Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE EXECUTIONER'S MOAT (Interesting Discoveries in the dirt)!
Archaeological Institute of America ^ | Volume 57 Number 2, March/April 2004 | DAVID KEYS

Posted on 02/19/2004 1:28:53 PM PST by vannrox

The remains of at least 60 criminals executed during the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries were found in a medieval moat at Oxford Castle.



Excavations in a medieval moat around Oxford Castle have so far yielded the remains of 60 to 70 criminals, mostly men in their twenties, executed during the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries. Archaeologists believe that dozens more await discovery. "This excavation has given us a much greater understanding of the way in which the bodies of executed criminals were treated in postmedieval England," said Andrew Norton, the field archaeologist running the dig.

The victims, all of whom are thought to have been hanged, seem to have been denied a Christian burial. They were interred in unconsecrated ground, and some 20 percent of them were buried face down or on their sides. Most were not buried in a traditional Christian east-west alignment, thus depriving them of the opportunity to rise from the dead facing Jerusalem on the Day of Judgment.

A number of dead had been used for medical instruction or experimentation after death. Three skulls were found with their tops skillfully sawed off, while the neck of another individual had been carefully cut through the seventh vertebra. The bodies may have been used for flesh or muscle dissections, but no archaeological traces have been identified so far. Two sawn-off crania--but not the skulls they were once attached to--were also unearthed.

Historians believe the dissected victims were used by anatomy schools at the University of Oxford's Christ Church College or at the old Ashmolean, most likely under royal license granted during the reigns of Elizabeth I, James I, or Charles I. At that time the Crown allowed four executed criminals a year to be used for academic purposes.

Archaeologists have discovered moving evidence of the pain suffered by the executed. In many cases, their hands were tightly clenched. Two individuals had held onto their own clothes with such tenacity that in one case a button and, in another, a fragment of clothing was found inside their clenched skeletal fists.

Death on the gallows generally occurred by slow strangulation; it would have taken up to a half an hour for a person to die. (Instant death through hanging, by the use of a drop through a trapdoor that broke the condemned person's neck, was only gradually introduced in the late eighteenth century.)

In the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries, death sentences were passed for everything from theft and burglary to treason and murder. Apart from holding political prisoners and debtors, prisons were usually used to detain people while they awaited trial; prison sentences were rarely given as punishment. The accused were acquitted about half of the time; of those convicted, half were flogged and the rest hanged.

Interestingly, a few of the executed were female. These women, mostly in their late forties or early fifties, may well have been hanged for witchcraft. Archaeologists have also found the remains of a child about 12 years old who appears to have been hanged and buried face down with the bottom half of his legs bent back as if they had been tied to his upper legs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ancient; archaeology; death; dig; dug; economic; excutioner; find; found; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; kill; medevial; old; past
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: mewzilla
May I ask a dumb question? Unless these poor sods were interred with rap sheets, how do they know the men were criminals?

I wondered the same thing. (you worded it well LOL) "Criminal" at that time was a rather objective concept wasn't it? I mean, speaking out against the crown's religion was "criminal."

41 posted on 02/19/2004 9:06:25 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Objective should have been "subjective." It's late.
42 posted on 02/19/2004 9:07:10 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
Why is that?!?

Travel and travail have the same root word.

17th century travel was very unpleasant, and dumped one in a hostile environment. Some made the judgment call that a relatively quick death was preferable to slowly freezing and starving to death in the colonies, after a couple months of sea sickness and scurvy.

43 posted on 02/19/2004 9:17:20 PM PST by null and void (Kerry is a DOUBLE war hero - once for each side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: scan59
I've heard this is one of the dangers of California's three-strikes-you're-out-for-life laws.

Except the criminals don't seem to be inclined to wipe out witnesses. I suspect it's because with modern forensics they know they face a very high probability of being caught if they raise the stakes to capital murder.

44 posted on 02/19/2004 9:20:24 PM PST by null and void (Kerry is a DOUBLE war hero - once for each side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: scan59
God forbid you get tangled up in the legal system in those days.

Or these.

45 posted on 02/19/2004 9:23:44 PM PST by archy (Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: night reader
I believe Australia, Tasmania, and possibly New Zealand were truly penal colonies

New Zealand was not a penal colony. Thankfully. :)

46 posted on 02/19/2004 9:50:46 PM PST by gungadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
"It's pretty controversial- the Mormons got a lot of bad PR for 'baptising' Holocaust victims a little while back."

And RIGHTLY so!!

47 posted on 02/20/2004 3:23:43 AM PST by Lion in Winter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lion in Winter
But... like the adage about a tree falling in the forest.

If someone is baptised posthumously by an LDS member with a temple recommend, does that really matter?

Can saying some strangers name in one of their sacred rites REALLY affect that persons eternal soul?

"I claim this land in the name of Queen Isabella", said by Columbus upon going ashore, did NOT turn the 'natives' into Spaniards, either.
48 posted on 02/20/2004 5:33:57 AM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Thank you, I love this ping list!


49 posted on 02/20/2004 9:12:17 AM PST by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlessedByLiberty
I think this giving Hillary too many ideas.
50 posted on 02/20/2004 9:17:56 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Okay, you made my day! :)
51 posted on 02/20/2004 9:55:42 AM PST by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson