Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz Thinks Women Will Really Believe This
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | October 12, 2015 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 10/12/2015 2:11:07 PM PDT by Kaslin

RUSH: I'm telling you, Snerdley, do not discount this. We've been making this mistake now since the early nineties. The left will go out, the Democrats, somebody will say something just totally outrageous, like all these clowns that predicted the end of the earth in ten years if we didn't clean up the oceans, or name your prediction. Twenty years ago, or 40 years ago, if we didn't fix global warming in 20 years we weren't gonna be able to inhabit the East Coast, all of these things. Or take this food's gonna kill you, that food's gonna save you, people believe this stuff.

The latest example of that, I didn't get to it on Friday. Do you realize the serious nutritional consequences there have been to the government lying to you about not eating butter and not eating whole milk and avoiding cream? All of this, don't eat that stuff 'cause it's so high in fat, gonna clog your arteries, turns out to be just wrong, just dead wrong. There are no health consequences to eating butter instead of margarine. In fact, margarine may be worse now, given this, what is this, hydrogenated stuff.

But, you know, people have skim milk all the time, no whole milk, no cream, don't give me butter and so forth. Turns out that there's nothing wrong with it at all. It's just people have been lied to over and over and over, and they believe it. And people have actually been talked into believing that normal every day milk is gonna kill 'em, for crying out loud. And it never has been true.

Now, if you don't like it, that's fine. But people are avoiding it because they think it's gonna kill them, or shorten their life span. Same thing with butter. And they've just been lied to about it. But when the government says it, when the government proclaims it, that's why Democrats want control of the government. It has an automatic respect factor and credibility to it, even though the government makes most mistakes big-time, screws up everything it does so bad that new fixes are necessary that the government's said to be the only ones that can engage in. They just screw everything up and then they are the first ones people demand fix it, the people that made the mess in the first place. Because government has some automatic acceptability credibility to it that people do not want to think ill of the government.

So here comes Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz, and she's on CNN, and she's talking to Dana Bash, and Dana Bash didn't act like she was crazy when she heard this. So Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz, who, like Hillary Clinton, ought to have been laughed out of American politics years ago. Hillary Clinton, Trump's right, should be indicted, for crying out loud, and would be if she were a Republican. Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz, you know, you take what she says outside the political arena, she is sued into poverty for defamation and slander and you name it. The woman can't tell the truth about Republicans to save her life, but since she's in politics she's free to say whatever she wants to say.

So the Democrats have concocted, with the help of ABC News, this War on Women meme, and Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz, who still is the chairman of the Democrat National Committee. And, by the way, ask yourself, why is that? Supposedly she's this huge embarrassment. Supposedly she won't shut up. She makes these crazy, wacko statements. The reason they haven't gotten rid of her is that she is viewed to be effective in some places. And admit it, folks, you run into leftists all the time that believe the most cockamamie, crazy stuff you can't believe, they believe it, but they do, about us, I mean. They are so impressionable, it's not funny.

So here's Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz on CNN yesterday telling Dana Bash that all the remaining Republican presidential candidates are trying to out-Trump Donald Trump. They're saying, "Yeah, let's just kick women, let's just kick 'em and the immigrants out of the country." Now, when did women end up in this? See, already the Democrats have made people believe that Republicans want to get rid of all the immigrants, when all anybody's interested in here is preserving America and American culture and assimilation and legal immigration.

What everybody's up in arms about is no end in sight to open borders and illegal immigration, but the Democrats have convinced people that the Republicans want to find every immigrant there is and send 'em home. Now Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz wants to throw women in the mix, and Dana Bash just sits there and nods?

Now, I'm not saying everybody that watches this stuff is gonna believe it, but we cannot count on the fact that people are gonna hear this and laugh at it and think that this woman's an idiot. There are gonna be people that believe it. I don't know what percentage of Democrat voters, but I'm telling you it's probably bigger than you think. No, she didn't jump the shark with that. She's jumped the shark I don't know how many previous comments over the years. And, by the way, you can't even find -- Drudge had this up, I saw this, it was a lead item on Drudge before the program started, you can't find it on Drudge now. So I don't know if it's taken down because it's been denied or what have you, or if it's so outrageous. I have no idea.

It's not possible for Democrats to jump the shark. That's my whole point. It isn't possible for that to happen. Here's what she said. I don't know if I've got the sound bite of this or not. Let me just read it, and if I do have it, I'll find it and play it. Here's what she said: "I believe that any one of our candidates will stand in stark contrast, when it comes to the priorities of the American people and how they’re going to make their decision on who they’re going to vote for for President, to any of the Republican candidates. The Republicans are trying to out-right wing each other. Look, between the fifteen Republican candidates who are left -- all of whom are trying to out-Trump Donald Trump -- by saying, 'Yeah let’s kick women. Let’s kick them and immigrants out of this country. Let’s take away health care from women.' ... Yes, I think any of the candidates on our side of the aisle ... will be chosen and eventually elected as the 45th president of the United States of America because of that contrast."

Do you think that some of these Lena Dunham types are not gonna believe that? Even if they don't believe it, they're gonna join the chorus and say it, because these people know that there are Democrat voters who will believe it, and they'll spread the word on Twitter. It will become a whole Twitter theme. Republicans want to kick women out. By all rights, the War on Women is as silly as this, isn't it? The idea that a whole political party is at war with over half the population, and yet they've made that stick.

So if you've already established that the Republicans are engaged in a War on Women, then isn't it natural that the Republicans want to kick all the women out of the country along wall the illegal immigrants? If you are a mind-numbed robot, brain-dead, low-information, typical, average Democrat, and you already believe the impossible, you already believe some of the craziest wacko things in the world that none of us can believe they believe, why would they not believe this? (interruption) Well, okay, right, even Republican needs women and Republicans like women, so how does the War on Women work, then? You denying to me that the War on Women works for these people? As a fundraiser technique or as a scare tactic technique?

It's no different than the way the Democrats used to always tell senior citizens the Republicans were gonna kick them out of their homes. Who would believe that? And it's not that they bought it. It's they couldn't take the chance. So they had to vote Democrat to assure themselves, 'cause they knew the Democrats wouldn't kick 'em out of their homes. Maybe they didn't really believe the Republicans would, but they couldn't take the chance of voting Republican. That's how it works.

Anyway, I'm just saying 20 years ago something like this, we would have the biggest laugh. And we still could, but it's a sobering thing because I can envision the idiots that believe this. The Julias, by the way. Remember that ad Obama ran, this Julia woman who can't get out of bed every day without a government program? And can't leave her government apartment every day without a government transportation card? And can't eat every day without her government food stamp? And can't get back home without her government transportation card? And can't tend to her five flowers in her little garden without some sort of government program?

And they ran and promoting that kind of lifestyle? We thought, "This is a great ad. They're telling everybody they want the government to totally run their lives." Then we find out that a whole lot of Democrat women thought it was a great ad, that it really captured them and their lives. Look, folks, it just illustrates there's no common ground to be had here. And there's no grabbing these people, you know, theoretically, figuratively by the shoulders and saying, "Hey, wake up, wake up, wake up." These people are to be defeated and rendered in the minority.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Okay. I got someone sending me a note, "Rush, the Republicans are the party that gave women the right to vote, just like it was the Republicans that ended slavery." So? You really think the low-information crowd, even if you could convince them of that, is gonna be moved by it? "You mean the Republicans were the ones that gave the women the right to vote?" Yeah. "Well, that was back when, like the 1700s? Screw that. Look at way they're treating women now," would be the reaction you would get.

And then you'd tell 'em, "Do you realize it was the Republican Party that was founded on the basis of ending slavery and Abraham Lincoln was the president during the Civil War?" "Well, maybe, but that was then and this is now. You can't find a single Republican that doesn't hate African-Americans today," and that's what you would get. All that historical stuff, the truth, not a factor. Face it, folks, that's why so many people are frustrated with -- well, not just politics, a whole lot of other aspects of life. None of those things are taught in our public school system anyway. I mean, I bet you that the whole women getting the right to vote thing in public schools today probably implies that Republicans were the opponents.

There's no question that public education today continues this folly that it was the Republicans who were opposed -- I'll give you another example. It's right out of the news today. On Sunday the New York Times had this huge story that 158 families in America are responsible for funding over half of the money spent on presidential campaigns. And guess what? They all are Republican, so it said. It did not mention any of the wealthy Hollywood liberal Democrats. Do you know that the family that owns Hyatt hotels is big socialist lib Democrat? All of Wall Street, take your pick, any Wall Street firm, nine out of 10 of 'em. And the people that work there, multimillionaires giving to the Democrats, not one of them.

This story was about eight or nine families that live in River Oaks in Houston, and then the Koch brothers in there, some people that live in Indian Creek down near Miami, which was said to be the richest street in America. And the reason for the story is to continue the myth that it's the Republicans who are rich and Big Business, when all of that has been taken over by the Democrats. The Democrat Party is the bedmate now of big Wall Street, Big Pharma, and Big Money. That's why Bernie Sanders is not gonna be permitted to get the Democrat nomination.

But the New York Times just ran a totally bogus story about who it is that's paying for, funding, underwriting presidential campaigns. They tried to make it out that 158 American families are running the American presidency and they all happen to be Republican. You know, nobody's supposed to stop and say, "Well, if that's true, how'd Obama win twice in a row?" You're not supposed to ask that question when you read the story. It's no different in the public education system today, you can still find implications that it was the Democrat Party that ended slavery and it was the Democrat Party that protects African-Americans to this day, when in fact the Democrat Party was the biggest opponent to civil rights laws back in the 1960s, and that all those Southern Democrats were segregationists.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Cookie got the sound bite here from Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz. This was yesterday on CNN's State of the Union. The last hour I read to you what Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz said. She was talking to Dana Bash, who didn't find anything odd about this at all. So Dana Bash says to Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz, who runs the Democrat National Committee -- you know, I called her blabbermouth. Wasserman is her middle name, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. I've been calling her "Blabbermouth" Schultz 'cause she never shuts up. Anyway, question: "Do you believe that Bernie Sanders could beat any Republican?"

SCHULTZ: I believe that any one of our candidates will stand in stark contrast, when it comes to the priorities of the American people and how they’re going to make their decision on who they’re going to vote for for President, to any of the Republican candidates. The Republicans are trying to out-right wing each other. Look, between the fifteen Republican candidates who are left -- all of whom are trying to out-Trump Donald Trump -- by saying, "Yeah let’s kick women. Let’s kick them and immigrants out of this country. Let’s take away health care from women."

RUSH: So there you have it. Let's kick women, let's kick immigrants, kick 'em out of the country, it's what the Republicans want to do. And there's Dana Bash nodding, hm-hm, hm-hm, right on, Debbie "Blabbermouth," right on. In the meantime, from TheHill.com, headline: "DNC Officer: I was disinvited after call for more debates." It turns out that Representative Tulsi Gabbard, or is it Tulsi? Yes, Tulsi Gabbard, and it might be Gabbard. I don't know. She's from Hawaii, a Democrat, a vice chairwoman, Democrat National Committee, says that she was disinvited from the debate on CNN tomorrow night after calling for more debates.

Yeah, she said this in the New York Times. "When I first came to Washington, one of the things that I was disappointed about was there’s a lot of immaturity and petty gamesmanship that goes on, and it kind of reminds me of how high school teenagers act. It’s very dangerous when we have people in positions of leadership who use their power to try to quiet those who disagree with them. When I signed up to be vice chair of the DNC, no one told me I would be relinquishing my freedom of speech and checking it at the door."

What happened was she said that we need to be doing more debates, not fewer. But Hillary wants fewer debates because the more Hillary appears, the worse it goes for her. I have made this observation I don't know how many times. Do not doubt me. When Hillary hasn't been heard from in a while, that's when her numbers go up. It's when she starts talking in public that her numbers start to go down. O'Malley and Bernie have wanted many more debates, and the DNC, which is in the tank for Hillary, has said no. So this woman, vice chair, comes out and they throw her out. Meanwhile, Debbie "Blabbermouth" Schultz says that it's the Republicans who want to kick women and immigrants out of the country. Well, they've kicked this women, their own woman, to the curb, which is how it works with these people. "I was disinvited after call for more debates."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Delaware; US: Florida; US: Maryland; US: Massachusetts; US: New York; US: Rhode Island; US: Vermont; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2016election; algore; arkansas; berniesanders; california; delaware; election2016; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; florida; hillaryclinton; hitlery; jimwebb; joebiden; johnkerry; lieawatha; lincolnchafee; lurch; martinomalley; maryland; massachusetts; nancypelosi; newyork; pruneface; rhodeisland; rushlimbaugh; taxevasion; tennessee; vermont; virginia; wassermanschultz

1 posted on 10/12/2015 2:11:07 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There’s a special corner in hell reserved for ppl like DWS, HRC, Pelosi, and pretty much every democrat.
God save us from these lunatics.


2 posted on 10/12/2015 2:21:19 PM PDT by No_More_Harkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Little Debbie always seems to have that "low flow" shower hair thing going, doesn't she?

Low Flow Hair

3 posted on 10/12/2015 2:21:40 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

To be fair I do want to kick SOME women out of the county, Debbie WS for instance.

She looks like she has fleas.


4 posted on 10/12/2015 2:28:24 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

whole milk is now good, ok

coming soon is extremism

Hand milked is better and eversomore healthful than that from machine milked stall imprisoned cows. the serum content of hand milked cows provides benefits not present in machine milk


5 posted on 10/12/2015 2:28:24 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Debbie Lard-Butt has it Bass-Ackwards again.

Republicans don’t want to kick women out of the country.
Most republican men are solidly heterosexual and adore women.

It’s the liberal faggots who have no use for women.

But of course, the liberal lesbians make up for it - at least partially.


6 posted on 10/12/2015 2:35:42 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The wise have stores of choice food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has. Proverbs 21:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

It really doesn’t have anything to do with hand milked vs machine milked. It has to do with all the crap they put in milk along with the pasteurization and the homogenization.

Go raw or don’t drink it at all. I would never drink that synthetic crap they call milk.


7 posted on 10/12/2015 2:42:33 PM PDT by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wasserman Shultz is crazed. What’s hilarious too is the discord she’s causing in the democrat party by refusing additional debates because she wants Hillary rubber stamped. What a loser.


8 posted on 10/12/2015 2:54:00 PM PDT by CCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Yeah I read that. My father was the bookkeeper of the brewery in my hometown in Germany. They had also a farm where they raised the wheat that they needed for the beer production and they also had some horses that they used for plowing the fields and bringing the hay in, plus delivering the beer right after the war. Then they got tractors and trucks. they did keep the horses though. They also had Milk cows which were kept in their stalls and an employee was milking them by hand every evening. Every employee got about a half of gal of milk a day to take home. My mother always emptied the milk into a special pot she had for it and boiled the milk. Oh and was that milk good after it had cooled down.


9 posted on 10/12/2015 2:55:46 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bert

“whole milk is now good, ok”

When Big Brother said that butter is bad, I asked myself, “How many margarine manufacturers paid how much money to how many gov’t bureaucrats to say that butter was no good?”

Likewise, for milk, pork, caffeine, etc. and all of the other things by the competing manufacturers that the gov’t has said that is ‘bad’ for you?


10 posted on 10/12/2015 3:01:45 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Man, guess it’s time to dump my eHarmony stock...


11 posted on 10/12/2015 3:07:37 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"That better be a flashlight in your pocket."


12 posted on 10/12/2015 3:18:07 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

“No Debbie, it’s just a roll of dimes”.


13 posted on 10/12/2015 3:42:58 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Hail Obambi, our Deer Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The millions of missing children.
Global cooling.
Global warming.
Islam is a religion of peace.
The Healthcare crisis.
Coal is evil.
Gun control.
There is unity in diversity.
Affirmative action.

Government lies never end.


14 posted on 10/12/2015 3:45:37 PM PDT by MrBambaLaMamba (Obama - "I will stand with the Muslims")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

90% of women are GULLIBLE as HELL!!! ONLY really Conservative have a BRAIN!


15 posted on 10/12/2015 3:53:52 PM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

90% of women are GULLIBLE as HELL!!! ONLY really Conservative have a BRAIN!


16 posted on 10/12/2015 3:53:54 PM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

17 posted on 10/12/2015 4:41:32 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Now of people started referring to her as “Drabby Washerwoman Schmutz”, a finding of fleas would be a certainty


18 posted on 10/12/2015 5:47:38 PM PDT by Postman (Flies landing on 0re0 know crap when they see it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This isn’t brain dead; it’s an announcement. If any Republican President rounds up illegals, there will be TV crews to focus on women in order to portray it as an act of cruelty (women and children first!). Why? Because illegal alien women produce anchor babies; i.e., future Democrat voters.


19 posted on 10/12/2015 6:27:24 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Despotism to liberalism: from Tiberius to Torquemada, and back again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson