Skip to comments.
Freep a CNN poll.
cnn.com ^
| 2-27-06
| cnn
Posted on 02/27/2006 3:56:22 PM PST by dynachrome
Should a special counsel be appointed to investigate the legality of the Bush administration's eavesdropping program?
Yes
No
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: cnn; eavesdrop; freep; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Way late, but maybe we can get it closer.
To: Aussie Dasher; backinthefold; bayourant; birbear; BJClinton; brf1; Da Mav; ER Doc; ferri; ...
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me and gordongekko909 if you want to be added or removed from the Freep this Poll! Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (way too late, but maybe get it closer)
2
posted on
02/27/2006 3:58:29 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: dynachrome
3
posted on
02/27/2006 3:58:41 PM PST
by
xcamel
(One should hope Global Dumbing is reversible.)
To: dynachrome
FReeped, but we're a LOOOOONG way behind...
4
posted on
02/27/2006 3:59:14 PM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: xcamel
yup. The number voting kind of surprised me.
5
posted on
02/27/2006 4:01:52 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: dynachrome
Ugh...
I've heard so many "legal experts" weigh in on this, that I'm not sure what I believe about the legality of it all.
But, I hate the idea of appointing another special counsel to it.
This is one of those things that I think the Attny General should get together with the nine members of the Supreme Court and say, "This is what we're doing... is it legal?" And then let the Supreme Court have the final say, But I often live in a fantasy land.
|
Should a special counsel be appointed to investigate the legality of the Bush administration's eavesdropping program?
|
 |
|
Yes
|
|
66%
|
90219 votes
|
 |
|
No
|
|
34%
|
47071 votes
|
|
Total: 137290 votes
|
6
posted on
02/27/2006 4:03:57 PM PST
by
birbear
(You know what? This is crap. We're going to stop this.)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: dynachrome
It wouldn't let me vote "No". No wonder we're way behind.
8
posted on
02/27/2006 4:06:35 PM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: dynachrome
"The number voting kind of surprised me."
Yeah, methinks something is smelly there at cnn.
9
posted on
02/27/2006 4:06:53 PM PST
by
rj45mis
To: dynachrome
Duly FReeped - but we're losing.
10
posted on
02/27/2006 4:07:29 PM PST
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: DustyMoment
Yeah, Poll has probably been up a while.
11
posted on
02/27/2006 4:09:00 PM PST
by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: freeangel
Nor me and I tried on three different machines, all with different IP#'s.
12
posted on
02/27/2006 4:17:35 PM PST
by
AmeriBrit
(The 'hildabeast' must be stopped. RELEASE THE COMPLETE BARRETT REPORT.....NOW!)
To: freeangel
It wouldn't let me vote "No" either. I tried using IE and Firfox.
13
posted on
02/27/2006 4:39:41 PM PST
by
TheHound
(You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
To: dynachrome
An even better question.
Is the appointment of independent prosecutors unconstitutional?
To: everyone
It seemed to accept my NO vote.
FReep away.
15
posted on
02/27/2006 4:46:52 PM PST
by
California Patriot
("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws.")
To: dynachrome
Not to be a "wet blanket" . . . but why the heck would I visit the Communist News Network website for any reason?
16
posted on
02/27/2006 4:53:21 PM PST
by
DesertSapper
(I love God, family, country . . . and dead Islamofacist terrorists !!!)
To: dynachrome
FREEPED, but it will take a week to clean the slime off my computer.
17
posted on
02/27/2006 5:48:02 PM PST
by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: dynachrome
The whole notion of a prosecutor reviewing the constitutionality of these wiretaps is absurd.
To: freeangel
It wouldn't let me vote "No". No wonder we're way behind.Wouldn't let me vote no, just view the results (no problem). I'm not going to see if it will let me vote yes!
19
posted on
02/27/2006 6:30:18 PM PST
by
easonc52
To: freeangel
I don't see a point here. The act was legal. A special counsel would bring that point forward.....
Unless they were from the Rose Law Firm
20
posted on
02/27/2006 6:31:46 PM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Republicans protect Americans from terrorists, Democrats protect terrorists from Americans)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
