Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could the Different States Become Separate Countries in the Future?

Posted on 10/17/2013 8:45:51 AM PDT by ComtedeMaistre

Governor Rick Perry was once alleged to have stated that Texas could secede in the future. But he now states he opposes succession:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/onpolitics/2012/11/13/rick-perry-texas-secession-petition/1702359/

If the different states were to become different nations, the federal government would cease to exist. That means that the federal debt would be reduced to Zero. But the price that Americans would pay, would be the loss of super power status. Would Americans be better off or worse off, if the states were to become different countries?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cwii; cwiiping; federalgovernment; statesrights; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-246 next last
If the South was to secede again, would the federal government have the stomach to wage war like it did between 1861 to 1865?
1 posted on 10/17/2013 8:45:51 AM PDT by ComtedeMaistre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

If an individual state was to seceed, or one state here and one state there.....


2 posted on 10/17/2013 8:46:45 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

No.

Look for the USA to break-up down the road.


3 posted on 10/17/2013 8:48:15 AM PDT by Biggirl (“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

You mean idealistic patriotic citizen foot soldiers for largess in the North willing to go fight somebody with a gun? Let me stop laughing about that for a minute......I’ll get back to you


4 posted on 10/17/2013 8:48:25 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

Secession is legal, if the consent of the other states is gained and expressed through amendment or through Congress.

Absent that it is not secession but rather insurrection, and I have no doubt that the mismatch between US military power and any insurrection would be greater now than in 1865.


5 posted on 10/17/2013 8:48:41 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
Obama would, he'd be crushing his opposition.
6 posted on 10/17/2013 8:49:38 AM PDT by Farnsworth (One Big Assed Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

NE states will never agree to the land and oil rich states leaving and taking their assets with them.


7 posted on 10/17/2013 8:49:50 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
If the South was to secede again, would the federal government have the stomach to wage war like it did between 1861 to 1865?

The US government is so over-burdened with debt, size, and ideology, it is frozen in amber. Radical change would simply mean collapse.

8 posted on 10/17/2013 8:50:47 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
If the South was to secede again, would the federal government have the stomach to wage war like it did between 1861 to 1865?

I honestly don't think they could even if they wanted to, in this day and age where everybody can take and send video. They first couple times a video leaked of them shelling a school and killing women and children (either by accident or intentionally) there would be a huge backlash not only in the world community by even in the "northern" states they rely on to support the war to end the hostilities and negotiate.

Not only that, but a Civil War II would look nothing like 1861 to 1865 with nice orderly lines of uniformed soldiers marching around, it would look more like the Libyan/Syrian Civil war or even the Iraqi Insurgency, where the combatants can ambush a convoy or base and then blend in with the populace.

9 posted on 10/17/2013 8:53:40 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
-- If the South was to secede again, would the federal government have the stomach to wage war like it did between 1861 to 1865? --

No. If that happened, Washington would use nukes against the rogue states.

10 posted on 10/17/2013 8:57:42 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

I see a constitutional convention which disbands the union and reforms it with a less liberal states.


11 posted on 10/17/2013 8:58:04 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

That may be, or may not be, depending on the terms, but the legal requirement is for significant agreement, by enough to get 3/4 of the states for an amendment, or 2/3rds to get a treaty ratified by the Senate.

Simi Valley attempted so separate from the city of Los Angeles a few years ago. The ballot measure agreed that Simi Valley would pay $680 million to Los Angeles in the first few years after the separation.

It was voted down, but was close.

That may show the way to a deal, or it may show that the people considering secession just don’t want it bad enough.


12 posted on 10/17/2013 8:58:12 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

The loss of being a Superpower is no longer a great loss.

3 more years of Obama and we will no longer be a Superpower, if indeed we are still one now.

A military filled with Combat women and queers and finances cut to the bone, dependent on technology to exist.


13 posted on 10/17/2013 8:58:21 AM PDT by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

>>>I have no doubt that the mismatch between US military power and any insurrection would be greater now than in 1865

That may be true. But can the federal government get away with large-scale killing of people in the television, mobile phone, and youtube era?


14 posted on 10/17/2013 9:00:01 AM PDT by ComtedeMaistre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: apillar

I would hope that the fools supporting insurrection would not shell school, but they certainly are hotbeds of liberal indoctrination. Certainly the crazy people are more likely to do crazy things than people who are not crazy.


15 posted on 10/17/2013 9:00:05 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

Yes.


16 posted on 10/17/2013 9:00:31 AM PDT by Tupelo (Snatching Defeat from the jaws of Victory, an old Republican Tradition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
But the price that Americans would pay, would be the loss of super power status.

And any credit rating. If the U.S. dissolves and repudiates the existing debt then there is little chance that the new entities will be able to borrow anywhere, even within its own borders.

17 posted on 10/17/2013 9:01:35 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

I wish there were a movement to seccession. I would leave this rathole of a state and join it.


18 posted on 10/17/2013 9:01:51 AM PDT by ZULU (Impeach that Bastard Barrack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

If you can’t win an election, you can’t get a good result from a convention.

We are talking about plans to achieve better things for our children right, not just another temper tantrum?


19 posted on 10/17/2013 9:01:57 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
That means that the federal debt would be reduced to Zero.

Go back to school and attend all of those math classes you skipped.

20 posted on 10/17/2013 9:02:23 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I try to avoid loaning money to deadbeats, myself.


21 posted on 10/17/2013 9:02:36 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

This is a fantasy scenario. Interesting conversation, but secession is not going to happen.


22 posted on 10/17/2013 9:03:06 AM PDT by EagleInGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

To headline: yes


23 posted on 10/17/2013 9:04:05 AM PDT by svcw (Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains' obama's America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farnsworth

One thing about the left, it’s engrained in their ideology to absolutely crush/kill/exterminate anyone that resists or tries to escape the effects of leftism.


24 posted on 10/17/2013 9:05:15 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

If the union were to break up, the federal debt would not be reduced to zero as those who hold paper on US debt would still want their money and no credit would be extended to the new nations.

Their only option would be to print a worthless currency that would be subject to hyperinflation the moment it was printed.


25 posted on 10/17/2013 9:06:01 AM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

By original design, each state was supposed to be as like its own “country” with the federal bond of the republic only to have impact on a few issues such as common defence, trade, you know, stuff actually listed in the Constitution.


26 posted on 10/17/2013 9:06:04 AM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

“: would the federal government have the stomach to wage war like it did between 1861 to 1865?”

Yes, but from where would they draw the soldiers and materials? The north no longer has the men, money, and machines it had in 1861.


27 posted on 10/17/2013 9:06:24 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

“No. If that happened, Washington would use nukes against the rogue states. “

Washington does not have total control over nukes. It doesn’t work that way.


28 posted on 10/17/2013 9:07:18 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: apillar

The populations are too mixed these days anyway.

A few ignorant blowhards who declare people from above or below a certain latitude to be the enemy destroy any hope of success right from the start.


29 posted on 10/17/2013 9:07:25 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
NE states will never agree to the land and oil rich states leaving and taking their assets with them.

If a state were to arm itself with nuclear weapons and then tell the people of the cities of Boston and New York City that they're the first order of business in any war to prevent secession...then I expect the liberal statists to cave instantly.

30 posted on 10/17/2013 9:07:28 AM PDT by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

Here’s the thing, there will be no CWII

If the world and investors believed that a state (or states) was potentially going to secede from the Union and the United States could actually break up, the economy and the dollar would collapse so fast that panic would ensue and city Liberals will turn on each other and burn their own cities down

There would be so much chaos that Obama or Hillary or whomever wouldn’t have the ability to stop the secession.

Though secession might be pointless after that as there will be so much bloodshed, Liberals would have thinned much of their population out. Rural Conservatives meanwhile would have just passed the popcorn and waited it out and can come back in and pick up the pieces.


31 posted on 10/17/2013 9:07:41 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

Your post is correct....and profoundly depressing....


32 posted on 10/17/2013 9:08:08 AM PDT by nascarnation (Frequently wrong but rarely in doubt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

A breakup of The United States would be more complex than individual states going their own way. Urban vs rural vs suburbs, liberal regions vs conservative, etc. A large state like Texas with the resources to operate without Washington could pull it off, and could lead other like minded states with it. States where the divide between the democrat controlled cities and conservative hinterlands is greater would have a big problem going it alone.


33 posted on 10/17/2013 9:08:15 AM PDT by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

“I would leave this rathole of a state and join it.”

Is it the entire State or just the cities? I usually find ratholes are just that, holes in the States we know as cities.


34 posted on 10/17/2013 9:08:40 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MrB
correct, they are heartless in the pursuit of their agenda.

Reps folded to gain favor with the media and moderates, they should know from years of experience that they will get none.

35 posted on 10/17/2013 9:09:16 AM PDT by Farnsworth (One Big Assed Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

Note that in Syria the Al Queda terrorists set off a poison gas bomb or two, and blamed it on the Syrian government forces.

That ambiguity in responsibility will be in play in any insurrection. What is not ambiguous is the illegal nature of violent insurrection.


36 posted on 10/17/2013 9:10:07 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yawningotter

Even Texas would have to wall off Austin, Houston, and plan on mass murder behind its lines. When people propose insurrection, you should know that is their intent.


37 posted on 10/17/2013 9:11:39 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

I guess you also note that a successful insurrection would require mass murder.

Keep in mind that oppressive taxation is less evil than mass murder.


38 posted on 10/17/2013 9:14:17 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I beg to differ. The president does have total control, and people in the chain of command are constantly vetted for their readiness to follow his orders.


39 posted on 10/17/2013 9:16:39 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre
yes the South needs to secede from this socialist tyranny of washington DC and the tyrannical communist Obama.

I'm in Louisiana .I and others here are talking about how to do it

some of us are here:

http://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/b/50/Political-Talk.aspx

40 posted on 10/17/2013 9:17:59 AM PDT by Democrat_media (IRS rigged election for Obama and democrats by shutting down tea party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

You are right. However, the big nation states are collapsing and smaller and smaller groups of people are able to use force effectively. Check out the book, The Sovereign Individual by Davidson and Rees-Mogg. It was written a few years ago, but it predicts the break-up of countries and a chaotic future, at least for a while.

They say new or new versions of older political organization will arise. We may see the return of city-states. It’s an interesting book.


41 posted on 10/17/2013 9:18:59 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

What ever did happen to that nuke that disappeared from inventory last month anyway?


42 posted on 10/17/2013 9:19:12 AM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
What is not ambiguous is the illegal nature of violent insurrection.

It was illegal for Soviet citizens to violently overthrow the USSR in 1991. I take it you opposed that revolution?

43 posted on 10/17/2013 9:19:18 AM PDT by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Yes, the ticks will hold onto their hosts as long as they can.


44 posted on 10/17/2013 9:19:39 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

“The president does have total control, and people in the chain of command are constantly vetted for their readiness to follow his orders.”

Nope. The president entering codes into his little box does not launch nukes. You’ve watched to many movies and, as usual on FR, you’re talking out your ass.

You’re really not fit to be here with your hatred of the south.


45 posted on 10/17/2013 9:20:42 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: null and void

No idea. I don’t have it. Honest.


46 posted on 10/17/2013 9:21:11 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

The US has a different basis of law than USSR and a different history that doesn’t justify violent insurrection.


47 posted on 10/17/2013 9:23:26 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: null and void
What ever did happen to that nuke that disappeared from inventory last month anyway?

I know nothing about it.

http://i47.tinypic.com/2evrvxe.jpg

48 posted on 10/17/2013 9:23:26 AM PDT by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ComtedeMaistre

The problems is, as always, who goes first?
If anything like this is going to take place, I think that individual key states, which means the governors, are going to have to conference and war-game the scenarios.
You know for sure that the Feds are war-gaming these things everyday.
Perhaps it would help if citizens make their state reps know at which point Federal action, such as martial law, is absolutely unacceptable.


49 posted on 10/17/2013 9:24:21 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

The president entering codes sends orders. The people to whom the orders are sent are vetted to be the kind of person who would follow those orders. If they don’t follow orders in an exercise, they are removed from that position, and replaced with someone who will follow orders.


50 posted on 10/17/2013 9:25:09 AM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-246 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson