Skip to comments.
Obama: Commander-in-chief must support gay troops
Associated Press ^
| Oct. 1, 2011
| JULIE PACE
Posted on 10/01/2011 5:36:02 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama you disgusting slug. Why should we want to re-elect a divisive pig such as yourself.
2
posted on
10/01/2011 5:38:23 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Free ThinkerNY
The MSM-Obama Coalition from AP “American Propaganda”
3
posted on
10/01/2011 5:39:12 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: Free ThinkerNY
****He says they should not have allowed a crowd to boo a gay service member who asked a videotaped question in a debate last month.****
How were they supposed “TO CONTROL” the audience in a debate?
That is a scary statement!!!
4
posted on
10/01/2011 5:39:22 PM PDT
by
sodpoodle
(God is ignoring me - because He is watching you.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I support Army Rangers, not the “Rump Rangers”!
To: Free ThinkerNY
FUBO! Evil Marxist bastard!
6
posted on
10/01/2011 5:39:44 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Impeach the corrupt Marxist bastard!!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Does he really think that 1-2% of the population (many of whom won’t vote for him) are going to win an election for him? Talk about deluded. Or is it personal for him?
7
posted on
10/01/2011 5:40:47 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama: Commander-in-chief must support gay troops Only if he doesn't consider the gay lifestyle a perversion. And were does he get the "must support" idea?
8
posted on
10/01/2011 5:45:13 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
When we elect the next President and take over the Senate, I want them to reinstate “DADT”; however, I am pretty sure they won’t do it. This change of rules will have a very bad affect on our Armed Forces if it is not stopped before it becomes more set in stone. Pretty soon they will push for spousal benefits and then for transvestites to serve. Mark my words, the proponents of this change have a much larger agenda. This was a political move to change the character of the Armed Forces and to make it less traditional and conservative. Anyone with a brain should be able to understand that.
9
posted on
10/01/2011 5:45:56 PM PDT
by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: sodpoodle
If he can control the government over the Legislative and Judicial branches, why can't the next president?
I'm tired of these politicians knowing what is best for the majority. Unfortunately, the closer we come to people getting government handouts, the sooner we are the majority.
And I don't think that day is too far away.
10
posted on
10/01/2011 5:49:08 PM PDT
by
JimmyMc
To: sodpoodle
If he can control the government over the Legislative and Judicial branches, why can't the next president?
I'm tired of these politicians knowing what is best for the majority. Unfortunately, the closer we come to people getting government handouts, the sooner we are the majority.
And I don't think that day is too far away.
11
posted on
10/01/2011 5:49:08 PM PDT
by
JimmyMc
To: Free ThinkerNY
12
posted on
10/01/2011 5:49:35 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Free ThinkerNY
I know what an athletic supporter looks like, but what does a gay supporter look like?
13
posted on
10/01/2011 5:49:35 PM PDT
by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: 3Fingas
They already are agitating for so-called transgendered people to be allowed in the military. This is a low-down, sneaky strategy on Obama’s part. He intends to claim that any candidate that does not support the entire military is not qualified to be president. These people are beneath contempt.
14
posted on
10/01/2011 5:51:27 PM PDT
by
Pining_4_TX
( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
To: Rocky
15
posted on
10/01/2011 5:52:05 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
To: Free ThinkerNY
“...should not have allowed a crowd...”
Says a lot about someone to think thoughts like this.
To: JimmyMc
17
posted on
10/01/2011 5:53:24 PM PDT
by
JimmyMc
To: Free ThinkerNY
18
posted on
10/01/2011 5:58:11 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(nzt - works better if you're already smart)
To: 3Fingas
If we get a decent next President, then I am in hopes that they WILL reverse the gays in the military.
Of course, the GOP for the past several decades or more has often failed to reverse changes installed by the Democrats, for fear of offending someone. But we have reached the point where THAT MUST CHANGE. We simply cannot go on like this. We’ve reached the end of the road.
I’m in good hopes that someone like Sarah Palin will reverse it, and will be capable of convincing people that doing so is NOT an attack on our military, which of course will be the Democrat propaganda line.
19
posted on
10/01/2011 5:58:11 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius.)
20
posted on
10/01/2011 6:01:04 PM PDT
by
TaxPayer2000
(``Folks, you know it`s not enough to change the uniform.``- Sarah Palin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson