Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rachel Maddow Clings to Baathist Party Line That 'Saddam Wasn't Pursuing' WMD
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2010/11/11/rachel-maddow-clings-baathist-party-line-saddam-wasnt-pursuing-wmd ^

Posted on 11/11/2010 9:30:01 PM PST by macquire

An excerpt from the Duelfer report was shown while Maddow stated the remarks above, the excerpt shown as a breakout quote. The excerpt read as follows - "The former Regime had no formal written strategy or plan for the revival of WMD after sanctions. Neither was there an identifiable group of WMD policy makers or planners separate from Saddam." Left out by Maddow was the rest of the statement - "Instead, his lieutenants understood WMD revival was his goal from their long association with Saddam and his infrequent, but firm, verbal comments and directions to them."

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: maddow; sourcetitlenoturl; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Maddow had John Stewart on tonight who quite openly blasted Maddow time & again. At one point he challenged her on her Saddam statement that Saddam was not pursuing WMD, comparing his 6 year old's son desire for an automobile as an analogy to Saddam. Stewart stated his 6 year old son desires a car, and even though it will take time and events, eventually he will get THAT CAR.
1 posted on 11/11/2010 9:30:04 PM PST by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: macquire

They found all kinds of Chemical WMD, they found mass graves, they found children locked up in prisons and so forth.
She is a communist/democrat foot soldier there to say the party line.


2 posted on 11/11/2010 9:33:37 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

Maddow fails to acknowledge that whatever Saddam was pursuing back then, he isn’t doing it now.


3 posted on 11/11/2010 9:38:34 PM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

I cling to the idea that Maddow is a total nit wit...ignorant at best, stupid at worse...


4 posted on 11/11/2010 9:40:20 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

Maddow: Saddam - good.... taxpaying Americans - bad


5 posted on 11/11/2010 9:43:54 PM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

We should care what this Carpet Queen Says?


6 posted on 11/11/2010 9:47:39 PM PST by GOYAKLA (Flush Congress in 2010 & 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

She’s got severe mental illness and should not be in tv pretending that her opinions matter. She should be in counseling because she believes she’s a man even though born a woman and no amount of drugs, operations, butch haircuts, or having a female as a partner is going to change that.
MSNBC loses all credibility with it’s trainwreck lineup of psychos and sociopath talking heads, especially Maddow.


7 posted on 11/11/2010 9:53:41 PM PST by Proud_USA_Republican ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: macquire

I would love to know the percentage of people in the United States believes that WMDs were in Iraq. They do polls for all this other nonsense, why not for this question. Could it be that the majority of people actually believed that WMDs were in Iraq even though nobody could find any? I bet that is why they never poll the Americans about this. The numbers would not work for the lefties.


8 posted on 11/11/2010 10:11:18 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

I guess putting live people into industrial shredders wouldn’t be considered evil?


9 posted on 11/11/2010 10:12:37 PM PST by Carley (WE SAW NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

Anyone with any sense knows that everything Saddam wanted to retain was taken into Syria before the invasion. Madcow is mad.


10 posted on 11/11/2010 10:52:28 PM PST by kingpins10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

These people are stupid.

First, Bill Clinton and the entire Senate, that’s all 100 senators, signed the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act. The state goal was to overthrow Saddam Insane and his entire regime and replace it with a democratic government.

That is a fact:
The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed following the Gulf War and
3. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.

See here for a quick Wiki that makes it a short read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Liberation_Act

Don’t forget to read the part where Clinton states categorically what Iraq admitted to.

Bottom line we knew as did the French, Germans, Italians, South African Nations, N. Korea(our intel on them) and many others what Saddam was attempting to acquire and what he already had

WHICH INCLUDED:
550 METRIC TONS of YELLOW CAKE. USED FOR MAKING NUCLEAR WEAPONS.

MORE THAN 500 SARIN AND MUSTARD GAS LACED BOMBS.

There is plenty more but lets look at some of the lefts vaunted leaders and what they had to say at various times:

Let’s start with Al Gore criticizing George Bush 41 for ignoring Iraq’s ties to terrorism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64

Or how about this hit from 1998 Al Gore: No Doubt Saddam’s Weapons Are Grave Threat:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFBl0fnMUVc&feature=related

Hey what about a guy that was once in Vietnam John Kerry saying he found WMD in Iraq
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH93UlGHBfk&feature=related

Hey even Nancy Pelosi claims Iraq had WMD and she seems pretty unequivocal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwDJRBOsj78&feature=related

Here is a greatest hits of Democrats who in no certain terms absolutely claimed Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction. They made these claims on more than one occasion and with specificity. The quotes are from Madeline Albright, Bill Clinton, Howard Dean, Sandy Berger, Nancy Pelosi, Jay Rockefeller, Joe Biden, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards:
3 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjcofMFHsA&feature=related

Here is a 6 minute video of other Democrats on Iraq’s WMD and how it would be irresponsible to leave Saddam unchecked;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts&feature=fvw

So who is the liar? Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Madeline Albright, et al?

Surely they knew Saddam had WMD. Bill Clinton did after all launch missiles on Iraq in an attempt to destroy some of them.


11 posted on 11/11/2010 10:57:07 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire
Why do Democrats always defend America's enemies?

(its a rhetorical question)

12 posted on 11/11/2010 11:11:32 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (Obama has demonstrated to the world the failure of Affirmative Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macquire

Liberals like Madcow always think they’re 100% right just because they’re liberals.

Even when they lie and deceive.


13 posted on 11/11/2010 11:13:22 PM PST by Bullish (Been to all 57 States.... Or is it 58?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley
I guess putting live people into industrial shredders wouldn’t be considered evil?

Try running a Muslim country sometime. The Christians are leaving Iraq in droves since we liberated it. Under Sadaam they prospered.

14 posted on 11/11/2010 11:15:02 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The meek shall not inherit the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I bet that is why they never poll the Americans about this. The numbers would not work for the lefties.

Yeah, just like they don't like to poll whether Americans support waterboarding terrorists. they don't like the results they get.

15 posted on 11/11/2010 11:17:38 PM PST by Bullish (Been to all 57 States.... Or is it 58?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I recall an article (excerpt form a book?) where it had quotes from Iraqi leaders in the war. They were not afraid of the Americans, even as we massed along the border.

They “knew” that as soon as we crossed over, the chemical warheads, etc. that the other divisions had would be put to good use. I think it was even Iraqi generals that believed this. (Of course Saddam always told them it was always the “other Divison” that had the WMD).

The generals were baffled and confused as to why the WMD were not used. Probably that confusion helped us win in such short order - they were counting on the WMD too much.


16 posted on 11/11/2010 11:19:16 PM PST by 21twelve ( You can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust ... another lost generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

You did a lot of work putting up that post with all those links, but MSNBC says that Bush lied and it was all his fault. So I guess none of that stuff actually happened cause Rachel and Keith say so.

Nice try though.


17 posted on 11/11/2010 11:27:27 PM PST by Bullish (Been to all 57 States.... Or is it 58?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Well dangit! Who are their sources?!!

I can’t get anything write. What a waste of time.


18 posted on 11/11/2010 11:34:40 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: macquire

Agents of Saddam were everywhere around the world, mostly Germany and France, trying to buy all the necessities for nukes/WMDs. They would admit to their European counterparts that they had an “unlimited” budget, and there were cutbacks in the 6 figures for both the agents (traveling always under diplomatic cover) and the Europeans they did business with.

This is absolute fact.

Whether or not Saddam had WMDs, he either thought he had them or was actively trying to acquire them.


19 posted on 11/11/2010 11:43:54 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

LOL

We won because we are the United States of America.

We did end runs and Blitzed our way to Saddam’s home.

By skipping past many Iraqi troops and going on to more important objectives, we cut them off from supplies and communication.

They weren’t going to win nothing.

We had air superiority, We own the night, We have superior comms, best training, best ability to range an enemy better weapons and snapier uniforms.


20 posted on 11/11/2010 11:45:33 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson