Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diamonds Beneath the Popigai Crater -- Northern Russia
Geology.com ^ | 11/25/2014 | Hobart King

Posted on 11/25/2014 8:36:15 AM PST by JimSEA

About 35 million years ago an asteroid about 5 to 8 kilometers in diameter, travelling at a speed of about 15 to 20 kilometers per second slammed into the area that is now known as the Tamyr Peninsula of northern Siberia, Russia. [1] The energy delivered by this hypervelocity impact was powerful enough to instantly melt thousands of cubic kilometers of rock and blast millions of metric tons of ejecta high into the air. Some of that ejecta landed on other continents.

The explosion produced a 100 kilometer-wide impact crater with a rim of deformed rock up to 20 kilometers wide. [2] We now know this feature as "Popigai Crater" or "Popigai Astroblem", the seventh largest impact crater that has been identified on Earth.

(Excerpt) Read more at geology.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: asteroids; astronomy; catastrophism; diamonds; russia; science; siberia; tamyrpeninsula
I thought this was very interesting. Diamonds of gem quality are largely limited to very old kimberlite volcanic pipes however, there is some possibility that diamonds formed in impact craters could have value industrially. The efficiency and lower cost of manufactured stones make the mining of this impact deposit unlikely.

The article give a feel for the tremendous violence of an impact. Even diamonds could not form from the carbon rich gneiss at the center of this crater. As a result, the diamond rich breccia is found in a circle with a 12 mile diameter from the point of impact.

1 posted on 11/25/2014 8:36:15 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

” In 2010 the worldwide production of synthetic industrial diamond was about 4.38 billion carats valued between $1.65 billion and $2.50 billion. This is an average price of about 50 cents per carat or less.”

You would have to literally mine a ton of diamonds a day to make it worth it.


2 posted on 11/25/2014 8:43:14 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

.


3 posted on 11/25/2014 8:43:25 AM PST by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

I believe they’ve known about this for many years. They’ve kept it quiet so as to not flood the market and drive the prices down. Supply & demand, don’tcha know!


4 posted on 11/25/2014 8:43:29 AM PST by Dubh_Ghlase (Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Whatever happened to cheap diamond film? It was supposed to be available by now.


5 posted on 11/25/2014 9:00:36 AM PST by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dubh_Ghlase

They’re not diamonds, they’re eggs.


6 posted on 11/25/2014 9:01:14 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA; 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ...
Thanks JimSEA.

7 posted on 11/25/2014 9:23:10 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Haughton Astrobleme: A Mid-Cenozoic Impact Crater Devon Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/237210205_Haughton_Astrobleme_A_Mid-Cenozoic_Impact_Crater_Devon_Island_Canadian_Arctic_Archipelago


8 posted on 11/25/2014 9:24:37 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks, that’s really quite recent as these impacts go. Makes me hope that we are working on identifying the risks. Something like that would set us back on our heels.


9 posted on 11/25/2014 10:14:32 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
"5 to 8 kilometers in diameter"

"15 to 20 kilometers per second"

"thousands of cubic kilometers"

"metric tons"

"100 kilometer-wide"

I was born in America, where the common people are educated to use standard English measurements. Despite the fact that the academic class has adopted the metric system in their work, the average man and woman in this country has not.

I understand that a base 10 system of measurement is superior to others, but I also think it's arrogant when writers and scientists insist on using it to communicate to the broad American public when most of us only have a vague grasp of it.

It's really not that hard to communicate to us in a language we understand.

10 posted on 11/25/2014 10:20:11 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

With synthetic diamonds bringing only 50 cents per carat, it ought to be her by now. Perhaps the difficulty working with it is the problem.


11 posted on 11/25/2014 10:48:38 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I can commiserate to a degree because it is hard to use our mind’s eye to visualize something. However, English and metric have become the language of science and it is important to be precise in standardized communications. As much as I’ve traveled in metric countries, I have to think “.6 miles” and “just over a yard” and “about one quart” when driving and getting gas!


12 posted on 11/25/2014 11:09:22 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
English and metric have become the language of science and it is important to be precise in standardized communications.

That's fine when engaging in internal communications, but when you produce articles and programming intended for ordinary Americans, it's either arrogant, or a gross oversight, to communicate using metric units of measure.

It puts an undue strain on the minds of the audience.

13 posted on 11/25/2014 11:23:40 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

#10 Base 10 is not superior!
To convert to rods and chains I just google.... : )
convert kilometers to rods
convert kilometers to chains

1 kilometer =
198.838782 rods

1 kilometer =
49.7096954 chains


14 posted on 11/25/2014 11:29:47 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Sorry but this article was primarily directed to geologists and interested parties. It was on Geology.com. I posted it because I thought that it was readily understandable to most anyone.


15 posted on 11/25/2014 11:31:48 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
I posted it because I thought that it was readily understandable to most anyone.

Relax, bud.

No one's saying the article isn't understandable. Most Americans are familiar enough with the metric system to get the general idea of the measurements and quantities being expressed.

It's just a lot kinder to use units of measure your audience is most familiar with.

16 posted on 11/25/2014 12:42:56 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Jumping on the band wagon:

“5 to 8 kilometers in diameter” = BIG

“15 to 20 kilometers per second” = Really Fast

“thousands of cubic kilometers” = A WHOLE LOT

“metric tons” = HEAVY

“100 kilometer-wide” = Bertha Butt Wide

:)


17 posted on 11/25/2014 12:50:10 PM PST by Magnum44 (I have had just about enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Those are the exact mental conversions I use to understand metric ;-)


18 posted on 11/25/2014 5:32:32 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA; SunkenCiv; All

Does this mean that there could be diamonds formed by the Chesapeake Meteor which hit around the same time also leaving a 60 mile crater?


19 posted on 11/25/2014 11:01:14 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

There certainly could if there were carbon rich sediments or metamorphic rocks there (quite possible). However they’d be small and unlikely of ant gem quality. It would be fun to find something like that.


20 posted on 11/26/2014 12:05:26 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson