To: dynachrome
It wouldn't let me vote "No". No wonder we're way behind.
8 posted on
02/27/2006 4:06:35 PM PST by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: freeangel
Nor me and I tried on three different machines, all with different IP#'s.
12 posted on
02/27/2006 4:17:35 PM PST by
AmeriBrit
(The 'hildabeast' must be stopped. RELEASE THE COMPLETE BARRETT REPORT.....NOW!)
To: freeangel
It wouldn't let me vote "No" either. I tried using IE and Firfox.
13 posted on
02/27/2006 4:39:41 PM PST by
TheHound
(You would be paranoid too - if everyone was out to get you.)
To: freeangel
It wouldn't let me vote "No". No wonder we're way behind.Wouldn't let me vote no, just view the results (no problem). I'm not going to see if it will let me vote yes!
19 posted on
02/27/2006 6:30:18 PM PST by
easonc52
To: freeangel
I don't see a point here. The act was legal. A special counsel would bring that point forward.....
Unless they were from the Rose Law Firm
20 posted on
02/27/2006 6:31:46 PM PST by
Loud Mime
(Republicans protect Americans from terrorists, Democrats protect terrorists from Americans)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson