Posted on 03/05/2017 2:04:44 PM PST by HarleyLady27
Crime.
Because there never was any reasonable suspicion of Trump collusion with Russia. They took a Hillary campaign slogan and turned it into wiretapping her presidential opponent. Illegality with a legal false front.
YOU trust Gateway?
They are lying, spinning furiously, and sowing disinformation/misinformation everywhere, so as to distract and discourage.
In other works, DIM SOP.
I am wondering, really. So there is a suspected link uncovered between Trump and a Russian based server, which WOULD it seems warrant a FISA authorization and this = the rats are dead? How is that bad for the democrats? I guess I don’t understand the thinking.
Tipped off?! Ha! She was involved in the scheme.
I hear the media saying no evidence, the Dems are all saying different excuses.
Obviously they have not had their talking points sent out to them yet
Q. Did Bill and Hillary promise Loretta Lynch the Attorney General position in exchange for Lynch trying to get dirt on Trump through FISA wiretaps?
Quid pro quo?
Was THAT the purpose of the airplane meeting?
As much as Obama hated it, it was important for Hillary to win to protect the Obama legacy and secrets.
Her loss was devastating to the entire Left.
Obama is consolidating his forces--what better example of that is the fact that ValJar is moving in to the Black House over in Kalorama.
Obama and Valjar are going to the mattresses.
They are hunkering down.
Regardless, how does Hillary know about it on 10/31/2016?
Why else did they bring the “peeing on the bed” dossier to Trump and leak it? To cover what they had done as if that garbage justified wiretapping Trump for Hillary.
Computer scientists I suppose is Hillary feigned stupidity along the lines of wiping her server with a cloth.
They are in a panic. In the scramble, they have not had the time to get their propaganda points coordinated.
So...I like that...but...do we have access to the pleadings (or whatever it is that they are called in that “court”)? Do we know for a fact that no evidence was given (or crappy evidence?)?
How can the Dems not say, “well, the court independently and fairly ruled that there WAS evidence enough”?
(Perhaps an angle is that regardless, the crime on the D side is sharing with hilary’s campaign....that could obviously be a problem....)
Explain to me how could Hitlery know about the wiretap in order to tweet about it. My wife does not believe she would tell the whole world about an illegal wire tap, that she had to know it was ordered by somebody of power in order to even mention it. Thank you. Incidentally we both are big Trumpers.
Just like Christopher Hitchens said repeatedly— they are grifters, charlatans, con-artists and should be perp-walked in handcuffs to the federal pen for all the destruction they have caused.
What a bizarre tweet not to have got more attention at the time. Not that I think a Clinton woman is capable of writing her own tweets, but her communications staff did such a weird thing talking about “computer scientists” and and a “covert” server.
Lock her up.
?
5.56mm
Well that would be a damn serious crime.
And Mr. Comey would be in the process of trying to cover it up right now.
Wow!
It’s time for very long federal prison sentences.
Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump’s Wiretapping Claim
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3531773/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.