Movements, on the other hand???
FGS
Posted on 12/19/2004 7:30:57 AM PST by SmithL
Do we need any more evidence of how far Europe has fallen?
In 1521 at the Diet of Worms, Martin Luther defied the pope with these words: "Hier stehe Ich. Ich kann nicht Anders. Gott hilf Mier. Amen."
In English, that would be: "Here I stand. I cannot do otherwise. God help me. Amen."
Today the poor man would have to say: "Here I sit." He could not do otherwise.
The "sitzpinkler" movement, which started in Sweden a few years ago, has moved to Australia and Germany.
I won't go into detail. You can figure it out for yourself. "Sitzpinkler" is German for a man who sits in the restroom even when he doesn't have to. Otherwise, by demonstrating his "dominance" over women, he risks excommunication by the Left.
A newspaper called The Australian quoted a young woman named Jessica, a biologist, from the Swedish city of Uppsala: "All my friends demand that their husbands or boyfriends sit down," said Jessica."I think it shows respect for the women who clean.
"My brother, for example, would not dream of standing up. Among the young, leftish intelligentsia, there is also a view that to stand up is a nasty macho gesture."
Jessica has stumbled across the essence of why the world hates us: Simply because we are born American, we have advantages that they do not have.
America is devoted to individualism, capitalism and the idea that even a poor immigrant can one day become a millionaire.
Our Constitution, written by brilliant men, gives us the right to pursue happiness.
If happiness means buying a big gun, we can do it.
If happiness means buying a big SUV, we can do it.
If happiness means bringing freedom to Iraq, we can do that too.
We call this "natural."
Europe calls it "a nasty macho gesture."
But they say the same thing about standing up in the men's room.
So do you think maybe we should stop caring about what they think of us?
I got to thinking about "sitzpinkler syndrome" recently because of what I heard at a meeting at Tinley Park High School sponsored by a group called Common Ground (www.cg.org).
The meeting was led by a fellow named Jim Kenny, a thoughtful, honest liberal, not the type to pass on fake documents like Dan Rather.
Still, I got the feeling in this room of 150 people that I was a defiant stehpinkler.
Mr. Kenney laid out seven reasons to explain why the rest of the world — specifically, the Muslim world — professes a deep hatred for America:
Our power, wealth and "hegemony." Our "anti-democratic policies." "Globalization." Our "uncritical support for Israel." Our "arrogance, jingoism and Americanism." Islamism and anti-Americanism. George W. Bush.
Well, let me say a few things.
On Point No. 1, the reason we have so much power and wealth is that we are free and capitalist. We don't put undue burdens on our businesspeople.
Hey, Sweden, try it sometime. If you were an American state, your economy would rank just five rungs from the bottom — down there with Mississippi.
On Points 2 and 7, do I really have to remind the Left that the only democratic nation in the Middle East is Israel? On the other hand, every single Muslim nation in the world (there are more than 20) is run by a dictator.
And now we're supposed to take lessons from the Muslim nations about democracy?
Isn't that kind of … stupid?
On Point No. 3, I never have figured out what globalization is anyway. I think it means you can find a Dunkin' Donuts shop in the capital of Pakistan. I once read a story by someone complaining about this state of affairs.
Listen. I had no idea there was a Dunkin' Donuts in Pakistan in the first place. What are you hating me for? I didn't put it there. I care what Pakistanis eat exactly as much as Pakistanis care what Americans eat.
If the rest of the world doesn't want Dunkin' Donuts in their midst, they should just … not … go … there!
Another reason the anti-globalists love to hate us is that TV show "Baywatch." You know the whine — we unsophisticated Americans are shoving our beach bimbos on the rest of the world.
To which I say: You know, the reason "Baywatch" is on the air around the world is that a lot of non-Americans thought they could make money by offering the show to their countrymen.
And what do you know? They were right. "Baywatch" was once the most popular show in 130 different nations.
If you don't like that, well, why don't you do what I do? Let me spell it out: Don't … watch … it!
That's right. "Baywatch" was on the air in America from 1990-2001, and I never watched one single episode.
In sum, I saw little logic in the Tinley Park meeting and lots of emotion, navel-gazing and Oprah moments.
"My God, what's going to end the world first? Global warming or 'Baywatch'?" Oh, spare me.
Readers, let me clue you in. There is one reason the rest of the world hates us, and it is really simple: Envy.
They figure that if they can't do something, Americans shouldn't be allowed to do it either.
You can go along with that thinking if you want to. I'm not. That's why I voted for George Bush. Here America stands.
bmp
I think this is just a passing fad. I don't think in 50 years when Muslims are the Majority in Sweeden that Muslim men will put up with this garbage. Leftist women will find that their 'whipped boyfriends won't be of any used for defending them against Muslim attacks.
Where's that pic of Hitlery standing at the urinal?
Europe is our best friend. We are part of them and vica versa, no matter how anyone cares to feel about current politics.
I love going to Europe. I feel very comfortable there, especially with the deluge of American culture flooding their language, customs, products, etc. They like us, too, no matter what the pundits on either side say.
Politics is a game all countries play. When push comes to shove, I would NOT like to rely on countries in Asia, South America or Africa.
My $.02
Yesterday, I made some people furious by mentioning the Articles of Confederation as an example of a failed charter of government (which it is). They thought I had referenced the Civil War.
Makes you laugh, throw up your hands, and go hunting. Doesn't it?
Lost me there...
Can this be confirmed, and if so, how common is it? This is the first I have heard of this "movement".
APf
Stehpinkler. Heh heh.
Das liebe ich ja!
P*ss on them.
One of the "tricks" of rhetoric is to take the crazies of a movement and make them symbolize the entire group. It's entertaining, it's emotionally powerful, sometimes funny... and almost always somewhat dishonest.
I'm pretty sure that, aside from enclaves in places like some universities, no one in Europe has heard of this idea of men sitting to do their der whizzin. I'm equally sure that most who see themselves as feminists would think this idea to be utterly stupid, much like the proposals that women (with the aid of little devices) stand for their der whizzin.
And, while there is certainly an overlap between those who want men to sit during der whizzin and those who hate America, I'm pretty sure that there is not a causual link.
Movements, on the other hand???
FGS
Nein! mit standen und spritzen. Wetten der seaten is verboden! Setzen zee und spritzen in der vater is der correcten vay fer mein herr mit der langen hosen. Nein mit der bein prouden und standen mit der hosen fer der Fraulein to gazen on und be getten der envy.
Actually, my husband says that muslim men sit to pee - it's in the Koran. I have not yet confirmed this.
My men, all six of them, stand
And they do miss!!!!
Sigh
guess its just a liquid movement -- but honestly, the left is so bizarre that they are beyond parodying
The pre-amble specifically states the purpose for the whole union. Of course you are technically correct - it does not use the word "happiness" - just "... establish justice, provide for the common defense promote the general welfare, and ensure domestic tranquility ...". From memory I think it is close a bit slippery this morning.
The right to Pursue happiness is in the Declaration of Independence.
Cut the guy a break -
Diva's Husband
I think he missed something. When someone fails they look for reasons they failed. Usually, especially those in socialist states, they look at America as the reason. If your restaurant failed it is because McD's is down the street. If your pastry shop fails it is DD's fault. They never stop to think that it is the restrictive labor laws or the prohibitive cost of doing business that causes them to fail. To do so would be to admit some of the blame as one who voted for such policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.