Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election
Gateway Pundit ^ | March 5, 2017 | Christina Laila

Posted on 03/05/2017 2:04:44 PM PST by HarleyLady27

TGP reported earlier that the first FISA request came right after AG Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in June of 2016.

The second FISA request was submitted in October of 2016 just before the election. Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet on October 31st stating that ‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server’.

It appears she was tipped off to the wiretapping prior to the election.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 201610; 20161031; clapper; clinton; comey; constitution; crimes; elections; government; hillary; homonews; homosexualagenda; nsa; obama; obamagate; softcoup; tealeaves; trump; trumptower; wiretap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: chris37

I’m not sure that’s what Comey said. He is telling DOJ to put up or shut up, KNOWING they can’t put up evidence without revealing the FISAs that will expose them.


41 posted on 03/05/2017 2:19:22 PM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chris37
Per Ed Klein, Comey now works for Trump.

And has reported to Trump about the NSA surveillance of Trump Tower.

42 posted on 03/05/2017 2:19:25 PM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

Bingo! You’re talking about an ex attorney general who has the sheer balls to call for “blood in the streets”against Trump. There was only an “Injustice Department”.


43 posted on 03/05/2017 2:19:26 PM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

“computer scientists have discovered......” — how innocent sounding. computer scientists, indeed. busted, Hillary.


44 posted on 03/05/2017 2:19:36 PM PST by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss
Maybe he’s right. Maybe Hillary ordered it! Under what authority? As DemocRAT Presidential candidate? Former Secretary of State? Former Senator? Wife of a former President?
45 posted on 03/05/2017 2:19:42 PM PST by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

This is what’s amazing about what trump has done...

he makes one comment about the wiretaps, then sits back and watches the democrats squeal and conjure up different scenarios day after day of what is and what isn’t...

Trump obviously has hard evidence about this and is just sitting there allowing the democrats to continue to change their stories over and over about this...

You know he is grinning ear to ear watching the democrats act like middle school kids.....


46 posted on 03/05/2017 2:19:47 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27; Albion Wilde

Bingo! In the words of Hercule Poirot, a little matter that will exercise the grey cells quite adequately.


47 posted on 03/05/2017 2:19:48 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Does reading something on SLATE count as being “tipped off” these days?

Gateway Pundit, blazing the trail of stupidity yet again.


48 posted on 03/05/2017 2:20:07 PM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27
"Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet on October 31st stating that ‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server’./ip Queen Hitlary knows all about covert servers... Now I'm wondering if Hitlary's secret server was tapped into Trump's campaign???!!! Perhaps this explains why she deleted thousands of emails, and also explains WHY HER IT GUY BRIAN PAGLIANO IS AFRAID OF HIS OWN SHADOW!!!!

Pagliano was a NO SHOW before Congress and James Comey was utterly afraid to indict Hitlary BECAUSE THIS GOES ALL THE WAY UP TO OBAMA!!!

49 posted on 03/05/2017 2:20:24 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Feminism DESTROYED females)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

She conveniently cites a Slate piece.

Hillary Clinton Verified account
@HillaryClinton

It’s time for Trump to answer serious questions about his ties to Russia. http://slate.me/2dWggCd

4:32 PM - 31 Oct 2016


50 posted on 03/05/2017 2:20:50 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The conventional Democrat wisdom is that Trump is wrong---they'll find nothing on Obama. CASE CLOSED b/c there was a FISA courts filing approved under the Obama Administration, (which resulted in no findings of wrongdoing).

====================================================

REALITY CHECK---It is entirely possible Obama and his legal team may have perjured themselves before the FISA court by willfully withholding material information in order to manipulate the FISA court’s willingness to permit the government surveillance.

This would fall under the Crimes Act of 1958.

FALSIFYING GOVT DOCUMENTS---falsifying official documents is the criminal MO to hide larger crimes.

A person falsifying documents can be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.

Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties:
◾Having to pay a monetary fine
◾Incarceration in a prison facility

Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years.

Also, if official government documents or govt authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. Legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses.

Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting fact-based information
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document

The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.

51 posted on 03/05/2017 2:21:24 PM PST by Liz (DNC Chair Perez's new Democrat slogan: Join us, or we'll sue Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

There was only ONE really idiotic thing and she got FIRED for that one and her attitude and lack of doing her job and trying to be a BIG PLAYER, when she was a lowly “gofer”....only.


52 posted on 03/05/2017 2:21:49 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LS

Comey perhaps stated the warrants were “legal” and didn’t equal illegal wiretapping by Obama. Still is pure BS. Any legitimate administration knows that wiretapping the opposition is like setting off an atom bomb.


53 posted on 03/05/2017 2:21:56 PM PST by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Under what authority? As a Clinton! They don’t need no stinking badges...


54 posted on 03/05/2017 2:22:30 PM PST by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

Looks like Lynch better get her bloody street warrior on while she has the chance before her wardrobe change to prisoner orange.


55 posted on 03/05/2017 2:22:34 PM PST by TADSLOS (Reset Underway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

As I understand it, the President has the authority to initiate surveillance outside of the FISA process.

If that is the case, then perhaps the FBI wasn’t involved at all. That may be what Comey is getting at.


56 posted on 03/05/2017 2:23:02 PM PST by independentmind (In te Domine confido non confundar in aeternum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Williams
ex attorney general who has the sheer balls to call for “blood in the streets”against Trump.

Well under FISA snothing can be done without her signoff. Nothing.

So at this point her only defense is to cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war - except those dogs are rather fat and lazy and long in the tooth.

The only question is not her complicity, but how many go down with her. The circle is expanding - and expanding - and expanding - and...

57 posted on 03/05/2017 2:24:10 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; Velveeta; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Hillary Was Tipped Off On Trump Wiretap – Tweeted About it One Week Prior to Election,

"Just to show that there WAS a wire tap and others knew about it...and the date that they knew about it..."

58 posted on 03/05/2017 2:24:34 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
I hope you are right....but...how do we get around an intepretation which says simply, “the FISA court obviously believed the Trump campaign was seriously engaged with the Russians”? Could this not also be, theoretically, “proof” that the collaboration with the Russians is something that people were worried about? I get it that that’s the Dem talking point. But in order to truly bury the Dems, we gotta get around. Because on the face of it, it seems plausible. (I’m still trying to get up to speed here...so please forgive me if that comment is stupid :)).

Remember the initial request was rejected. So there was no there, there. The second request was for a computer only...so it was said.

The thing is, Obama could have approved the original surveillance while the FISA redo was underway.

59 posted on 03/05/2017 2:24:47 PM PST by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdzcm,.dadfjl,dz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The entire thing was all about getting Obama out of office ‘unscathed’...and Hillary from ‘facing charges’ by distraction and diversion..... They’re both out now...so for the Demorats that’s a success...protecting their political assets.


60 posted on 03/05/2017 2:24:51 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson