Way late, but maybe we can get it closer.
To: Aussie Dasher; backinthefold; bayourant; birbear; BJClinton; brf1; Da Mav; ER Doc; ferri; ...
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me and gordongekko909 if you want to be added or removed from the Freep this Poll! Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (way too late, but maybe get it closer)
2 posted on
02/27/2006 3:58:29 PM PST by
dynachrome
("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
To: dynachrome
3 posted on
02/27/2006 3:58:41 PM PST by
xcamel
(One should hope Global Dumbing is reversible.)
To: dynachrome
FReeped, but we're a LOOOOONG way behind...
4 posted on
02/27/2006 3:59:14 PM PST by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: dynachrome
Ugh...
I've heard so many "legal experts" weigh in on this, that I'm not sure what I believe about the legality of it all.
But, I hate the idea of appointing another special counsel to it.
This is one of those things that I think the Attny General should get together with the nine members of the Supreme Court and say, "This is what we're doing... is it legal?" And then let the Supreme Court have the final say, But I often live in a fantasy land.
|
Should a special counsel be appointed to investigate the legality of the Bush administration's eavesdropping program?
|
 |
|
Yes
|
|
66%
|
90219 votes
|
 |
|
No
|
|
34%
|
47071 votes
|
|
Total: 137290 votes
|
6 posted on
02/27/2006 4:03:57 PM PST by
birbear
(You know what? This is crap. We're going to stop this.)
To: dynachrome
It wouldn't let me vote "No". No wonder we're way behind.
8 posted on
02/27/2006 4:06:35 PM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: dynachrome
Duly FReeped - but we're losing.
10 posted on
02/27/2006 4:07:29 PM PST by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: dynachrome
An even better question.
Is the appointment of independent prosecutors unconstitutional?
To: dynachrome
Not to be a "wet blanket" . . . but why the heck would I visit the Communist News Network website for any reason?
16 posted on
02/27/2006 4:53:21 PM PST by
DesertSapper
(I love God, family, country . . . and dead Islamofacist terrorists !!!)
To: dynachrome
FREEPED, but it will take a week to clean the slime off my computer.
17 posted on
02/27/2006 5:48:02 PM PST by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: dynachrome
The whole notion of a prosecutor reviewing the constitutionality of these wiretaps is absurd.
To: dynachrome
Yikes, we're not doing well, but then again, CNN is very liberal.
Yes 66% 104869 votes
No 34% 53903 votes
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
