Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Leaker!
Internet Sleuths

Posted on 05/05/2022 5:49:19 AM PDT by 2harddrive

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: 2harddrive

Wanna see my surprised face?


21 posted on 05/05/2022 6:12:25 AM PDT by SMARTY (“Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.” Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

He very much looks like one of the trainees from The Public Forum Institute.


22 posted on 05/05/2022 6:14:59 AM PDT by OftheOhio (never could dance but always could fight - Romeo company)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Who’s going to make them?

To quote Algore “...No higher controlling...”!

Or are you counting on them discovering they have a smidgen of integrity and acting upon it?


23 posted on 05/05/2022 6:15:04 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

These docs are files residing on PC’s and servers. Any of the IT staff could access. Gee, even high speed copier/printers have internal storage where an IT person could access the opinion after it was printed.


24 posted on 05/05/2022 6:17:30 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

The other possibility is Elizabeth Deutsch.

Watch out for misinformation. Trolls outing the wrong person will distract and discredit the process


25 posted on 05/05/2022 6:20:03 AM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

If the person is identified, I predict he will become employed by MSNBC or something similar.


26 posted on 05/05/2022 6:22:33 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

And l hate to rain on your parade, rats never recuse. Never.


27 posted on 05/05/2022 6:23:55 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

I have a simpler punishment in mind.


28 posted on 05/05/2022 6:27:48 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Kagan has recused herself from many cases due to having previously been the highest courtroom lawyer in the government, where she prepared cases that would end up before her court.


29 posted on 05/05/2022 6:28:35 AM PDT by jjotto ( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

The other possibility is Elizabeth Deutsch.

Great name…Betty Bag.


30 posted on 05/05/2022 6:36:03 AM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BBQToadRibs2

He can kiss his Law degree goodbye.


31 posted on 05/05/2022 6:37:18 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bert

If proven, that’s enough for bad behavior clause in the constitution for impeachment and removal.


32 posted on 05/05/2022 6:38:36 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

One would think that John Roberts’ internal investigation would have interviewed both these suspects...yesterday.

I’d say they know who the leaker is and now they are negotiating a soft landing rather than the significant punishment it would deserve to deter this in the future.


33 posted on 05/05/2022 6:39:42 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBQToadRibs2

If I were in his position and DIDN’T LEAK the document I would be in the first street corner avowing my innocence. Even if speaking out cost me my clerkship my good name is more important than any job!


34 posted on 05/05/2022 6:45:54 AM PDT by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

This


35 posted on 05/05/2022 6:49:50 AM PDT by xxtnchl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Sigh. My hero. There will be statutes made in his(?, can I say that word? I am not a biologist) likeness.


36 posted on 05/05/2022 6:53:23 AM PDT by Sir Bangaz Cracka (Poor 'lil Travon bees slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
He can kiss his Law degree goodbye.

So what. He will be invited AND paid to go on every news outlet. Paid for doing magazine articles and probably get book deals. He will be regarded as a martyr of the left. He knew this before he leaked it. If he is actually the leaker!

37 posted on 05/05/2022 6:54:41 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Check it out on TWITTER! https://twitter.com/search?q=amit%20jain%20leaker&src=typeahead_click


38 posted on 05/05/2022 7:05:29 AM PDT by 2harddrive (FREE 3D-printable Firearm blueprints available here: https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

If Roberts etc does not know within two weeks who the leaker is, he doesn’t want to know. There are not many people who would have access to the leaked document. Just a few dozen people.


39 posted on 05/05/2022 7:12:39 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14/12 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15/12 - 1030am - Obama team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

The vote will not/can not change.

With all the hoopla about the “unprecedented leak”, in NO WAY can the court allow a “leak” to influence/change a decision.

Talk about “precedent” setting!!!!!!!!

There would be “leaks” on every decision from now on if this leak was allowed to influence/change a decision.


40 posted on 05/05/2022 7:19:44 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson