too bad....he was a good candidate and a good man...of course, not PURE and HOLY like some freepers prefer...
He would be rotting conservatism from the inside. Just like McCain, Lugar, Collins, Snowe, HAGEL. We would do just as well voting for someone with the last name Stalin, Mao or Castro. They are who they are and we need to see them for that. They side often with the progressives (evolution instead of revolution towards communism). But voting for them is voting for the ultimate dream of communism for the “elites” who will control us for our (their) own good.
He would have been great if he’d actually TRIED to win! He closed his office in Worcester, the second largest city in MA a couple of days BEFORE the election. He seemed to be fixated on Fauxcahontas’s heritage, and spent more time on that than on her political ideas.
Brown is a RINO and a LOSER. Let’s try a GENUINE conservative for once and take the seat!
He was voted into power due to the Tea Party. His sole job was to be “number 41” to rid Obamacare.
Scott Brown then threw the Tea Party under the bus. Who’s the ungrateful one here? Wanna try again with your fellatio worship of this clown?
If a ‘good’ man (Scott Brown) is proud of his support for the biggest killer of unborn babies on the planet, planned parenthood, what does it take to be a ‘bad’ man in your mind?
To hell with pure and holy! I’d like constant and consistent and on the right side.
Are you kidding? Here is a man who lied from the beginning. None of us even knew he was married until he was elected and that was to cover up his wife being liberal. After his election win; he did everything he could to go against what he said he stood for.
Well said.