Skip to comments.Sheriff Joe set to release more Obama 'shockers'; TODAY Live Thread
Posted on 07/17/2012 9:08:06 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhostEdited on 07/17/2012 9:17:36 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigating Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have been promising more major revelations since their March 1 press conference, and now another event has been scheduled to unveil new information.
Arpaio told WND a press conference will be held July 17 at 2:30 p.m. local time at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Phoenix, Ariz. WND will once again provide live Web streaming of the event.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
thanks, will keep watch
IMHO the forged b.c. is cobbled together from a variety of sources. Who knows what or whose original document they used that had a "9" for race.
And what exactly is the penalty for letting someone see this patient log? Who do you think is going to sue the facility? Barack Obama’s executive branch? Barack Obama? Stanley Dunham?
Is there a fine? Will the facility be closed?
The patient is dead. Does HIPAA cover dead people?
Lot of stuff that has been discussed for months and even years here on the FR.
The coding of the #9 in pencil was the big new thing that came out today. The coding meant those boxes were supposed to be blank where it listed his race as “African”. Someone posted screen shots a few posts back.
I forget what the other box had typed in it (that was also supposed to be blank.).
“It also suggests that somebody has an active criminal investigation in progress”.
Perhaps. I certainly hope you are correct.
However, Sheriff Arpaio closed things today by pretty much saying he has gone as far with it as he can. To me that meant it was now up to the don’t rock the boat, ball-less wonders in Congress.
This entire episode is beginning to remind me of Gideon and his tiny army.
God had Gideon dismiss the 90% of his already small original army (mostly the cowards, the hesitant, and the hangers-on) before the battle against an entire powerful enemy force. He only required a few courageous men for the battle. In the end they won an overwhelming victory against an "unbeatable" army!
The layers of the PDF when opened in Illustrator is proof the birth certificate was altered. So is the white halo around all text and lines. So are the entries of information where a handwritten ‘9’ is entered. I’ll bet the birth certificate was originally signed in PEN as “Ann Dunham” (single mom).. “unham Obama” was overwritten with a bolder MARKER, LATER, and also Barack Sr. added LATER by the forger. Bye, bye, Alex Okrent.
“brains of a jellyfish”....AND I would submit to you that the one that typed in “African” was also born LONG after that BC was “issued” -—in keeping with the whole “politically correct” agenda LOL ;-)
Hi Mr Wright,
The vid, if you’re interested in keeping up to date, should be on the internet shortly (if not already). It should be easy to find on the utube and wnd.
To me, it was very informative regarding the “penciled-in” numbers. I had read some before on the matter, but the presentation today cleared it up for me. It’s definitely worth your time to watch it.
Regarding the question you had about FR’s info on the matter, I always check under the “Natural Born Citizen” link at the top of the FR page to get the latest. FR is the best, no doubt about it, in keeping a person informed.
Thanks. It is good to see Arpaio and his Posse expose Hawaii for having made it easy to commit birth certificate fraud, which confirms FReeper’s work going back for over 4 years now.
In the African countries who were along the dutch trade routes. The designations were used. AfriKan was used to donate those coming from native tribe. Another was used for Europeans and a third for those with mixed blood.
When we first did the research IIRC the Afrikan was spelled with a K. Kenya, South Africa were both of the trade routes and still use this term in their documentation.
Send the following paragraph to every news media, legislature, or anyone else that comes to mind. We MUST get the message out. ... It is a national security issue.
Under Hawaii's Revised Statute 338-17.8, a person only has to be an established resident of Hawaii, ... not necessarily a U.S. citizen, but any out-of-state, or foreign-born person, ... and then pay taxes there for One Year ... to be able to register and receive an official Hawaii birth certificate.
HIPAA exempts directory information from disclosure restrictions. sometimes lurkers simply likes to confuse this issue. There’s no law preventing Kapiolani Hospital from confirming whether or not Obama was born there.
That is not so. I never had to give blood or a birth certificate 50 some yrs ago when applied. My kids nor my grandkids have never given blood or shown a birth certificate in order to get married.
Maybe some state requires that but NON of the Western States do that I know of.
When I saw just the part of your comment down/up thread about having an active investigation going, I thought you were possibly discussing why there was no mention of the person of interest/forger today.
No, it's not. Go to any hospital and try to look at the log. No hospital will let you see it.
Hey, Romney, America #1 President said to GET LOST!! You ain't getting our support.
RR had a plentiful supply of wisdom and discernment and prophetic to boot!
"So give your servant a discerning heart to govern your people and to distinguish between right and wrong. For who is able to govern this great people of yours?" 1 Kings 3:9
We known who President Reagan served - so unlike the godless one who have now and the wanna be one.
I’ve given up being ladylike.
I definitely missed something along the way. What was said or written that implies the info Hawaii has is invalid?