Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Leaker!
Internet Sleuths
Posted on 05/05/2022 5:49:19 AM PDT by 2harddrive
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: 2harddrive
Try “googling” his name, and searching for photos and additional articles on him.
2
posted on
05/05/2022 5:50:15 AM PDT
by
2harddrive
(FREE 3D-printable Firearm blueprints available here: https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/)
To: 2harddrive
Jain’s name has been floated since day one.
To: 2harddrive
I think he is one of two main suspects.
4
posted on
05/05/2022 5:51:30 AM PDT
by
Fido969
(45 is Superman!)
5
posted on
05/05/2022 5:51:35 AM PDT
by
Doofer
To: 2harddrive
6
posted on
05/05/2022 5:51:41 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Arm up! They Have!)
To: 2harddrive
Whoever it is will be lionized by the Left.
7
posted on
05/05/2022 5:56:26 AM PDT
by
Starboard
To: 2harddrive
The guy likes to be in the news cycles - won’t be the first time.
8
posted on
05/05/2022 5:57:30 AM PDT
by
caww
( )
To: 2harddrive
Never burn a witch alive until they are a confirmed witch.
I think, we've seen over the years the harm of spreading bs about someone around.
9
posted on
05/05/2022 5:57:44 AM PDT
by
Theoria
To: 2harddrive
The other one is Deutsch(?), a female clerk for Breyer whose husband was an associate of the Politico journalist and he worked there himself. I think they deleted a picture of his wedding party showing the connection.
10
posted on
05/05/2022 5:57:53 AM PDT
by
struggle
To: 2harddrive
Whoever it is should be disbarred at the very min.
11
posted on
05/05/2022 5:57:58 AM PDT
by
tennmountainman
( Less Lindell CONS, More AZ Style Audits)
To: 2harddrive
To: CodeToad
Does it matter? Yes...if it was one of the 5....one might have to recuse...and that would make 4-4...and Roe would stand.
The draft goes way back to Feb. Was a more current opinion issued that we don't know about? Has the opinion been finalized...and they're keeping it from us...cuz they must.
If the court has ruled on paper...it should be issued immediately.
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: 2harddrive
He was given the document and ordered to leak it by the Justice
15
posted on
05/05/2022 6:00:53 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KW?E. NP. N.C. +12) Promoting Afro Heritage diversity will destroy the democrats)
To: Sacajaweau
Dude..
I hate to rain on your parade, but if the wise latina has to recuse, or breyer has to recuse, then it would be 5-3.
16
posted on
05/05/2022 6:02:38 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(And the people said NO! The End)
To: 2harddrive
17
posted on
05/05/2022 6:02:58 AM PDT
by
deport
To: 2harddrive; All
18
posted on
05/05/2022 6:04:33 AM PDT
by
PGalt
(Past Peak Civilization?)
To: 2harddrive
I'd wager everything I own that it's some Maoist scumbag working for one of the Rat Party appointees...or working for Roberts. He/she/it would list the pronouns "zee/zim" and has plans to live off of taxpayer money for the rest of its life.
I'll also wager that he/she/it will never be identified...because court members don't see this as an event that's worthy of note.
To: tennmountainman
If it is him I would want him sentenced to the following:
1. Banned from clerking/working in or holding any government associated legal / judicial office - for life.
2. Six years of REAL public service. Specifically, having to work as a public defender in a poor urban area - excluding handing immigration or asylum cases.
3. Banned from writing a book about anything he was involved in at the SC - including the leak.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson