Posted on 12/11/2013 3:11:47 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
By the early 2020s, we will have the means to program our biology away from disease and aging.
Up until recently, health and medicine was basically a hit or miss affair. We would discover interventions such as drugs that had benefits, but also many side effects. Until recently, we did not have the means to actually design interventions on computers.
All of that has now changed, and will dramatically change clinical practice by the early 2020s.
We now have the information code of the genome and are making exponential gains in modeling and simulating the information processes they give rise to.
We also have new tools that allow us to actually reprogram our biology in the same way that we reprogram our computers.
RNA interference, for example, can turn genes off that promote disease and aging. New forms of gene therapy, especially in vitro models that do not trigger the immune system, have the ability to add new genes.
Stem cell therapies, including the recently developed method to create "induced pluripotent cells" (IPCs) by adding four genes to your own skin cells to create the equivalent of an embryonic stem cell but without use of an embryo, are being developed to rejuvenate organs and even grow then from scratch....
(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...
Oh, I get it now... Because of these new technologies becoming available to the masses, we need to ‘remove’ as many of them, (the masses), as we can before this technology does become available.
So they introduced Obamacare...
He claims that by 2030 solar energy will meet all our energy needs.
He is clueless.
Too bad he didn't get to do the Obamacare web site.
That seems to be their hope. All of their policies are pointed in that direction.
For myself, I have a greater hope, and it does not involve immanentizing the eschaton.
Good luck with that....when the next ice age kicks in around 2016 and all the solar panels are covered in frozen snow.
bump for later
Read his books. You will change your mind.
I have read sme them. Did not impress.
He is clueless.
He is probably right about the biology thing, but you are absolutely right about the solar energy. He has no concept of the physics of how much energy is required to run the world. None whatsoever. His statement is just so much wishful thinking, apparently to make him sound like a good guy.
It is always amusing to read speculations by someone whose entire knowledge of life science is limited to what he reads in heavily hyped mainstream media articles.
We are a *long* way from many of the things he is looking forward to—if they even become possible at some time.
And his pipe dream of immortality—I can see so many problems with that, both biological and societal, that I think it is as feasible as the utopia on earth that socialists are always trying to impose with their unworkable redistributionist schemes.
That being said, he is also an individual who has enormous faith in government omnicompetence.
He is on the record stating that unchecked nanobot replication could destroy the world, but it won't happen as long as nanotechnology is properly regulated.
Complete with serpent!
There are irreducible limits however, and environmentalists are already getting upset about large, ecologically disruptive panel arrays.
One question: WHEN DO I GET MY HAIR BACK?!?!
When I was young living forever sounded like a good idea. Now.. I am not so sure. I just want to live long enough to get to know my grandchildren before they grow up. Then I am done here.
I’m ready for a full body rebuild...gonna go full cyborg!
You win.
My opinion... Ray is beyond brilliant, but beyond optimistic, too.
I think his timetable is too accelerated, his faith in government too great, and his appreciation of the dark, nihilistic tendencies of mankind lacking.
I could well imagine a science-fiction dystopia where some of these things—immortality, effectively— come to pass for some minority, but they have to be held secret because the masses at large would kill the beneficiaries in the name of fairness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.