criminal who broke the law by having a gun will obey ‘saner’ gun laws.


23 posted on 09/28/2016 4:50:45 AM PDT by Mr. K (<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/1adpjl"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/1adpjl.jpg" title="made at im)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Here in Texas we have more guns and less gun laws than Chicago, or any other DemonRat ran Socialist Utopia.

We don't have any less scumbags and criminals than they do...

We just lock ours up and/or execute them.

24 posted on 09/28/2016 4:59:44 AM PDT by Feckless (The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Carry a card?
The hell with that, Chip them. Like we do dogs.


25 posted on 09/28/2016 5:08:29 AM PDT by Kozak (ALLAH AKBAR = HEIL HITLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Take guns away from Democrats. Crime problem solved


26 posted on 09/28/2016 5:12:04 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrow107
> I would think that putting more guns on the street would make better sense, I mean - isn’t that what the liberals are telling us concerning muslums immigration? Bringing in more muslums does not equate into a higher risk of spontaneous jihad, so they tell us. It actually is a good thing - so they tell us. So, more guns would actually be a good thing using that way of thinking. See, we can agree with liberals about some (1) things - more guns = safer.

That ones going to sting. Great point...lol

27 posted on 09/28/2016 5:14:11 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
In the second story, the FBI reported on Monday that violent crime in the U.S. was up 4 percent last year and that murder was up 12.8 percent in cities.

which makes ILLary a liar during the debates. I wonder if this was fact checked.
28 posted on 09/28/2016 5:17:55 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sima_yi

Remove Obama from office and I bet the mass shooting ps drop dramatically. Remove the Muslims and the acts of terrorism will drop like a rock. Take out Soros and a whole lot of problems will suddenly disappear worldwide.


29 posted on 09/28/2016 5:18:35 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

Giuliani presided over a disarmed city; I don’t want that system implemented on a wider scale. His approach to fighting crime was fine, but it was tailored to a locale where people couldn’t defend themselves.


30 posted on 09/28/2016 5:21:53 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

yada, yada, yada.


31 posted on 09/28/2016 5:23:33 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The dirty secret is that this violent felon had been arrested 39 times prior to committing murder in Chicago and the Illinois criminal justice system had allowed him back on the streets!

Illinois jails and prisons are revolving door institutions: no one serves full sentences; the death penalty has been abolished; judges are soft on criminals; Democratic politicians want to release more criminals to end mass incarceration due to systemic racism (no respect for jury trials that convicted the criminals). The bitter truth is that the crooked Illinois politicians do not want to pay to keep prisoners locked up because it costs about $150.00 per day, so they let’ em go.


32 posted on 09/28/2016 5:24:55 AM PDT by PBRCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sima_yi

“If only Chicago had strict gun laws...oh, wait.”.

Wondering if the 2nd Ammendment protects pressure cookers? Especially those high capacity cookers, the ones with the black handle? Nothing but people killers....


33 posted on 09/28/2016 5:40:25 AM PDT by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Someone needs to ask him, very directly, what part of "gun control" laws he can point to that actually work. Illinois has some of the toughest (if not the toughest) "gun control" laws in the Nation. How's that working out?

Anyone reading this who thinks "gun control" laws are a good idea - any lib lurkers out there et. al. Ask yourself one simple question: why would a criminal, determined to break numerous other laws (often up to and including murder) obey "gun control" laws? What rational basis is there for believing "gun control" laws will in any way impact crime?

It is pure fantasy - no, that's too kind. It is pure idiocy to believe "gun control" impacts criminals in any way. "Oh, I'm going to go out and steal, intimidate, and kill tonight...oh, hold-up, give me that other gun, this one's got too big of a magazine on it..." Really, do you think that has *ever* been said?

"Gun control" laws are a lie. They are never about public safety, they are all about controlling the law-abiding public and chipping away at our liberties. If any of you out there advocate for them - you are no American, you a loathsome socialist/fascist {expletive}.

34 posted on 09/28/2016 5:41:56 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Here’s a ‘sane gun law’:

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

What say we try it?


35 posted on 09/28/2016 5:44:50 AM PDT by NorthMountain (Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

More gun control.

Nothing in the editorial about thug control.

Same old same old anti-Second Amendment broadside.

Predictable like clockwork.


36 posted on 09/28/2016 6:11:06 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Papabear isn’t saying that felons already have that RFID, he’s proposing that they *ought* to. That way, cops could detect the RFID from their cruiser or while on foot patrol with a simple device. If a cop were to encounter a known felon who doesn’t have his/her chip on their person, their parole would be summarily revoked, the cop immediately arrests them and carts them away. That same RFID reader could be made available to gun shops and other places where felons shouldn’t go.

You could even have different kinds of chips, so that e.g. sex offenders could be differentiated from other types of criminal, and the areas they’re excluded from could be ringed with readers that can detect the sex offender chips.

It sounds very efficient and effective, but I can also see all kinds of potentials for abuse.


37 posted on 09/28/2016 6:29:49 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

“It is obvious that tough gun laws would stop the murders on Chicago streets.”

Anyone who makes that statement either has an IQ below room temperature or is a pathological liar.


38 posted on 09/28/2016 6:35:35 AM PDT by cgbg (Warning: This post has not been fact-checked by the Democratic National Committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

They aren’t using the laws they have currently.


39 posted on 09/28/2016 6:41:32 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Never a mention of morals or spiritual values that underpin a civil and peaceful society. Given the history of Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, we know that secular progressive values (redundant) lead to hell on earth.

Their government is god and they are blind to the limits of government. When government fails progressives have nothing to appeal to except more force. They cannot appeal to God, nor would they ever.


40 posted on 09/28/2016 8:43:15 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson