Skip to comments.
Montana ballot measure urging equal number of men, women in Legislature passes first test
foxnews.com ^
| 03/14/2014
| n/a
Posted on 03/14/2014 11:08:14 AM PDT by massmike
Edited on 03/14/2014 11:31:48 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
03/14/2014 11:08:14 AM PDT
by
massmike
To: massmike
Coming soon to an employer near you...
2
posted on
03/14/2014 11:09:01 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
([CTRL-GALT-DELETE])
To: massmike
We need to do this at the national level.
If only to see Harry Reid forced to undergo a sex change in order to hang on to his job.
To: massmike
First step of mandating a certain number of homosexuals in the legislature.
4
posted on
03/14/2014 11:09:32 AM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
We need to do this at the national level. If only to see Harry Reid forced to undergo a sex change in order to hang on to his job. You forgot that Congress always exempts itself from the laws it shoves down our throats.
5
posted on
03/14/2014 11:09:59 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If Barack Hussein Obama entertains a thought that he does not verbalize, is it still a lie?)
To: massmike
Govern by feelings ... usually leads to very bad things.
6
posted on
03/14/2014 11:10:24 AM PDT
by
dartuser
To: massmike
More quota crap. Because that is the best measure of efficiency and effectiveness...
Shall this experiment be applied to all aspects of society? Could you just imagine the NFL having dual gender and race quotas? How about the NBA? Would the next category to be included be height?
7
posted on
03/14/2014 11:11:25 AM PDT
by
rjsimmon
(The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
To: massmike
Just wait. Next it will be “the military must be 50/50”
This country is in the iron grip of feminist lesbians
8
posted on
03/14/2014 11:11:39 AM PDT
by
Viennacon
To: massmike
From Casino:
Manager: "I want an equal number of blueberries in each muffin"
Head Chef: "Do know how long that would take?"
Manger: "I don't care, an equal number of blueberries in each muffin"
9
posted on
03/14/2014 11:11:48 AM PDT
by
AU72
To: massmike
I’d be interested in learning how this “equalizing” takes place. If not enough women are elected then what? Does someone appoint them over the wishes of the voters? And what about the “extra” men duly elected by the voters? Do they get booted? And who decides which ones get removed?
10
posted on
03/14/2014 11:12:32 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: massmike
That’s just weird. Will the bill’s sponsors be happy if they end up with 50 Sarah Palin style Republican women? What will they do if somebody runs unopposed and throws the headcount off?
I can’t see this being enacted.
11
posted on
03/14/2014 11:12:32 AM PDT
by
married21
( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
To: massmike
Wait.. I thought we were all Americans? ONE nation, ONE God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all?
To: massmike
dear Lord.......the whole world is going crazy....
I read this morning that pet clinics have had a steady increase in dog od's over weed being left out....
stupid idiot know nothing voters....
13
posted on
03/14/2014 11:13:08 AM PDT
by
cherry
To: massmike
This is just another way of thwarting the will of the electorate and expanding government, since women are far more likely to be big-government lovers than men.
There would be more women in the legislature if they got more votes. Since people won't vote for them, we must bypass them.
14
posted on
03/14/2014 11:13:34 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If Barack Hussein Obama entertains a thought that he does not verbalize, is it still a lie?)
To: Balding_Eagle
well, in this era of over 50 recognized genders on Facebook, I was wondering how exactly we will define, what is a man, and what is a woman, for purposes of this law.
And, the next step will be to accomodate the gay, lesbian, trans-whatever peoples. If you were born male but had the operation, are you now female? What if you didn’t yet have your operation?
This open a can of worms.
To: Mr. Jeeves
Coming soon to an employer near you...
It already has. In order to get EEO certification where I am, and thereby qualify to bid on public construction projects, we MUST maintain and report a specific percentage of union minorities and women. Those percentages vary by county based on minority population in that area.
The percentages must be maintained on a monthly basis to retain the certification.
To: Dilbert San Diego
This opens a can of worms.As we all suspect it was meant to do.
17
posted on
03/14/2014 11:18:01 AM PDT
by
Balding_Eagle
(Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Wait.. I thought we were all Americans? ONE nation, ONE God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all?
Ha Ha, Charade You Are!
- Pink Floyd
To: mmichaels1970
So, if 60% of the men who run win. 10% of them must be disqualified in favor of a woman who lost? The will of the people be damned.
19
posted on
03/14/2014 11:21:02 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: massmike
WTF? How could this possibly work?
What happens when after the election the winners would throw the ratio off, would the losers take office instead?
20
posted on
03/14/2014 11:21:28 AM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson