Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegal Immigrant Can Carry Guns: Federal Judge
Epoch Times ^ | 03/18/2024 | Zachary Steiber

Posted on 03/18/2024 10:18:27 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

An illegal immigrant was wrongly banned from possessing guns, according to a recent ruling.

A federal law, Section 922 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code, bars illegal immigrants from carrying guns or ammunition. Prosecutors charged Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, the illegal alien, in 2020 after he was found in Chicago carrying a semi-automatic pistol despite “knowing he was an alien illegally and unlawfully in the United States.”

U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman rejected two motions to dismiss, but the third motion, based on a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, triggered the dismissal of the case on March 8.

“The noncitizen possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5), violates the Second Amendment as applied to Carbajal-Flores,” Judge Coleman, appointed under President Barack Obama, wrote in her 8-page ruling.

“Thus, the court grants Carbajal-Flores’ motion to dismiss.”

Lawyers for Mr. Carbajal-Flores had argued in the most recent motion to dismiss that the government could not show that the law in question was “part of the historical tradition that delimits the outer bounds of the right to keep and bear arms.”

In 2022, the Supreme Court determined that the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment “presumptively protects” conduct that is covered by the amendment’s “plain text.”

To justify regulations, governments must show that each regulation “is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation,” the high court said at the time. “Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s ‘unqualified command,’” it said.

“Lifetime disarmament of an individual based on alienage or nationality alone does not have roots in the history and tradition of the United States,” Mr. Carbajal-Flores’s lawyers argued.

They pointed to several rulings interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision, including an appeals court ruling that declared stripping a man convicted of a nonviolent crime of his gun rights was unconstitutional.

The government opposed the motion, noting that neither of the cited decisions applied to illegal immigrants and that the defendant ignored other rulings that did, including a 2023 ruling that found that Second Amendment rights aren’t afforded to illegal immigrants. The government also offered examples of laws that prohibited certain categories of people from carrying guns, including “individuals who threatened the social order through their untrustworthy adherence to the rule of law.”

But Judge Coleman ruled for the defendant, finding that the laws against untrustworthy people contained exceptions for people who signed loyalty oaths and were deemed nonviolent.

“The government argues that Carbajal-Flores is a noncitizen who is unlawfully present in this country. The court notes, however, that Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. Even in the present case, Carbajal-Flores contends that he received and used the handgun solely for self-protection and protection of property during a time of documented civil unrest in the Spring of 2020,” she wrote.

“Additionally, Pretrial Service has confirmed that Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants. The court finds that Carbajal-Flores’ criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense.

An attorney representing Mr. Carbajal-Flores declined to comment. Federal prosecutors didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Reactions

The ruling drew a range of reactions from people in the legal community.

“Supreme Court has said the ‘people’ are members of the political community,” Larry Keane, a lawyer for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, wrote on X.

“Illegal aliens in US are not part of the political community and thus do not have 2A rights.”

Kostas Moros, a lawyer who represents the California Rifle and Pistol Association, said that he also saw the issue that way.

“Bruen asks for a historical tradition of modern regulation that justifies the modern law, and one plainly exists here,” he wrote, noting that groups that have been disarmed in the past, including loyalists, have the common thread of being “outside of the political community.”

Matthew Larosiere, another lawyer, disagreed, writing in an analysis that all immigrants, even ones in the country illegally, are part of “the people” in the Second Amendment. His argument rested in part on the 14th Amendment, which applies to “any person within” the country.

“To find that illegal immigrants are outside of ’the people‘ protected by the Second Amendment, you must believe that the Framers were talking about a different ’people' in the First, Fourth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments,” he wrote, adding later that he sided with the court in finding differences between historical laws such as the one that barred loyalists from owning guns and the law that applies to illegal immigrants.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; aliens; banglist; fromgod; guns; illegals; nra; rightsfromgod; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 03/18/2024 10:18:27 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The lower courts have finally found a group of people they think have the right to keep and bear arms. Just in time to arm the invaders who are conquering our country.


2 posted on 03/18/2024 10:20:36 PM PDT by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What part of “We the People of the United States” does he not understand?


3 posted on 03/18/2024 10:30:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rights are for citizens.


4 posted on 03/18/2024 10:33:18 PM PDT by Manic_Episode (A government of the government, by the government, for the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

Correct.

We have no 2nd amendment rights in any other country, btw. And in many places, even own property.

What we need to do is be like all the other countries and how harshly and restrictively treat foreigners.


5 posted on 03/18/2024 10:36:25 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We have another federal judge who needs to be removed from office.


6 posted on 03/18/2024 10:39:58 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin
We have another federal judge who needs to be removed from office.

Here come duh Judge!

220px-Sharon-Johnson-Coleman-cropped
7 posted on 03/18/2024 11:01:58 PM PDT by Nervous Tick ("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Meanwhile, until sanity resumes, soy illegale.


8 posted on 03/18/2024 11:10:40 PM PDT by Bethaneidh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Why am I not surprised to see yet ANOTHER libtard black female “judge”? This man broke our laws by entering the U.S. illegally, yet you deem him trustworthy enough to have a GUN? Excrement for brains!


9 posted on 03/18/2024 11:23:58 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Manic_Episode

Not really Rights are God given to all humans. Our constitution (it used to any how) protects ours from government intrusion. Read John Locke.


10 posted on 03/18/2024 11:40:44 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Just when you think you have seen the height of stupidity.

I'm not sleeping tonight already grieving for the loss of the United States. It is gone folks. The death rattle has already begun.

11 posted on 03/18/2024 11:47:57 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Procrastination is just a form of defiance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

I agree. We’re done. Stick a fork in us.


12 posted on 03/18/2024 11:59:59 PM PDT by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Been seeing illegals at gun shows...as of late. Even asked a couple their status and seems they were told they could buy. My Spanish is fair but that is what they claimed.


13 posted on 03/19/2024 12:04:10 AM PDT by dpetty121263
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2; Manic_Episode
Our constitution (it used to any how) protects ours from government intrusion. Read John Locke.

"Ours" is "us" ie U.S. citizens. You defeated your own argument.

14 posted on 03/19/2024 12:12:03 AM PDT by TigersEye (Our Republic is under seige by globalist Marxists. Hold fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman


15 posted on 03/19/2024 12:32:33 AM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m not going to be popular today, but I agree completely with this decision.

Rights, including the right to keep and bear arms, are an inalienable component of our humanity. They are self-evident freedoms that should be protected for all.

Every person has the right to defend their life, liberty, and property. Only the constructs of their government will impair their ability to do so; nonetheless, the right still exists.

What these folks do not have is a right to be in our country. That is a privilege and should be revoked immediately.


16 posted on 03/19/2024 12:46:07 AM PDT by TheWriterTX (🇺🇸✝️🙏🇮🇱)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
What part of “We the People of the United States” does he not understand?

Illegals don't have the right to breathe air in the United States!

Regards,

17 posted on 03/19/2024 12:57:53 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tomorrow all people in Chicago will be carrying and when stopping claim to be illegal with no ID! Sounds like the plan to protect yourself finally in that town….


18 posted on 03/19/2024 12:59:17 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterTX

We don’t club baby seals or try the mentally infirm so I’m not going to debate you.


19 posted on 03/19/2024 1:08:55 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Procrastination is just a form of defiance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait…..So you’re telling me that an illegal alien has Second Amendment rights, while the government is feverishly trying to take mine away? We really need to remove the phrase, “Now I've seen everything” from the English language.

And we actually have a law that was passed specifically to try to deny illegal aliens the right to purchase firearms? Isn’t that like passing a law that makes it illegal for a burglar to sit on my couch and watch my TV? Both seem self-evidently prohibited.

20 posted on 03/19/2024 1:14:53 AM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson