Posted on 11/12/2017 6:00:32 AM PST by vladimir998
MONTGOMERY, Alabama — Two new polls demonstrate that GOP nominee for the U.S. Senate Judge Roy Moore remains unaffected entirely by smears in the Washington Post against him, and his lead before the Post piece on Thursday afternoon remains intact. One of the polls, which were both provided by the pollster to Breitbart News exclusively on Saturday evening, was conducted on Thursday morning before the publication of the Post piece that afternoon. The second one was conducted on Sunday evening. Together, they show Judge Moore’s lead over Democrat Doug Jones has been virtually unaffected since the Post story came out.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The second one was conducted on Saturday evening not Sunday.
The Senate must have a lot to hide based on the level of opposition Roy Moore in receiving from every front. They can’t afford to have even one free agent in their ranks. I really think there is a conspiracy taking place in our government involving all the ruling class. Something very evil. I don’t know if it involves belonging to a secret society that meets in the basement of the capital wearing aprons and goat heads, but its something that all are a part of.
“...IMO, the attack on Rand Paul was attempted murder....”
I certainly agree. Too bad Rand was conceal carrying and popped the useless SOB in self defense...in his own yard. Talk about stirring up a shit storm, but that’s exactly what should have happened. That’s would happen here....you attack me on my own property, you’ll be leaving in a body bag at room temperature. That’s if you lucky.
**Having been a teenage girl myself and having two daughters I am no fan of predatory males. I find this type of behavior to be very serious and bad.**
I find the word “predatory” to be the extreme worst of defining males seeking females. Just as many things are judged “on a scale of 1 to 10”, so are males looking for females. If 10 is the worst, I would say I was a 1 in grade school (not at all interested), then a 2 in middle school (kinda interested in being friends). But starting high school I was probably a 3 (wanting a girl friend, but too shy to work for that goal).
By graduation I was probably a 5; quite comfortable being friends with girls, but was determined to find the right girl). By the time I was 21 yrs old, I had dated enough girls ( all legal age) I was starting to wonder if I would ever find a smart, pretty, and virtuous girl. By the time I was 23 (probably a 6 by then), I was thinking I might have to date girls that were as young as 17 to find a pretty one that was still a virgin, but then I met my future wife who was almost 21.
Back in high school (45 yrs ago) I remember an 8th grade girl that could have easily have passed for a senior. She was physically mature enough, and wore her mother’s makeup and clothes, to where she could fool someone that didn’t know her. She was reportedly very “active” by the end of her first year in HS.
If you want to see a preacher get tough on bad teenage behavior, I recommend Gino Jennings. He regularly hammers the black community (young, old, and in between) for bad behavior, and poor choice a clothing. He can be found on YouTube.
It was very predictable and very obvious - the storyline, the narrative, the timing of the announcement, the coordinated followup actions.
The RINO's/pretend republicans would rather have a democrat in the office than a conservative. They will team up with the dems to protect the swamp. Who are the real purists?!
I don't hear anguished cries of 'Oh nooees! you are going to let a democrat win!', from the usual parties.
I mean, how else can we evaluate these kind of claims? The length of time that has passed is common to many of these kind of claims, and is somewhat understandable. But, even that falls short because sexual harassment 'came out of the closet' in the 1990's.
Given that, according to my evaluation, Corfman's claims fall short, and I believe that the benefit of doubt has to go to Moore.
I like the logical approach you bring to this issue. Moore essentially admits to dating young girls. There is not much doubt about that and Moore essentially offers no real defense on that.
So one question is -- if Moore had no problem as a 32 year old going after an 18 year old then is it reasonable to think he would have no problem going after a 14 year old? I think that is a fair question.
But we have two things to consider. First -- although Moore is a sinner as we all are he has demonstrated his commitment to morals and love of God throughout his life. It doesn't mean he is incapable of sin but it is a consideration. Second -- we are left with your statement which I will paraphrase -- Moore gets the benefit of the doubt absent proof. There is zero proof that he diddled a 14 year old. All they have is a claim and the expectation of extrapolation that if he would go after an 18 year old then he could have gone after a 14 year old. I submit there is a HUGE difference between girls of 14 and 18. Therefore I don't buy their assertion that he is capable of doing it. Even if I DID think he was capable of doing it -- Moore still gets the benefit of the doubt absent proof.
Now if we get 20 girls coming forward saying Moore tried to have sex with them when they were 14 then we get to your point where the number of allegations matter. At some point it begins to look unreasonable that dozens of women were paid off.
However in this case we don't have any of that. We have one allegation with no proof. The rest of it is noise designed to condition the public into believing the story about the 14 year girl.
Time to donate again!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~
AMEN!!!!!!!!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Exactly what to do!! Bears repeating.
Seems that if he would have put the make on the 14 year old, chances are he’d have done that with the others. Yet there is no accusation of anything beyond a fee kisses. Correct?
The girl that was 14 claims he attempting to circle the bases. Her story that she used a phone in her bedroom to talk to Moore has already been discredited by her mother. We will see what else comes out.
Time to bring out the obscene pictures of Biden fondling girls/teenage girls and women of all ages!
Hands UnChristian Biden in action:!
Hey, we folks from Alabama might be country folks, but we ain’t stupid when it comes to these type things. We can smell a “RAT” when it stinks. I have heard no one, NOT one soul who said they were not going to vote for Judge Moore because of this lie. We will be there early and vote often if they will let me!!!! (LOL)
I knew it I knew it...Go Alabama...
And there will be at least 1 Georgia boy marching with em....me!
“One of the polls, which were both provided by the pollster to Breitbart News exclusively on Saturday evening, was conducted on Thursday morning before the publication of the Post piece that afternoon. The second one was conducted on Sunday evening.”
Breitbart’s sources for important news are legendarily accurate, and now they have stepped-up their game to include future events.
BRAVO Judge!
Yes! Stick that in your turtle hole!
If VA had run a conservative, they could have won. Instead they ran a GOPe squish. The lesson is not that VA is a blue state, but that conservative voters are sick and tired of the GOPe. Although I’m sure the GOPe thinks otherwise.
Now that the people of Alabama know that the MEDIA are behind these attacks, Moore could kill a puppy dog in the middle of town square and still win.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.