Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Rasmussen Poll) Michigan GOP Primary: Santorum 35%, Romney 32%
Rasmussen ^ | 2/14/12 | staff

Posted on 02/14/2012 11:31:26 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009

Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, following his wins last week in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri, has now jumped ahead of Mitt Romney in Michigan's Republican Primary race.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Republican Primary Voters in Michigan shows Santorum with 35% of the vote to Romney’s 32%. Well behind are Texas Congressman Ron Paul with 13% and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich with 11%. Only one percent (1%) prefers some other candidate in the race, while eight percent (8%) are undecided.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; anticondumrick; antirickisproromney; bigspendersantorum; freeperheadsexplode; gingrich; gorick; mi2012; michigan; outtacontrol; poll; proillegals; prounions; rasmussen; romney; ronpaul; saintearmarx; santorum; thesaint; whattagenius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: b4its2late

All three are polling behind Obama. Badly.


81 posted on 02/14/2012 4:52:04 PM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Let's see. Santorum is: pro-gun, pro-military, pro-life, pro-family, anti-gummint edjamakashun, and most other conservative positions.

What could your problem be? Doesn't want to starve the poor? Doesn't pimp for eliminating taxes on the trust fund babies? Doesn't want to tax the folks of modest means? Something about Mexicans? Money has to be the root of your disdain for Rick Santorum, Right?

Rick is less tricky than his critics.

Conservatism is a far richer tapestry than to be defined by an adherence to the financial obsession of Ebenezer Scrooge before his uninvited guests arrived. "Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses? What are they doing with your tax money anyhow?"

Puhleeze!!!

82 posted on 02/14/2012 4:55:17 PM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Oh, maybe Rick is too good a husband and too good a father? We can’t have that, can we?


83 posted on 02/14/2012 4:58:31 PM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

If these polls are acurate..good for RS.
Otherwise, I think its time Willard dropped out.


84 posted on 02/14/2012 4:59:29 PM PST by Leep (Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

I’m sure “none of the above” would win the nomination in a landslide.


85 posted on 02/14/2012 5:12:25 PM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
The difference is that Santorum is also defending fiscal conservative values

How is he doing that exactly? He's not defending his record on fiscal conservative values because he can't. So it must be lip service or a johnny-come-lately conversion just like Romney.

86 posted on 02/14/2012 5:19:21 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Leep

When a person believes in Obama, there is little one can do for him.


87 posted on 02/14/2012 5:22:21 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

I wonder if it was that picture of Santorum and Bella that started his alleged “surge.” It’s a priceless photo.


88 posted on 02/14/2012 5:23:59 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: commish

Your post #26 is a great idea.


89 posted on 02/14/2012 6:38:55 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009; All
A ROMNEY defeat in MICHIGAN by RICK SANTORUM, will absolutely, bar none, be the SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD!! THE MSM AND WHITE HOUSE WILL BE APOPLECTIC.

Work folks, work! Pray! Talk up neighbors! Call for Rick into Michigan by phone with campaign lists from the warmth of your very own kitchen or den. Send $$$ (and to FR as well). Do it!!! This is crunch time.


90 posted on 02/14/2012 6:41:56 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Santorum is worth a good second look, my friends. Why is it the media and White House hate him so?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Not that it would be good...but the foreign situation just keeps getting worse,,and THAt is one of Santorum’s strong suits, Gingrich as well.

A huge factor would be WHO Santorum picks as VP.

That’s your “crisis intervention” for the night!(I try to relax by reminding myself I just don’t have much control over this....then I just freak out again.ha)


91 posted on 02/14/2012 7:06:56 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (NEWT in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mangia E Statti Zitto

agree.


92 posted on 02/14/2012 7:07:49 PM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (NEWT in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

I feel like we a backed up on the two yard line in an election we should already be in field goal range to clinch. Why is Obama at 50% approval ?

Where is our “John Elway” candidate ?


93 posted on 02/14/2012 7:18:47 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

“I don’t see how obama can lose.”

I can see plenty of ways.

But what we’re talking about is some therapy, so let’s start with truth. The truth is that obama has a good chance of winning. Any incumbent has an advantage going in and people will often pick the evil they know over the evil they don’t.

That said, the Presidential race will be about the economy, and Rick actually has a bit of an advantage in this respect in that (1) he isn’t obama, and (2) he really hasn’t said a whole lot about how he would approach the problem. That gives him some flexibility in putting together a politically palatable alternative. His blue collar roots help as well; he can credibly respond to the tired canard that the GOP is the party only for the wealthy.

His weaknesses are actually more on the primary side; he is a big government Republican and that is not a good place to be with conservatives. If conservatives choose to overlook that in the primaries, then it isn’t much of a problem in the general.

The ‘rats and their allies in the media will attack Rick for his social conservatism. We already know that. If Rick is the nominee, plan on a long slog over things like contraception. All in all, I think people care more about whether they will have a roof over their head and food on the table than a candidates views on that subject, so I wouldn’t expect it to be as much of a problem as it would in good economic times.

Summary: it’s a winnable race for Rick. Not easily winnable, and not winnable if Rick does the typical GOP thing and figures out a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. But all things being equal, he would have a fair chance going into the general.

(Full disclosure: I’m in the Paul camp. But Rick would be my next choice amongst what is available.)


94 posted on 02/14/2012 7:30:12 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Rand Paul for President 2016 (FR still rocks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I did not see the picture but you are probably right. I bet that the fact that he took three days off the campaign trail to play with his three-year old daughter in the hospital where she was being treated will be an irresistible quality to wives and mothers (and not a few dads) all over the USA---in the primaries and in the election.

That is particularly true since he had no political motive. Just a great husband and dad. Reagan's attraction was that he was the sort of guy you would gladly spend a few hours with. Santorum is a natural that way.

95 posted on 02/14/2012 8:31:22 PM PST by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
LITTLE RICKY ENDORSES ARLEN SPECTOR
96 posted on 02/14/2012 9:43:20 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeTeen

I could get behind Jeb. In fact I would have preferred Jeb over Dubya in 2000.

Romney? I would find it extremely difficult, even against Obama. I would probably end up voting third party.


97 posted on 02/14/2012 10:09:20 PM PST by NorthernCrunchyCon (Go cylons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

And is what is Mittens’ excuse for endorsing Specter’s policies?


98 posted on 02/14/2012 10:14:06 PM PST by NorthernCrunchyCon (Go cylons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; onyx

I’ve been one wishing we had a 1 day National Primary. I still have my NEWT 2012 sign in my yard, but if the time comes when we vote way late in Illinois and Newt is way behind and the next best choice is Rick, I’ll go with the person most likely to knock off Mitt!


99 posted on 02/14/2012 11:53:48 PM PST by Dengar01 (Go Bulls!!! Go Blackhawks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FerociousRabbit
Unfortunately voters are like lemmings. Witness the abandonment of Newt after FL. It snowballed with minor caucuses in which he never planned to compete strongly.

Santorum is an establishment guy. It's his job to push Newt out. I would like to see Romney pushed out but I don't see that happening.

If Romney and his establishment backers were really concerned about Santorum why would they be focused on attacking Newt in Michigan with another new blitzkrieg campaign? Why not hammer the apparently surging Santorum who cost him some caucus wins?

When the curtain is finally pulled back on Santorum, the low enthusiasm for the GOP this year--evidenced by low primary participation-- will drop even further.

Obama could and possibly will win in a walk.

100 posted on 02/15/2012 12:48:15 AM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum has baggage too. Demand an inspection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson