Will FR embrace socialism to make way for Rudy Giuliani as a Republican presidential candidate?

vanity | April 21, 2007 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.

One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.

All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.

FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?

Do you really expect me to do that?

[mkjessup]

sissyjane—
This account has been banned or suspended. Isn’t that a great way to start our week!? ;^)

No, we must 'mourn' the passing of sissy into the Big Zapper, it would be unseemly for us to 'celebrate'.

Are you handling the flowers, or is conservativeinnyc doing that? FTD has a dandelion bouquet special on this week, or so I hear.

[metmom]

Got your wish I see.

[metmom]

I think so. I can think of one who it might be.

It’s the light.....

[DCPatriot]

Thanks Hawk. I appreciate that very much

[metmom]

And yes, too small to punish them either, unless they caused provable harm to other citizens.

Oh? AIDS and HIV don't harm anyone? News to me, troll.

[sodpoodle]

>>>>>>>FReepers who feel the need to egg on, intimidate, name-call or otherwise be uncivil to other FReepers should remember what ultimately happened to Robespierre.

Re: Sissyjane
‘This account has been banned or suspended’
‘Okay’<<<<<<<<
________________________________________________________
Sad, but I have fond memories to treasure:

Posted by sissyjane to sodpoodle
On General/Chat 04/28/2007 3:19:28 PM EDT · 8,999 of 9,165

I call you arrogant, not the brightest bulb in the box, and basically inarticulate, but that’s just me!
________________________________________________________
au revoir, mon ami!
sod

[garv]

No, actually it was right here on FreeRepublic about 5 years ago. About 50% of Americans want abortion to remain legal but restricted to the first trimester, 21% want it outlawed, and 29% want abortion on demand with no restrictions.

Sure it was. Your numbers don't add up.

Have a nice day now.

[BlackbirdSST]

I know that you don't have the harpies to come to your rescue, but just tell us what you think.

LOL! THAT will prove to be quite a challenge for the former 10 percenters. A wild dog culled from the pack rarely survives of it's own accord. Blackbird.

[metmom]

LOL.

[BlackbirdSST]

LOL! Let the record show what a troll and a liar you are.

pffffft! The "record" show's no such thing. Blackbird.

[sodpoodle]

Just a semantic observation -

Home page for many accounts state: “This account has been banned or suspended”

In reality, most of those folks asked to have their accounts closed and persisted with random, childish personal attacks until it became fait accompli.

A better statement might be; Account has either been banned, suspended, or closed by default. (de fault of de fool)

[metmom]

It’s the light....

[MrEdd]

You can scream at me all you want .. I never said I was against securing the boarder

I posted that in selecting a candidate for POTUS, securing the borders was a viable method for rejecting unsuitable contenders. That removes more than half of those who have thrown their hat in so far, including Rudy and is one of the things I hold against Bush.

You said I was trying to bait you when I posed that.

[metmom]

There’s a couple more in the works , it seems.

[mkjessup]

Rudy isn’t even the GOP CANDIDATE yet.
It’s entirely one issue to consider voting for Rudy in the Catch-22 horror of IF a year-and-a-half from now he’s the GOP candidate.
But supporting Rudy NOW is acting as knowing accessory before the fact, so to speak, in furthering his Liberal agenda.

TSOA, that is about as concise as it gets. Great post.

It is no secret that Giuliani is a pro-abortionist who up until his conveeeeeenient flip-flop on partial-birth-abortion in the wake of the SCOTUS decision banning it, has always described himself as a 'pro-choice' (i.e. pro-infanticide) Republican, embraces the views of Margaret Sanger, receives political donations from NARAL, states that federal funding should be provided for women who can't afford to murder their children on a limited budget.

Any and every person who signs on and supports Giuliani is, if not endorsing, condoning his murderous views on the sanctity of human life.

There is no escaping that fact. You said it well TSOA, such people are 'accessories before the fact'.

[tioga]

I am astonished at the foolish behavior of so many FReepers. I keep looking in on this thread out of morbid curiosity. I wonder how much longer it will persist?

[metmom]

Whoo hoo! Caught up!

[Lurking in Kansas]

Good G*d! The never ending flaming, bashing, baiting, and insulting thread...

I doubt this won't end until '08 election night or half of FR gets banned -whichever comes first.

[dmw]

"Are you handling the flowers, or is conservativeinnyc doing that? FTD has a dandelion bouquet special on this week, or so I hear.”

Yeah, I’ve got that all taken care of. I ordered her some roses. I cut the roses off and sent her a dozen stems with thorns on it. Since she was a thorn here it seems perfectly fitting. Anyone wanna sign the sympathy card before I send it to her over in loserville at wideasleep.com?

[Lurking in Kansas]

Caught up!

LOL, see my posted before yours, LOL.