Easterbrook on the magnitude of Greenland GISP2 ice core data

Watts Up With That? ^ | January 24, 2011 | Anthony Watts

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

MAGNITUDE AND RATE OF CLIMATE CHANGES

Guest post by Dr. Don J. Easterbrook,
Dept. of Geology, Western Washington University

The GISP2 Greenland ice core has proven to be a great source of climatic data from the geologic past. Ancient temperatures can be measured using oxygen isotopes in the ice and ages can be determined from annual dust accumulation layers in the ice. The oxygen isotope ratios of thousands of ice core samples were measured by Minze Stuiver and Peter Grootes at the University of Washington (1993, 1999) and these data have become a world standard.

The ratio of ¹⁸O to ¹⁶O depends on the temperature at the time snow crystals formed, which were later transformed into glacial ice. Ocean volume may also play a role in δ¹⁸O values, but δ¹⁸O serves as a good proxy for temperature. The oxygen isotopic composition of a sample is expressed as a departure of the ¹⁸O/¹⁶O ratio from an arbitrary standard

δ¹⁸O =

(¹⁸O/¹⁶O)_sample ‒ (¹⁸O/¹⁶O) x 10³

____________________________________
(¹⁸O/¹⁶O)_standard

where δ¹⁸O is the of ratio ¹⁸O/¹⁶O expressed in per mil (0/00) units.

The age of each sample is accurately known from annual dust layers in the ice core. The top of the core is 1987.

The δ¹⁸O data clearly show remarkable swings in climate over the past 100,000 years. In just the past 500 years, Greenland warming/cooling temperatures fluctuated back and forth about 40 times, with changes every 25-30 years (27 years on the average). None of these changes could have been caused by changes in atmospheric CO₂ because they predate the large CO₂ emissions that began about 1945. Nor can the warming of 1915 to 1945 be related to CO₂, because it pre-dates the soaring emissions after 1945. Thirty years of global cooling (1945 to 1977) occurred during the big post-1945 increase in CO₂.

But what about the magnitude and rates of climates change? How do past temperature oscillations compare with recent global warming (1977-1998) or with warming periods over the past millennia. The answer to the question of magnitude and rates of climate change can be found in the δ¹⁸O and borehole temperature data.

Temperature changes in the GISP2 core over the past 25,000 years are shown in Figure 1 (from Cuffy and Clow, 1997). The temperature curve in Figure 1 is a portion of their original curve. I’ve added color to make it easier to read. The horizontal axis is time and the vertical axis is temperature based on the ice core δ¹⁸O and borehole temperature data. Details are discussed in their paper. Places where the curve becomes nearly vertical signify times of very rapid temperature change. Keep in mind that these are temperatures in Greenland, not global temperatures. However, correlation of the ice core temperatures with world-wide glacial fluctuations and correlation of modern Greenland temperatures with global temperatures confirms that the ice core record does indeed follow global temperature trends and is an excellent proxy for global changes. For example, the portions of the curve from about 25,000 to 15,000 represent the last Ice Age (the Pleistocene) when huge ice sheets thousands of feet thick covered North America, northern Europe, and northern Russia and alpine glaciers readvanced far downvalley.

So let’s see just how the magnitude and rates of change of modern global warming/cooling compare to warming/cooling events over the past 25,000 years. We can compare the warming and cooling in the past century to approximate 100 year periods in the past 25,000 years. The scale of the curve doesn’t allow enough accuracy to pick out exactly 100 year episodes directly from the curve, but that can be done from the annual dust layers in ice core data. Thus, not all of the periods noted here are exactly 100 years. Some are slightly more, some are slightly less, but they are close enough to allow comparison of magnitude and rates with the past century.

Temperature changes recorded in the GISP2 ice core from the Greenland Ice Sheet (Figure 1) (Cuffy and Clow, 1997) show that the global warming experienced during the past century pales into insignificance when compared to the magnitude of profound climate reversals over the past 25,000 years. In addition, small temperature changes of up to a degree or so, similar to those observed in the 20^th century record, occur persistently throughout the ancient climate record.

Figure 1. Greenland temperatures over the past 25,000 years recorded in the GISP 2 ice core. Strong, abrupt warming is shown by nearly vertical rise of temperatures, strong cooling by nearly vertical drop of temperatures (Modified from Cuffy and Clow, 1997).

Figure 2 shows comparisons of the largest magnitudes of warming/cooling events per century over the past 25,000 years. At least three warming events were 20 to 24 times the magnitude of warming over the past century and four were 6 to 9 times the magnitude of warming over the past century. The magnitude of the only modern warming which might possibly have been caused by CO2. (1978-1998) is insignificant compared to the earlier periods of warming.

Figure 2. Magnitudes of the largest warming/cooling events over the past 25,000 years. Temperatures on the vertical axis are rise or fall of temperatures in about a century. Each column represents the rise or fall of temperature shown on Figure 1. Event number 1 is about 24,000years ago and event number 15 is about 11,000 years old. The sudden warming about 15,000 years ago caused massive melting of these ice sheets at an unprecedented rate. The abrupt cooling that occurred from 12,700 to 11,500 years ago is known as the Younger Dryas cold period, which was responsible for readvance of the ice sheets and alpine glaciers. The end of the Younger Dryas cold period warmed by 9°F ( 5°C) over 30-40 years and as much as 14°F (8°C) over 40 years.

Magnitude and rate of abrupt climate changes

Some of the more remarkable sudden climatic warming periods are shown listed below (refer also to Figure 1). Numbers correspond to the temperature curves on Figure 5.

1. About 24,000 years ago, while the world was still in the grip of the last Ice Age and huge continental glaciers covered large areas, a sudden warming of about 20°F occurred. Shortly thereafter, temperatures dropped abruptly about 11°F. Temperatures then remained cold for several thousand years but oscillated between about 5°F warmer and cooler.

2. About 15,000 years ago, a sudden, intense, climatic warming of about 21°F (~12° C;) caused dramatic melting of the large ice sheets that covered Canada and the northern U.S., all of Scandinavia, and much of northern Europe and Russia.

3. A few centuries later, temperatures again plummeted about 20° F (~11°C) and glaciers readvanced.

4. About 14,000 years ago, global temperatures once again rose rapidly, about 8° F (~4.5°C), and glaciers receded.

4. About 13,400 years ago, global temperatures plunged again, about 14° F (~8°C) and glaciers readvanced.

5. About 13,200 years ago, global temperatures increased rapidly, 9° F (~5°C), and glaciers receded.

6. 12,700 yrs ago global temperatures plunged sharply, 14° F (~8°C) and a 1300 year cold period, the Younger Dryas, began.

7. After 1300 years of cold climate, global temperatures rose sharply, about 21° F (~12° C), 11,500 years ago, marking the end of the Younger Dryas cold period and the end of the Pleistocene Ice Age.

Early Holocene climate changes

8,200 years ago, the post-Ice Age interglacial warm period was interrupted by a sudden global cooling that lasted for a few centuries (Fig. 3). During this time, alpine glaciers advanced and built moraines. The warming that followed the cool period was also abrupt. Neither the abrupt climatic cooling nor the warming that followed was preceded by atmospheric CO₂ changes.

Figure 3. The 8200 year B.P. sudden climate change, recorded in oxygen isotope ratios in the GISP2 ice core, lasted about 200 years.

Late Holocene climate changes

750 B.C. to 200 B.C. cool period

Prior to the founding of the Roman Empire, Egyptians records show a cool climatic period from about 750 to 450 B.C. and the Romans wrote that the Tiber River froze and snow remained on the ground for long periods (Singer and Avery, 2007).

The Roman warm period (200 B.C. to 600 A.D.)

After 100 B.C., Romans wrote of grapes and olives growing farther north in Italy than had been previously possible and of little snow or ice (Singer and Avery, 2007).

The Dark Ages cool period (440 A.D. to 900 A.D.)

The Dark Ages were characterized by marked cooling. A particularly puzzling event apparently occurred in 540 A.D. when tree rings suggest greatly retarded growth, the sun appeared dimmed for more than a year, temperatures dropped in Ireland, Great Britain, Siberia, North and South America, fruit didn’t ripen, and snow fell in the summer in southern Europe (Baillie in Singer and Avery, 2007). In 800 A.D., the Black Sea froze and in 829 A.D. the Nile River froze (Oliver, 1973).

The Medieval Warm Period (900 A.D. to 1300 A.D.)

The Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was a time of warm climate from about 900–1300 AD when global temperatures were apparently somewhat warmer than at present. Its effects were particularly evident in Europe where grain crops flourished, alpine tree lines rose, many new cities arose, and the population more than doubled. The Vikings took advantage of the climatic amelioration to colonize Greenland, and wine grapes were grown as far north as England where growing grapes is now not feasible and about 500 km north of present vineyards in France and Germany. Grapes are presently grown in Germany up to elevations of about 560 meters, but from about 1100 to 1300 A.D., vineyards extended up to 780 meters, implying temperatures warmer by about 1.0 to 1.4° C (Oliver, 1973, Tkachuck, 1983). Wheat and oats were grown around Trondheim, Norway, suggesting climates about one degree C warmer than present (Fagan, 2007).

The Vikings colonized southern Greenland in 985 AD during the Medieval Warm Period when milder climates allowed favorable open-ocean conditions for navigation and fishing. This was “close to the maximum Medieval warming recorded in the GISP2 ice core at 975 AD (Stuiver et al., 1995).

Elsewhere in the world, prolonged droughts affected the southwestern United States and Alaska warmed. Sediments in Lake Nakatsuna in central Japan record warmer temperatures. Sea surface temperatures in the Sargasso Sea were approximately 1°C warmer than today and the climate in equatorial east Africa was drier from 1000–1270 AD. An ice core from the eastern Antarctic Peninsula shows warmer temperatures during this period.

The Little Ice Age (1300 A.D. to the 20^th century)

At the end of the Medieval Warm Period, ~1230 AD, temperatures dropped ~4°C (~7° F) in ~20 years and the cold period that followed is known as the Little Ice Age. The colder climate that ensued for several centuries was devastating (see e.g., Grove, 1988, 2004; Singer and Avery, 2007; Fagan, 2000). Temperatures of the cold winters and cool, rainy summers were too low for growing of cereal crops, resulting in widespread famine and disease. When temperatures declined during the 30–year cool period from the late 1940’s to 1977, some climatologists and meteorologists predicted a return to a new Little Ice Age.

Glaciers expanded worldwide (see e.g., Grove, 1988, 2004; Singer and Avery, 2007). Glaciers in Greenland advanced and pack-ice extended southward in the North Atlantic in the 13th century. The population of Europe had become dependent on cereal grains as a food supply during the Medieval Warm Period and when the colder climate, early snows, violent storms, and recurrent flooding swept Europe, massive crop failures occurred. Three years of torrential rains that began in 1315 led to the Great Famine of 1315-1317. The Thames River in London froze over, the growing season was significantly shortened, crops failed repeatedly, and wine production dropped sharply (Fagan, 2000; Singer and Avery, 2007).

Winters during the Little Ice Age were bitterly cold in many parts of the world. Advance of glaciers in the Swiss Alps in the mid–17th century gradually encroached on farms and buried entire villages. The Thames River and canals and rivers of the Netherlands frequently froze over during the winter. New York Harbor froze in the winter of 1780 and people could walk from Manhattan to Staten Island. Sea ice surrounding Iceland extended for miles in every direction, closing many harbors. The population of Iceland decreased by half and the Viking colonies in Greenland died out in the 1400s because they could no longer grow enough food there. In parts of China, warm weather crops that had been grown for centuries were abandoned. In North America, early European settlers experienced exceptionally severe winters.

Significance of previous global climate changes

If CO₂ is indeed the cause of global warming, then global temperatures should mirror the rise in CO₂. For the past 1000 years, atmospheric CO₂ levels remained fairly constant at about 280 ppm (parts per million). Atmospheric CO₂ concentrations began to rise during the industrial revolution early in the 20th century but did not exceed about 300 ppm. The climatic warming that occurred between about 1915 and 1945 was not accompanied by significant rise in CO₂. In 1945, CO₂ emission began to rise sharply and by 1980 atmospheric CO₂. had risen to just under 340 ppm. During this time, however, global temperatures fell about 0.9°F (0.5° C) in the Northern Hemisphere and about 0.4°F (0.2° C) globally. Global temperatures suddenly reversed during the Great Climate Shift of 1977 when the Pacific Ocean switched from its cool mode to its warm mode with no change in the rate of CO₂ increase. The 1977–1998 warm cycle ended in 1999 and a new cool cycle began. If CO₂ is the cause of global warming, why did temperatures rise for 30 years (1915-1945) with no significant increase in CO₂? Why did temperatures fall for 30 years (1945-1977) while CO₂ was sharply accelerating? Logic dictates that this anomalous cooling cycle during accelerating CO₂ levels must mean either (1) rising CO₂ is not the cause of global warming or (2) some process other than rising CO₂ is capable of strongly overriding its effect on global atmospheric warming.

Temperature patterns since the Little Ice Age (~1300 to 1860 A.D.) show a very similar pattern; 25–30 year–long periods of alternating warm and cool temperatures during overall warming from the Little Ice Age low. These temperature fluctuations took place well before any significant effect of anthropogenic atmospheric CO₂.

Conclusions

Temperature changes recorded in the GISP2 ice core from the Greenland Ice Sheet show that the magnitude of global warming experienced during the past century is insignificant compared to the magnitude of the profound natural climate reversals over the past 25,000 years, which preceded any significant rise of atmospheric CO₂. If so many much more intense periods of warming occurred naturally in the past without increase in CO₂, why should the mere coincidence of a small period of low magnitude warming this century be blamed on CO₂?

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

fyi

[JSteff]

None of these changes could have been caused by changes in atmospheric CO2 because they predate the large CO2 emissions that began about 1945.

So what do the Global Warming huts have to say now?

[TigersEye]

Unless all of those ice cores and the way they are interpreted is completely and utterly wrong this is proof positive that there is no AWG and CO2 has no effect on the climate.

But then ice cores are far from the only proof of these historical temperature swings.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

fyi

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Hansen's latest:

‘Beijing Jim’ Hansen: Sea Level Rise of Many Metres This Century “Almost Dead Certain”

And a reply to it :

Commentary- Hansen Draft Paper: Paleoclimate Implications for Human-Made Climate Change

[steelyourfaith]

Ernest_at_the_Beach, Thanx !

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[SunkenCiv]

The GISP2 Greenland ice core has proven to be a great source of climatic data from the geologic past. Ancient temperatures can be measured using oxygen isotopes in the ice and ages can be determined from annual dust accumulation layers in the ice... The age of each sample is accurately known from annual dust layers in the ice core. The top of the core is 1987. The d18O data clearly show remarkable swings in climate over the past 100,000 years. In just the past 500 years, Greenland warming/cooling temperatures fluctuated back and forth about 40 times, with changes every 25-30 years (27 years on the average). None of these changes could have been caused by changes in atmospheric CO2 because they predate the large CO2 emissions that began about 1945. Nor can the warming of 1915 to 1945 be related to CO2, because it pre-dates the soaring emissions after 1945. Thirty years of global cooling (1945 to 1977) occurred during the big post-1945 increase in CO2.

Thanks Ernest_at_the_Beach!

· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·

[SunkenCiv]

· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach · · join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·
	Antiquity Journal  & archive  Archaeologica  Archaeology  Archaeology Channel  BAR  Bronze Age Forum  Discover  Dogpile  Eurekalert  Google  LiveScience  Mirabilis.ca  Nat Geographic  PhysOrg  Science Daily  Science News  Texas AM  Yahoo  Excerpt, or Link only?	Thanks Ernest_At_The_Beach! To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword · · Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·

[Miss_Meyet]

...If CO2 is indeed the cause of global warming, then global temperatures should mirror the rise in CO2...

Well, one would think. I have reached the very sad conclusion that many of today's so-called "scientists" (and I also include many medical researchers here) cannot discern the difference between coincidence and correlation.

I, of course, have absolutely no proof for this theory.
;)

[Dilbert56]

Could you imagine the headlines back in those days?

"Temperatures drop unexpectedly.

[Marine_Uncle]

The flow of information coming forth in easy to read form should further help US Rep Daryl Issa and his staff formulate solid arguments as to why the EPA must stop any restrictions related to carbon dioxide emissions.
Then they can start to go after the NASA GISS gang. Public relations is important. They must make it a point to inform the L/MSM and public via. various means as to why the CO2 issue should finally be put to rest, forever. And why Carbon Trading Exchanges are simply schemes to cripple industry as well as our over all economic condition from really getting totally out of whack.

[djf]

The data looks correct, and seems to jive with the Vostok Ice core data.

Is there global warming? Yes.
Is it man made? Hell no.

The same cycles have repeated over and over for the last 1.2 million years or so.

And the chart says it best: on the left, it says we are in the “Holocene interglacial”

We are right now in the “interglacial maximum”. It’s gonna get colder, folks. Much colder. Cold enough that all the ideas and dreams about “Well, I’ll just grow a few tomato plants...” well, thats pretty much a fantasy.
Not yet, maybe, but in the next 5-15 thousand years.

[aruanan]

Not yet, maybe, but in the next 5-15 thousand years.

If in the next 5-15 thousand years, it'll be delayed between about 50-150% of the length of the typical interglacial of the last five (including this one, that is the longest and coolest of them)

[listenhillary]

“Not yet, maybe, but in the next 5-15 thousand years.”

You are making it really hard to scare people into modifying their behavior saying things like that. (/sarcasm off)

[ElkGroveDan]

This data is totally unreliable. It hasn't been “adjusted” yet. </sarcasm>

[SouthTexas]

Several years ago, someone produced data that showed pre-historic O2/CO2 levels. Data was retrieved from bubbles in amber.

Wonder if they can extract that from the ice cores?

[ForGod'sSake]

I’m like, you know, totally mortified; sortof. Why, this Watts guy doesn’t even have a PhD!!! The horror! And this Easterbrook fellow is obviously out of his element. What can a man credentialed with a PhD in geology possibly know about global war..., er, climate change. He just HAS to have rocks in his head. What’s he doing digging around in iceholes anyway? Looking for more rocks; har??? I’m just horrified that anyone would pay attention to these two Neandertahls who obviously have a hidden agenda. I mean really, anyone wanting to kill algore’s cash cow must be a fruitcake, or dimwitted or worse. Maybe TEA Partiers or something. They might be pursuing real science which will not allow the glob.., er, proper infrastructure to be put in place. They just don’t understand that without global governance to mitigate the coming climate change, whichever way it goes, we could all just, well, never mind...

[The Comedian]

OK, so answer the following question:

Are we all gonna die?

[] Yes

[] No

[] Maybe

[] There isn't even enough time left to choose any of the above answers

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[colorado tanker]

A few months ago I engaged in an extended email debate on a college alumni board with some alarmists. I laid out all the ice core data and other scientific arguments against AGW. Over and over. It was like talking to a wall. All I got back was "science" and "settled" and it's been warming since 1850, the world began industrializing about that time, therefore human industrialization causes global warming. Q.E.D.

I finally gave up and left them with my benediction, post hoc ergo propter hoc.