Skip to comments.
Did MicroRNAs Shape the Cambrian Explosion? (another evo "just-so" story exposed by ID scientist)
Uncommon Descent ^
| Cornelius Hunter, Ph.D.
Posted on 09/15/2009 8:09:13 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
The fossil record reveals a history of life characterized by the abrupt appearance of new species followed by no change and eventual extinction in most cases. Needless to say, abrupt appearances and no change is not exactly what evolution expected. Much of this was known in Darwins time and he figured that the fossil record was incomplete. Today such speculation doesnt work anymore. The evidence reveals even more clearly this pattern of abrupt appearances followed by stasis.
--Snip--
As in Darwin's day, the fossil record does not match evolutionary expectations and evolutionists have been trying to solve the riddle. How can the empirical scientific data be explained by evolution? One new idea is to have the recently discovered microRNAs do the heavy lifting...
(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: belongsinreligion; catholic; christian; creation; embarrasschristians; evolution; intelligentdesign; knuckledraggers; leonardisstoopid; notasciencetopic; ragingyechardon; science; slopingforeheads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-138 next last
To: xcamel
61
posted on
09/15/2009 11:15:58 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: Kozak
If they maintain “man was created with everything he has today”, why didn’t Adam and Eve have the internet?
62
posted on
09/15/2009 11:18:16 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: xcamel; All
Thanks to GGG, FR has the Daily FOSAdmit it. You enjoy coming here and debating the subject, as much as everyone else. It is (or should be) a learning experience for both sides, and a chance to express one's own views.
We are allowed the freedom to discuss our opinions based on the knowledge we each have, by the website owner.
THANK YOU MR. ROBINSON!
Since most who come here have complete belief in their own opinions, no one should expect to come out a WINNER, but only to have contributed to the dicussion and hope that others may glean something from the amazing amount of knowledge being put forth, and the further questions that knowledge raises.
63
posted on
09/15/2009 11:29:14 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
To: FormerRep
That the complexity of biological systems refute any proposed naturalistic explanation and that creation could be the only logical assumption.You are completely free to provide an alternative answer.
64
posted on
09/15/2009 11:32:44 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
To: humblegunner; AndrewC; Allegra
65
posted on
09/15/2009 11:37:05 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
To: AndrewC; Buck W.
66
posted on
09/15/2009 11:41:18 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
To: xcamel
If they maintain man was created with everything he has today, why didnt Adam and Eve have the internet?Al Gore hadn't been born yet.
67
posted on
09/15/2009 11:43:15 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
To: FormerRep; humblegunner
Ive seen it with my own eyes now (thanks for the email HG). You, sir, are a savage. Is there no end to your barbarity? Ah...he must have sent you the "Kiciking Malcolm" video.
Isn't that just awful? I'm tempted to call the Humane Society.
68
posted on
09/15/2009 11:47:34 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
To: Allegra; FormerRep; humblegunner
69
posted on
09/15/2009 12:39:40 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Where's this tagline thing everyone keeps talking about?)
To: UCANSEE2
70
posted on
09/15/2009 1:05:02 PM PDT
by
Allegra
(It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
To: Buck W.
“I set ablaze the strawmen constructed by others. I hope that provides clarification.”
You constructed a false scenario using an easily discernible lie and then have the temerity to see yourself a destroyer of strawmen? Delusional doesn’t begin to describe that. Defend your strawman? Retract your lie? No. Obfuscate? Yes. Repeatedly.
71
posted on
09/15/2009 2:27:11 PM PDT
by
Leonard210
(Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
To: Buck W.
“I set ablaze the strawmen constructed by others. I hope that provides clarification.”
You constructed a false scenario using an easily discernible lie and then have the temerity to see yourself a destroyer of strawmen? Delusional doesn’t begin to describe that. Defend your strawman? Retract your lie? No. Obfuscate? Yes. Repeatedly.
72
posted on
09/15/2009 2:27:13 PM PDT
by
Leonard210
(Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
To: Leonard210
Do you have some nervous tick that causes you to repeat nonsense incessantly?
73
posted on
09/15/2009 2:37:42 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: xcamel
I was addressing a cowardly gentleman who posted a lie and then tried to back it up with a bigger lie. What has that to do with you?
74
posted on
09/15/2009 2:42:38 PM PDT
by
Leonard210
(Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
To: Leonard210
Posting an angst-ridden screed twice doesn't make it less so.
75
posted on
09/15/2009 3:09:30 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: Leonard210; xcamel
FYI—the gentleman referred to is me.
Mr. 210—May I call you Leonard?—You are quite the nervous nellie! Your faith seems to be awfully weak.
76
posted on
09/15/2009 3:11:46 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: Buck W.
You posted a lie and followed up with a lie. Then you proclaimed yourself a destroyer of strawmen. Angst? How quaint. Why not simply defend the lies or retract them?
77
posted on
09/15/2009 3:14:05 PM PDT
by
Leonard210
(Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
To: Leonard210
I’m sorry—did I miss the election? Were you voted the FR truth arbiter in chief?
78
posted on
09/15/2009 3:16:17 PM PDT
by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: Buck W.
You posted a lie and followed up with a lie. Then you proclaimed yourself a destroyer of strawmen. Why not simply defend the lies or retract them?
79
posted on
09/15/2009 3:17:28 PM PDT
by
Leonard210
(Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
To: Leonard210
80
posted on
09/15/2009 3:18:18 PM PDT
by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson