Skip to comments.
China, Korea Dispute Ancient Kingdom
Newsday ^
| 1-31-2004
| Sang-Hun Choe
Posted on 02/01/2004 12:54:03 PM PST by blam
China, Korea Dispute Ancient Kingdom
By SANG-HUN CHOE
Associated Press Writer
January 31, 2004, 9:40 PM EST
SEOUL, South Korea -- The ancient kingdom of Koguryo, famed for its mighty castles and horseback warriors, has sprung back to life in a "war of history" between South Korea and China that carries alarming modern-day implications.
The dispute has raised diplomatic hackles and symbolizes what many say are rival geopolitical designs on Northeast Asia, a region rich in conflict and currently riled over North Korea's nuclear weapons programs.
The wrangling could also influence the way future borders are drawn between two of Asia's biggest economic powers should the region become unstable.
Koguryo ruled much of Korea and Manchuria, now China, until it vanished from maps 1,300 years ago. It has been dragged into the headlines by a Beijing-backed study that deems the kingdom to be an integral part of China.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ancient; archaeology; china; dispute; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; kingdom; korea; northeastasia
We're required to excerpt articles from Newsday. Please click on the site for the entire article.
1
posted on
02/01/2004 12:54:04 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
China always claims everything.
2
posted on
02/01/2004 12:56:19 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(Why are we even having this debate?)
To: farmfriend
Ping.
3
posted on
02/01/2004 12:56:20 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
More historical hegemony from the CCP.
Heaven help us if we ever discover that Chinese crossed the land bridge in ancient history, they'll be claiming California is theirs and willing to fight the Mexicans for it.
4
posted on
02/01/2004 1:00:11 PM PST
by
tet68
To: blam
This is troubling. Say China decided to bring force to their claims (I doubt it, but say they did).
Would the United States help China eliminate a dictator who consistantly causes trouble? If so, the Chinese could use it as precedent in a campaign against Taiwan.
Would the united States just Stand back and watch? It would weaken our image as global peacekeepers, and encourage conquest by other nations.
Would the United States Defend Korea? That would appear to condone ruthless dictatorships worldwide.
Definitely troubling.
5
posted on
02/01/2004 1:01:05 PM PST
by
sociotard
(I am the one true Sociotard)
To: tet68
6
posted on
02/01/2004 1:06:59 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Thanks for the link. Very interesting.
7
posted on
02/01/2004 1:27:01 PM PST
by
Lucy Lake
To: blam
8
posted on
02/01/2004 7:00:37 PM PST
by
an amused spectator
(articulating AAS' thoughts on FR since 1997)
To: an amused spectator
Very good links, thanks.
If these folks go far enough north and back enough in time, they're gonna bump into some Caucasian folks who were there in the north. (They really won't like that)
9
posted on
02/01/2004 7:20:14 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam; *Gods, Graves, Glyphs; A.J.Armitage; abner; adam_az; AdmSmith; Alas Babylon!; ...
Gods, Graves, Glyphs List for articles regarding early civilizations , life of all forms, - dinosaurs - etc.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this ping list.
10
posted on
02/02/2004 12:20:42 AM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: blam
Things which can only happen when a Korean and 10 Chinese drink together now spilled into the open. So how soon before they want Koreans to pay the tribute?
The fact is that Koguryo had middle-kingdom mentality of its own. They called themselves "children of Heaven." As such they refused to pay tribute to China once they had enough power.
China could not live with this. This resulted in the massive invasion of Sui emperor Yang-Di's 1.3million army. They ran into a quagmire, around a fortress in Liaoyang. Frustrated, the emperor dispatched 300K crack troops straight to Koguryo capital. But their planned link-up with navy's supply convoy failed.
Supply operation was disrupted by Koguryo troops. Out of supplies and in retreat, these 300K troops were ambushed by raging floods created by Koguryo troops bursting a dam in a river upstream. When the battle finally ended only 2,700 of 300,000 survived to return to their main army.
After a brief period during which Sui fell and Tang was establishing themselves, there was a peace. But after that, China demanded tributes and Koguryo princes as hostages to ensure good behavior. The previous war against China wrought serious devastation in Koguryo. Some in the royal court were inclined to make some kind of compromise, including the Koguryo king. But a group of warriors overthrew the king and wiped out those in favor of compromise. Now the stage was set for the second showdown.
Emperor Daizhong of Tang empire marshaled 260K troops crossed the dry upstream area of Liao river and took 3 key Koguryo fortresses and marched down to a key battleground near Anshi fortress next to the swampy area of Liao river. During this time, Tang's navy was supposed to bring supplies to the shore nearby at Liao-Dong Peninsula. Just as in the last campaign by Sui emperor, the supply operation was disrupted. Their navy was never able to get there due to Koguryo's shore defense. Facing stiff resistance in the battlefield and supplies not arriving, Tang's army had to retreat. It is interesting that the army retreated through the muddy swamp area rather than taking the earlier route of dry solid ground. It was hard for foot-soldiers and carriages and carts. The emperor himself had to help out by laying a wooden plank over muddy ground so that the carriages can travel. All indication is that their escape route was cut off. So they had to travel the swamp area to survive. Koguryo tried to cut off emperor's retreating entourage and capture him, but was not successful. He got really sick after this campaign and died in a couple of years.
People with a different language and root, with the big egos of their own, fought a massive do-or-die battle twice. And Chinese think that they were fighting Chinese?
To: farmfriend; blam
Not a ping, just a GGG update. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest -- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
12
posted on
03/15/2005 10:53:36 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, March 13, 2005.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson