[3Fingas]

When we elect the next President and take over the Senate, I want them to reinstate “DADT”; however, I am pretty sure they won’t do it. This change of rules will have a very bad affect on our Armed Forces if it is not stopped before it becomes more set in stone. Pretty soon they will push for spousal benefits and then for transvestites to serve. Mark my words, the proponents of this change have a much larger agenda. This was a political move to change the character of the Armed Forces and to make it less traditional and conservative. Anyone with a brain should be able to understand that.

[Pining_4_TX]

They already are agitating for so-called transgendered people to be allowed in the military. This is a low-down, sneaky strategy on Obama’s part. He intends to claim that any candidate that does not support the entire military is not qualified to be president. These people are beneath contempt.

[Cicero]

If we get a decent next President, then I am in hopes that they WILL reverse the gays in the military.

Of course, the GOP for the past several decades or more has often failed to reverse changes installed by the Democrats, for fear of offending someone. But we have reached the point where THAT MUST CHANGE. We simply cannot go on like this. We’ve reached the end of the road.

I’m in good hopes that someone like Sarah Palin will reverse it, and will be capable of convincing people that doing so is NOT an attack on our military, which of course will be the Democrat propaganda line.

[svcw]

Your concerns have already begun.

[BobP]

... This was a political move to change the character of the Armed Forces and to make it less traditional and conservative...

--------------------------

Obama's plan for America's defeat... let gays and their lawyers destroy the US military.

Uncle Scratch

Don't drink the Dems' kool-aid!