Posted on 03/05/2017 2:04:44 PM PST by HarleyLady27
Works for me...
“Excuse me, you think the AG should believe liberals must die in the streets because Trump is a tyrant? In what bizarro universe? And you think she didn’t go after Trump when she was AG, when she believes such craziness?”
If you bothered to listen to her statement or the transcription of it in the linked article, you would realize that what I said is EXACTLY what she said.
There are several articles from typically good, conservative media sources that, in this case, are putting out very misleading headlines.
This is a waste of time. We have far too many actionable matters that need our full attention. This speech / message is not one of them.
It is enough to merely point out that it is a lie that the current leftists are NOT bleeding and dying in these riots they are causing. It is conservatives and law enforcement officers.
We can point out the lies and hypocrisy. That’s all we have here. The ordinary.
The calls for prosecution must be directed where it is possible to do so.
For example, the illegal wire tapping and leaking of classified information.
Here is where the “blood on the streets” claim came from:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3531627/posts
The WND article headline has it, but it is misleading. Read or listen to her comments in the actual article.
She is making out the leftist protestors to be martyrs. That’s a hypocritical lie, but it is not actionable legally.
Why do i have a feeling this is the first and last we will hear of this story?
May I suggest Trump hating Republicans along with a Trump hating lying media?
This 'they' was old lord McCain that furnished the dirty dossier to the FBI!!! These puke r i n o s are up to their eyeballs in this mess.
Great post!
I think President Trump wants to catch the Obama administration holdovers destroying evidence. He’s giving the rats enough rope to hang themselves. Plus I think he wants to nail Schumer and Pelosi if he can tie them to the Russians.
There is one catch. It is very difficult or even impossible for classified information to be destroyed.
I think Trump only has to do a few things and it appears he started -
1. Demand a list of every single person in each agency who had access to the FISA requests that appear to have been made. He has this one covered.
2. Interview the affiant or person who wrote/swore to the affidavit(s) with copies of the affidavits in front of them. Who, what, where, when, and why did you write this and who was the source of that information. Who asked you to prepare this. Etc. Etc.
This is the place to start, but 3 is equally important moving forward.....
3. After evaluating the potential leakers demand that each of them submit to an interview followed by a polygraph regarding leaks of classified information and/or contact with media or democratic operatives. Security clearances are granted with a caveat that the person is subject to a polygraph exam.
This would go a very long way towards plugging the leaks moving forward and put people on notice that it will not be tolerated because prosecutions should follow.
At the rate the GOP has investigated stuff in the past 8 years he simply cannot wait for them to complete their investigation. The news in the past 72 hours alone would take a GOP led congressional committee 16 years to investigate. I am serious. They are ridiculously slow and largely weak and ineffective in the face of stupid democratic opposition and delaying tactics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.