Posted on 09/15/2009 8:09:13 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
The fossil record reveals a history of life characterized by the abrupt appearance of new species followed by no change and eventual extinction in most cases. Needless to say, abrupt appearances and no change is not exactly what evolution expected. Much of this was known in Darwins time and he figured that the fossil record was incomplete. Today such speculation doesnt work anymore. The evidence reveals even more clearly this pattern of abrupt appearances followed by stasis.
--Snip--
As in Darwin's day, the fossil record does not match evolutionary expectations and evolutionists have been trying to solve the riddle. How can the empirical scientific data be explained by evolution? One new idea is to have the recently discovered microRNAs do the heavy lifting...
(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...
I sense a clinical hostility in your posts. That’s a common finding within the pseudoscisnce community. I prescribed Xanax for a poster earlier who suffered from a similar malady; perhaps you guys should share.
And I say that as a Christian.
I kick kittens!
and you call yourself a hellboy fan.
Paranoia now. You should probably take your own advice and seek some pharmaceutical remedy.
And I say that as a Christian.
How far?
I see, the “I’m rubber, you’re glue...” defense. I didn’t expect that, and I’m completely unprepared to defend myself or my position. You’re too much for me.
He does. He kicks kittens.
Keep your kittens away from humblegunner.
I’ve seen it with my own eyes now (thanks for the email HG). You, sir, are a savage. Is there no end to your barbarity?
Maybe you shouldn't have started down that road. Irreducible complexity makes no mention of design.
I don't call them kittens.
Several observations:
o You don’t get sarcasm, do you?
o “Irreducible complexity makes no mention of design.” Of course it does. It is a supporting premise for design in the minds of lazy or stupid practitioners of scientists, i.e., IDers.
I kick one at least once a day.
You were sarcastic?
o Irreducible complexity makes no mention of design. Of course it does. It is a supporting premise for design in the minds of lazy or stupid practitioners of scientists, i.e., IDers.
Hallucinating now. And projecting. You are a shrink's dream.
LOL!
It’s much more fun setting yours on fire..
Yes, I was sarcastic. Trust me, we’re laughing at you and all of your posts.
Go see the Wizard again, his remedy didn't fix your brain problem.
Oh the horror!
cat-in-the-spin-cycle level....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.