Skip to comments.U.S. House Rejects Bill to Ban Gender-Based Abortions
Posted on 05/31/2012 5:33:17 PM PDT by Jean SEdited on 05/31/2012 6:00:23 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Bloomberg. Link only.
U.S. House Rejects Bill to Ban Gender-Based Abortions
Amen.. Come Quickly Lord Jesus.. Come quickly indeed.
Terrible terrible things are in store for this nation. And God’s Righteousness will be VERY just. I just pray he allows us believers to join Him before His wrath is poured out upon this wicked disgusting land.
Perhaps, that smelly piece of trash, jeremiah wright, was correct in his infamous quote
Your link 404’s.
Radical Feminism gets its predictable reward as other parts of the leftist coalition grasp what their hearts desire with no regard for the feminazis.
And, if it really is a lump of tissue, then there couldn't be any foul, now could there? Every child a wanted child (rang the mantra) so if a woman wants a son...who is to complain.
I am for banning abortion outright.
I have zero intentions of allowing it to be tailored in such a way that the feminists will continue to support it.
I predict they are about to make an about face in their thinking.
I am so young but lived through so many terrible times, but this is just not I thought it will happen.
In Moscow Homosexuals got their lesson, in here is like open door and they think they can do whatever..
I cry, I know man should not cry, but this is different tears of sadness and being tired.
Lord forgive them for they do not know what they doing, please And now betrayal of Pope Benedict XVI.
If only the republicans had control of the house......
Who agreed to this stupid “fast-track” process for this bill? Since the bill wouldn’t have survived Obama’s veto it needs to be slow-rolled until 2013 when Obama is replaced by Romney who at least says he’s against abortion.
What pieces of you know what. I have a daughter from China who is absolutely wonderful, and although abandoned at birth at least her birth mother was a better person then the U. S. House of Representatives (not all of them) that thought it ok if she would have just been aborted. Yes they needed a 2/3 rds vote, but it should have received a 100% vote banning gender selection. This should be a big campaign issue, talk about the ultimate war on women and girls!
I think they were hoping to get an Obama veto, thereby showing who really has started a war on women and baby girls before the election.
What in the name of hell is happening to our Republican-controlled U.S. House? This is exactly why we put the “R”s in charge and they are kicking us in the collective ass!!
It's like threatening to get into a fight when your friends are holding you back and you know no punches will actually be thrown.
The vote was 246-168, short of the two-thirds majority needed under a fast-track procedure used by the House.
Why fast track it then? You have the votes to pass but then screw up the vote procedure?
What did he do? Sorry, I haven't followed the news about the Pope lately.
Personal person butler who was close to Holy Father has stolen important personal documents, actually this getting much bigger for in Italia they are saying that even Cardinal might be involved.
I will keep you updated as more comes out; it is absolute betrayal like Judas.
It is so sad, Benedict is tired, and now this, it is personal much more then is being written.
Wow. I’m shocked.
We are living among the wolves. Email to you soon with information.
What does “salve” mean?
Are you in the US?
It means “hi” in Italian.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.