Skip to comments.
Bill exempting CHL holders from gun-free zones passes Ohio House
Guns.com ^
| 7/07/17
| Chris Eger
Posted on 07/10/2017 2:25:24 PM PDT by RC one
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
07/10/2017 2:25:24 PM PDT
by
RC one
To: RC one
Why the need for this legislation? Why not just ban gun free zones?
The Constitution applies EVERYWHERE, as do our Constitutional Rights.
2
posted on
07/10/2017 2:26:44 PM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: RC one
heads are going to explode.
3
posted on
07/10/2017 2:27:09 PM PDT
by
RC one
(The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
To: usconservative
A business owner has a right to post those signs but he doesn’t have a right to ruin another man’s life over them. That’s how I see it. This law is reasonable and just.
4
posted on
07/10/2017 2:29:54 PM PDT
by
RC one
(The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
To: RC one
heads are going to explodeDo you expect Kasick to not veto it? Do you think the legislature would override the veto? That's the way things roll in Ohio.
5
posted on
07/10/2017 2:30:43 PM PDT
by
grania
(Deplorable and Proud of It!)
To: grania
I don’t know. Seems like we have made a lot of progress over the past 4 years or so. Look at the recent bill regarding suppressors and background checks for instance. I think it will pass to be honest.
6
posted on
07/10/2017 2:36:38 PM PDT
by
RC one
(The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
To: usconservative
7
posted on
07/10/2017 2:42:48 PM PDT
by
manc
( If they want so called marriage equality then they should support polygamy too.)
To: RC one
But watch sh!thead Kaysicker ultimately veto.
8
posted on
07/10/2017 3:01:09 PM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: RC one; ADemocratNoMore; Akron Al; arbee4bush; agrace; ATOMIC_PUNK; Badeye; big bad easter bunny; ..
Ohio PING!!!
Article and comments
Thanks, RC one
9
posted on
07/10/2017 3:02:33 PM PDT
by
Whenifhow
(when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
To: RC one
But, taking it further, any business/citizen who in any way causes a CHL customer to face unwarranted legal consequences shall be held liable for all legal costs and damages.
10
posted on
07/10/2017 3:04:15 PM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: RC one
Gun free zone was a Biden law, signed by 41.
Next question.
11
posted on
07/10/2017 3:37:34 PM PDT
by
hadaclueonce
(This time I am Deplorable)
To: RC one
That’s correct. The property owner can still ask them to leave,and the law requires that the CWP owner complies. The CWP only breaks the law if he doesn’t comply
But hasn’t this always been the case?
12
posted on
07/10/2017 4:27:02 PM PDT
by
sdthree
To: RC one
Concealed means concealed.
L
13
posted on
07/10/2017 4:29:03 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(America burned the witch.)
To: RC one
except for federali property, K-12 schools, and metal detectors we already ignore KILL ZONE signs in Colorado.
14
posted on
07/10/2017 4:37:12 PM PDT
by
bravo whiskey
(Never bring a liberal gun law to a gun fight.)
To: RC one
The Ohio Chamber of Commerce, Ohio Coalition of Battered Women and the Ohio Restaurant Association joined gun control groups in testifying against the bill in committee this week. You would think that a battered woman would be the first person to support this bill.
If I was a battered woman I would be carrying everywhere.
15
posted on
07/10/2017 4:44:39 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)
To: RC one
Which is why they kept the ability to ask someone to leave or be charged with criminal trespass. Seems like a positive compromise to me.
16
posted on
07/10/2017 5:04:04 PM PDT
by
reed13k
To: PROCON
17
posted on
07/10/2017 6:29:35 PM PDT
by
Tilted Irish Kilt
(The Fourth Estate has become Fifth column !)
To: usconservative
Why the need for this legislation? Why not just ban gun free zones? While I avoid most of them, private businesses have the right to make stupid decisions - just like they should have the right to decide whether or not to cater to homosexual "weddings" by decorating the cake a certain way.
I like that it allows one to ignore the sign unless asked to leave before anything can be done against the gun owner - as it is now (in a lot of States) they can call the law and lodge the complaint w/o talking to you first.
18
posted on
07/11/2017 2:51:40 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: usconservative
Why the need for this legislation? Why not just ban gun free zones? While I avoid most of them, private businesses have the right to make stupid decisions - just like they should have the right to decide whether or not to cater to homosexual "weddings" by decorating the cake a certain way.
I like that it allows one to ignore the sign unless asked to leave before anything can be done against the gun owner - as it is now (in a lot of States) they can call the law and lodge the complaint w/o talking to you first.
19
posted on
07/11/2017 2:51:46 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Pontiac
Yeah, that makes zero sense.
20
posted on
07/11/2017 6:08:07 AM PDT
by
RC one
(The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson