Posted on 02/28/2005 7:41:38 AM PST by DBeers
“Man and Woman”, “Wife”, “Husband”, “Widow”, “Widower” Banished From all Ontario Law
Terms, when referring to spouses, are banned from all government programs, services, documents
Toronto, February 25, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – With the obscenely rapid, three-day introduction and passage of its same-sex “marriage” Bill 171, the Ontario government has advanced a revolutionary change in the way all laws and government programs and institutions refer to marriage and married persons. Everything referring to spouses must now be gender neutral.
No longer can a married couple be referred to as “husband and wife” or “man and woman”. The terms “Widow” and “widower” are also struck from government statutes. Attorney General Michael Bryant stated, on introducing the bill, "Currently, the statutes offend the Charter of Rights and Freedoms".
Bryant conitnued, "The bill removes references to gender and gender-specific language from Ontario definitions of spousal terms and uses one term, 'spouse', to include opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples who are married or who live together in conjugal relationships outside of marriage."
Considering the massive size and pervasiveness of government, this is certain to gradually lead to a general devaluation of marriage throughout the province – all for the purpose of imposing “equality” for that tiny number of same-sex couples that chooses to “marry”, taking advantage of activist judge imposed re-definition of marriage.
“Spouse” is redefined in the new law to concur with the re-definition of “marriage” imposed by activist judges, but not yet passed in the federal parliament, that now includes same-sex couples.
A perusal of the bill shows substitutions for previously used spousal terms in numerous places throughout 73 Ontario Statutes as follows:
“Widows”, widowers” replaced by “surviving spouses”
“A person of the opposite sex” replaced by “a person”
“Wives, husbands” replaced by “spouses”
“Two persons of the opposite sex” replaced by “two persons”
“The wife or husband” replaced by “spouse”
“A husband or wife” replaced by “spouse”
“The husband and wife” replaced by “the spouses”
“A man and a woman” replaced by “two persons”
“Husband and wife” replaced by “spouses”
“Cohabited as man and wife” replaced by “cohabited as a married couple”
“Same-sex partner” replaced by “spouse”
Following is the list of Statutes affected by the marriage redefinition language requirements:
Absentees Act
Accumulations Act
Assessment Act
Business Corporations Act
Change of Name Act
Charitable Institutions Act
Child and Family Services Act
Children's Law Reform Act
City of Toronto Act, 1997 (No. 2)
Commercial Tenancies Act
Compensation for Victims of Crime Act
Consumer Reporting Act
Conveyancing and Law of Property Act
Co-operative Corporations Act
Coroners Act
Corporations Act
Courts of Justice Act
Credit Unions and Caisses Populaires Act, 1994
Declarations of Death Act, 2002
Domestic Violence Protection Act, 2000
Education Act
Election Act
Employment Standards Act, 2000
Estates Act
Evidence Act
Execution Act
Family Law Act
Family Responsibility and Support Arrears Enforcement Act, 1996
Fuel Tax Act
Gasoline Tax Act
Homes for the Aged and Rest Homes Act
Human Rights Code
Solemnization of marriage by religious officials
Income Tax Act
Independent Health Facilities Act
Insurance Act
Land Transfer Tax Act
Legislative Assembly Act
Loan and Trust Corporations Act
Marriage Act
Members' Integrity Act, 1994
Mental Hospitals Act
Mortgages Act
MPPs Pension Act, 1996
Municipal Act, 2001
Municipal Conflict of Interest Act
Municipal Health Services Act
Northern Services Boards Act
Nursing Homes Act
Ontario Disability Support Program Act, 1997
Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998
Ontario Home Ownership Savings Plan Act
Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System Act
Ontario Works Act, 1997
Partnerships Act
Pension Benefits Act
Perpetuities Act
Police Services Act
Prohibiting Profiting from Recounting Crimes Act, 2002
Public Libraries Act
Public Service Pension Act
Retail Sales Tax Act
SARS Assistance and Recovery Strategy Act, 2003
Securities Act
Substitute Decisions Act, 1992
Succession Law Reform Act
Tenant Protection Act, 1997
Tobacco Tax Act
Toronto Islands Residential Community Stewardship Act, 1993
Trillium Gift of Life Network Act
Trustee Act
Victims' Bill of Rights, 1995
Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997
See Ontario Passes Same-Sex Marriage Bill - All Party Collusion to Avoid Accountability Succeeds http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/feb/05022408.html
See the complete legislation http://www.ontla.on.ca/documents/Bills/38_Parliament/Session1/b171_e.htm
ping.
Canada.... LMAO!
The Revolution continues its march...
the slippery slope we're treading on. . . .
Cananda no longer keeps their stick on the ice... now aparently its up their "partners" bum..
Way to go Canucks... enjoy the bloodbath. Untreatable HIV and HEPATITIS and Government funded health care....... have fun.
They already have their own labels... Pillow Biters, fudge packers... perpetual adolecent...
Wow. That's astonishing. Nothing like taking steps to insure that words have less meaning.
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
The Revolution continues its march...
Or, the revulsion continues its march...
(/The British are coming?)
Homosexual Agenda much?
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
lovely....Canada...freak capital of the world...
Never should've stopped at 54'40"
Ah yes.....one can hear the Canadian sheep bleating a long way off.
Yep!
Soon, we will not be able to call them Canadians.
Amen to that!
There is something else very disturbing about this--the changes were made with a voice vote, ensuring anomymity for the members of Parliament.
In other words, voters have no idea how their representatives voted, and this was done on purpose.
This is double-plus-ungood.
Maybe all the queers will emigrate to Canada?
Ontario seems to have been taken over by the same bunch of fruitcakes who run Quebec!
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
And too bad, when we owned Mexico City, that Scott & Jackson(?) didn't just take the rest of it and consider it a good day's work.
We wouldn't have an "illegal alien" problem, would we?
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
Marriage should be protected, not perverted to accomodate an abnormality.
I guess they are also doing away with wife-bashers and battered women, etc. Soon, they will declare that all people become hermaphordites so they no longer have to worry about differences between the sexes at all. God knew what He was doing when He decided that there will be a Judgement Day - He will cleanse the Earth of this sickness.
|
|
They're taking the NHL strike wayyyyyyyyyyy too seriously. |
Quite.
I'm reminded of the increasing relevancy of the under-discussed Appendix A of "1984" - a detailed analysis of how to profoundly change a culture by removing or redefining words. Basically, if there isn't a word for it, it can't be thought.
Oh boy!
The deconstruction of language becomes the destruction of language. I recall shaking my head in wonderment the first time I saw an actress (it might have been Candace Bergen) refer to herself as an "actor." Apparently, in their sick little minds, the feminine suffix is somehow demeaning. Of course, that's total nonesense. It has nothing to do with the quality or importance of the actress. It is merely informational.
There is an ever-increasing number of androgynous first names like Sydney and Cassidy to go with the older Pat and Randy. If I read that the great new actor, Cassidy Smith, has been signed for one of the leads in "Romeo and Juliet," I wouldn't know which role he or she was getting. Of course, nowadays, a female Romeo and a male Juliet (or two males, or two females) would be just as likely anyway.
I don't think you're allowed to say "boy."
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
O well, we refused to go to Canada already because of their Gun Laws which make all of Canada into a "CRIMINAL PROTECTION ZONE", so I guess my WIFE and I (her HUSBAND) will just have to avoid visiting or doing business with the Canadian cesspool for yet another reason.
RamS
It will be interesting to see what happens WHEN they try and transplant the Canadian marriage from there into the USA. Imagine some kind of homo-activists attemting to get a spousal visa in contradiction of the 1996 DOMA.
This also makes "mother" and "father" illegal words since they are gender based.
The counter to this is Canada HATES MOTHERS.
hmmm... did not consider that -it is going to get real confusing!
Such a shame ... Canada used to be a great vacation place. Now their turning into the laughing stock of the Western Hemisphere.
It sounds as though it is time for Ontarioans to putting their Government into an Asylum. Even the President's multi-sense use of the word "freedom," in the Second Inaugural Speech, never went quite this far.
That would provide too much information, and would be biased in favor of the "A" designee. More likely, it would be Parental Units A and A.
Ping!! Ahhhh, here's a touchy-feely law sure to make you ... cringe...
What? (mock surprise) And use those old-fashioned, gender-centric notions which ultimately label and hurt? Not for these forward thinking (read: delusional) Canucks.
I love this part:
Nursing Homes Act
Will the new protection against discrimination mean that one's poor granny, recovering from an illness, will now have a gender neutral roommate who in a previous administration might have been 'labelled' male sex offender? What a Pandora's box they've opened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
