Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul's supporters disappointed by results
Dallas Morning News ^ | September 2, 2007 | GROMER JEFFERS Jr.

Posted on 09/02/2007 3:41:26 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

As the vote tallies were announced at the Texas Republican straw poll Saturday, at least one supporter of Rep. Ron Paul of Lake Jackson couldn't contain his frustration.

"Fix!" he yelled from the back of the ballroom at the Fort Worth Convention Center. "There's no way."

The congressman put a great deal of effort into the event in his home state, even paying to bus in supporters. They seemed to be the largest force in town. So it was a disappointment to those supporters when he came in third.

Some were convinced that Dr. Paul won.

"The results are totally wrong," said Jason Scarbrough, a Paul supporter who lives near Houston. "There were 10 times as many Ron Paul supporters here than anyone else had. There's just no way."

Though there were clearly more Paul people at the straw poll event, the congressman with the libertarian leanings had a much smaller base of support among those who could vote.

Even Dr. Paul conceded that he didn't think he could win.

"They made it very restrictive," Dr. Paul said at a rally Friday night. "But we're trying to build the party. If they want us to build the party, we can."

Saturday's vote disappointed Kathy Massey, a 45-year-old Houston woman who works in the petroleum industry.

She described Dr. Paul as a man of integrity who wants the Bill of Rights restored – and a political titan.

"Las Vegas oddsmakers say he's the only one who can beat" Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, Ms. Massey said, without offering proof.

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truthers; asseenonstormfront; bigshrimp; conspiracytheories; crybabyronpaul; cuespookymusic; cutandrun; cutnrunronpaul; defeatists; electionpresident; elections; farrightwackos; gaysforronpaul; gop; harmrepublicanparty; holocaustdeniers; johnbirchsociety; keywordspam; logcabinrepublicans; moonbats; nutsforronpaul; patbuchananlite; paul; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulites; paulscaresrinos; paulsies; paultards; republicans; rino; ronpaul; ronpaulwithalqaeda; rupaul; senileronpaul; strawpoll; tinfoil; truthers; tx2008; weirdosforronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj
Hey, nothing wrong if you like early 19th century foreign policy... ‘cept this is the 21st century. I don’t consider nation-building to be a dirty phrase.

Whatever happened to fighting wars? Building schools and hospitals are not the jobs of the military.

41 posted on 09/02/2007 4:33:28 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Uh, because he’s the Dennis Kucinich of the GOP. Dennis supports 9/11 truthers, Paul supports 9/11 truthers. Dennis is for cut and run from Iraq, Paul is for cut and run from Iraq....do you want me to go on?


42 posted on 09/02/2007 4:33:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“What I’m saying is that straw polls Paul won, they were dismissed as being “nothing.” But polls Hunter or Romney or Fred won, it’s the gospel. If ever there was such rank hypocrisy here on FR, it’s on the Paul threads.”

What you are missing is that we are making fun of Paul supporters for making a big deal of some fixed straw polls. Now others win and the Paulists are being taunted with sarcasm.

The straw polls meant nothing when Paul won and they mean nothing now. Paul won’t win any states. He probably won’t get more than 5% in any primary.


43 posted on 09/02/2007 4:36:44 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Your ‘traditional sense’ comment is somewhat valid. I would ask if you thought the shrinking of the planet might make some of the traditional tenets somewhat untenable at this jucture though.

When you’ve got people from Middle-Eastern nations traveling to Europe and the U.S. peddling the terrorist dogma, aren’t we somewhat compelled to respond?

We were attacked by terrorists. Just because they weren’t a viable government’s leadership, isn’t it just as necessary for us to respond? Should we have waited until more attacks before responding?

It seems to me after the Cole, the embassy bombings, the barrak bombins, at some point we had to stand up and say, “Enough is enough!” Do you disagree with that?

In light of 09/11, you don’t think going after the terrorists where ever they were was a conservative action?

I ask this, because I do. And I happen to think that Saddam Hussein was a figurehead for terrorists, even if he wasn’t “THE” figurehead.

He paid out $25, to the families of suicide bombers in Israel. He violated the restrictions placed upon him by the international community. He made public statements calling for the destruction of the U.S.

I’m not sure how many cheeks some people think the U.S. should have turned before taking serious action.

What are your thoughts on this?


44 posted on 09/02/2007 4:38:34 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Admin Moderator
Paul supports 9/11 truthers

Ron Paul makes his political position clear on 9/11 truth

Mods, can you please delete the previous post as it violates the FR rule of lying about candidate's record?

45 posted on 09/02/2007 4:38:51 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Paul's supporters disappointed by results

George's, Ringo's Supporters Unavailable For Comment

46 posted on 09/02/2007 4:40:53 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The whole point is to act preemptively so that we don’t have to fight them.


47 posted on 09/02/2007 4:40:58 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Actually, yes I do want you to go on. By going on and using links to bring validity to your comments, you’ll be doing folks a service.

We can’t all be here every day. We can’t all keep up on the candidates moment by moment. If you have links and can validate the thoughts you express here, I support you going on as long as you like.


48 posted on 09/02/2007 4:41:06 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bray

I expected a better comment from the biggest Bush butt-kisser on this Forum.


49 posted on 09/02/2007 4:41:43 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

Play the record backwards... “Paul is dead.” ;-)


50 posted on 09/02/2007 4:42:28 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
"Correct. I'm just doing my part to advance the NeoCon/Zionist/PNAC world domination plan."

If we were really doing our job, we would allow Iran to build nukes. Israel is building good ABM defense systems, and the "paleo-cons" aren't (see Italy, Spain, UK religious identities and politics).

S. Korea, U.S. verifying reports on test of new N.K. missile in Iran: source
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1834307/posts
(4,000 kilometer range—will reach London and the Vatican—May 16th, 2007)


51 posted on 09/02/2007 4:44:06 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, will write Duncan Hunter in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Correction: “He paid out $25,000...”


52 posted on 09/02/2007 4:46:28 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ((Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking its heritage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

luaP deirub I luaP deirub I luap deirub I koo-koo-ka-choo!


53 posted on 09/02/2007 4:47:28 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
thanks to a biased article that only focused on a few nutjobs to portray the Paul campaign as a whole as driven by them.

What...you mean that all the other candidates don't have articles that put the little zinger "without offering proof" at the end of their supporter's comments?

54 posted on 09/02/2007 4:48:26 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I was with Paul on taxes and getting rid of the DOE, but I just can’t bring myself to vote for someone that doesn’t understand the Islamic threat that we face.


55 posted on 09/02/2007 4:48:54 PM PDT by Drumbum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
We should have went after Islamic terrorism after the original WTC in 1993, but that's simply playing the coulda woulda shoulda game.

Like I said, I have some reservations about Paul on foreign policy. I would like for him to call Islam what it truly is. Where I agree with him is that we shouldn't be meddling in the affairs of those Middle Eastern countries. Look, that region has been in turmoil since the dawn of time. You're talking centuries-old conflicts and ideas here. After the surge is complete and Iraq is stabilized, we should leave. We should secure our own borders and end immigration from Muslim countries here. Let them stew in their own juices.

If Paul was President, I wouldn't doubt for a second that he would declare war and fight like he meant it. He wouldn't be consulting with the UN or trying to appease "the international community." He'd declare war to Congress and fight it. So FReepers calling Paul a "cut-and-runner" or "being in bed with the terrorists" are really disingenious, considering that Paul has been a staunch supporter of the military up until Iraq.

56 posted on 09/02/2007 4:49:37 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I will agree that RP doesn’t go with the conspiracy nutjobs on 911 BUT he DOES blame the US for the attack. He says we need to talk to the Mooselimbs and understand their point of view.

Sorry, that alone disqualifies him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuX73Ixqtbg


57 posted on 09/02/2007 4:50:22 PM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan; BlackElk
Dr. Demento is...


58 posted on 09/02/2007 4:51:15 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Ron Paul meets Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth

http://www.911blogger.com/node/6503

Congressman Ron Paul on 9/11

http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/170107paul.mp3


59 posted on 09/02/2007 4:56:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

See my post #59


60 posted on 09/02/2007 4:57:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson