Skip to comments.
No evidence of time before Big Bang
Nature ^
| 12/10/10
| Edwin Cartlidge
Posted on 12/12/2010 8:51:25 AM PST by LibWhacker
Latest research deflates the idea that the Universe cycles for eternity.
Our view of the early Universe may be full of mysterious circles and even triangles but that doesn't mean we're seeing evidence of events that took place before the Big Bang. So says a trio of papers taking aim at a recent claim that concentric rings of uniform temperature within the cosmic microwave background the radiation left over from the Big Bang might, in fact, be the signatures of black holes colliding in a previous cosmic 'aeon' that existed before our Universe.
(Excerpt) Read more at nature.com ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: background; bigbang; cosmic; microwave; penrose; science; steadystatetheory; stringtheory; time; universe; wmap; xplanets
To: LibWhacker
But, it takes a licking and keeps on ticking.
2
posted on
12/12/2010 8:55:13 AM PST
by
righttackle44
(I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
To: LibWhacker
There was no “aeon” before the universe. There is only one universe. Discussing “time” before the universe is meaningless.
They still don’t have a clue.
3
posted on
12/12/2010 8:55:35 AM PST
by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(Liberalism is against human nature. Practicing liberalism is detrimental to your mental stability.)
To: LibWhacker
What a coinkydink! Something in common with Obama’s birth certificate! /s
4
posted on
12/12/2010 9:02:14 AM PST
by
pillut48
(Israel doesn't have a friend in President Obama...and neither does the USA! (h/t pgkdan))
To: LibWhacker
Well, the evidence of the Big Bang itself is only circumstantial.
5
posted on
12/12/2010 9:07:59 AM PST
by
Brilliant
To: LibWhacker
Actually, those rings are from the stump left when an evil dwarf chopped down the great tree Yggdrasil.
6
posted on
12/12/2010 9:08:31 AM PST
by
dr_who
To: LibWhacker
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
7
posted on
12/12/2010 9:17:33 AM PST
by
Flag_This
(Real presidents don't bow.)
To: LibWhacker
didn’t a guy win a Nobel prize for that “discovery” they are casting doubt on??
8
posted on
12/12/2010 9:20:59 AM PST
by
GeronL
(#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged
There is only one universe. Discussing time before the universe is meaningless. I'm not sure about the "only one" assertion but the "meaningless" assertion is undoubtedly correct for any number of good reasons. At the moment of creation, the big bang if you will, total entropy was zero. That would prevent any possible transfer of information post BB.
Regards,
GtG
9
posted on
12/12/2010 9:25:40 AM PST
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: Gandalf_The_Gray
10
posted on
12/12/2010 9:29:11 AM PST
by
Michael Barnes
(Guilty of being White.)
To: LibWhacker
The used to call “big bangs” orgies back in the day.
11
posted on
12/12/2010 9:30:42 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
To: SunkenCiv
12
posted on
12/12/2010 9:32:58 AM PST
by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: LibWhacker
"Our view of the early Universe may be full of mysterious circles "
Seen those here on Earth.
13
posted on
12/12/2010 9:41:20 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: LibWhacker
Before Thyme there was Rosemary!
14
posted on
12/12/2010 9:43:31 AM PST
by
Young Werther
("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged
No doubt, but if that hypothesis is wrong then how about this one ~ those are MOUNTING BRACKETS
15
posted on
12/12/2010 9:50:19 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: LibWhacker
This is true.
The BIG CLOCK came right AFTER the BIG BANG.
16
posted on
12/12/2010 9:50:21 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: Young Werther
Oh, you’re just sayin’ that ‘cause of your Lemon Zest.
17
posted on
12/12/2010 9:54:15 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: dr_who
It is obvious you’ve lost too much life before the Goblin Fire.
18
posted on
12/12/2010 9:56:36 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: LibWhacker
One of the titles of God is ‘Creator’. A creator presupposes a creation. If God the Creator is eternal then the universe, in some fashion or form, must also be eternal.
19
posted on
12/12/2010 10:05:21 AM PST
by
JPG
(Sarah dedicated her new book to Trig: "I'm glad you're here.")
To: GeronL
Posited by Penrose and Gurzadyan only very recently. No time for Nobels yet.
To: Young Werther
Definitely two of my favorite herbs!
To: dr_who
Tha’ be nonsense. T’was nae an *evil* dwarf. Th’ tree be th’ source of evil.
22
posted on
12/12/2010 10:13:40 AM PST
by
BenKenobi
(Obama's book of the month, Herman Melville's Killin' Whitey)
To: LibWhacker
The 'concept' of time has always fascinated me. What ever 'force' or 'being' created both us and the universe gave us atomic particles that can decay in milliseconds; our individual lives are measured in mere years; and the universe as far as we have determined at this point is roughly 14 or 15 billion years old.
How can that be? What is the purpose of creating a life form that exists mere years in a universe that will continue for perhaps billions of years or forever?
Very strange.
23
posted on
12/12/2010 10:45:43 AM PST
by
Doc Savage
(Stay Thirsty My Friend!!)
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
aaahhh... must have confused him with the guy who explained why background radiation is spread all over the universe and not localized where the big bang happened. Because everywhere was where it happened and then expanded outwar.
Something like that.
25
posted on
12/12/2010 10:49:36 AM PST
by
GeronL
(#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
26
posted on
12/12/2010 11:19:07 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: KoRn; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
27
posted on
12/12/2010 11:21:56 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: LibWhacker
Even if information survived the theoretical singularity during the big bang which is questionable. It would be so distorted by a multitude of forces we cannot even model that it’s completely useless.
28
posted on
12/12/2010 11:36:08 AM PST
by
allmost
To: Doc Savage; LibWhacker; SunkenCiv
Time is just a reference (point) in (this) physical reality. A part of the creation. After you die you exist in a “no time” environment.
What is the life expectancy of a fresh baked cookie compared to the entire prep time? That includes all the processes. From growing the grain, raising the cane, down the line to actually mixing them in a bowl and baking. See what I mean?
29
posted on
12/12/2010 12:00:34 PM PST
by
bigheadfred
(STAND IN THE CLOSET AND SCREAM WITH ME)
To: allmost
Yeah, it’d be interesting to see the math that says ripples from a previous aeon could somehow survive into this one.
To: LibWhacker
No evidence of doing time before Big Bang -
Sing Sing hadn`t been sung yet.
To: SunkenCiv; betty boop; Alamo-Girl
Fascinating . . .
time before time . . .
32
posted on
12/12/2010 12:47:03 PM PST
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Doc Savage
It´s possible that God cares for many life forms throughout the universe; particularly those that have abstracted information from their environment thus to know Him.
33
posted on
12/12/2010 1:11:01 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: GeronL
didnt a guy win a Nobel prize for that discovery they are casting doubt on?? One reason that is unlikely is that IIRC Nobels are supposed to be given for discoveries that might have some practical application.
To: Doc Savage
>>Very strange.
Even stranger when one considers that Time is a derivative function of state-change that progresses relative to E within the inertial frame(s) in which it is observed.
As E approaches infinity an eternity could pass within a single blink of an unmoved eye...
35
posted on
12/12/2010 2:20:44 PM PST
by
LomanBill
(Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
To: SunkenCiv
Thanks for the ping. This seems to have kind of a high duhh factor to me.
36
posted on
12/12/2010 2:30:17 PM PST
by
Kevmo
(Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: LibWhacker
No evidence of Time before Big Bang No, but I think Newsweek was around.
To: Quix
I’ve got a recent magazine around here (somewhere) with an article about the search for traces of the previous universe.
38
posted on
12/12/2010 2:34:55 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Kevmo
39
posted on
12/12/2010 2:37:36 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: MHGinTN
I haven’t gobbled any fire lately. Doesn’t settle very well in my stomach.
40
posted on
12/12/2010 3:46:01 PM PST
by
dr_who
To: BenKenobi
Damn trees. I hate ‘em. They’re too friggin tall.
41
posted on
12/12/2010 3:48:09 PM PST
by
dr_who
To: LibWhacker
Imagine a time ....when there was no time ...when all the MATTER and ENERGY that goes into both you ...me... the waiter ...and this crispy, succulent, delicious apple pie... indeed, all of yumanity ...was compressed into a small singularity Billions and Billions of times smaller than something really friggin' tiny.
42
posted on
12/12/2010 4:00:30 PM PST
by
dr_who
To: SunkenCiv
Interesting.
It’s always fascinating to me to read such pontificating piles of conjecture and assumption.
WE are sooooooooooooooooooooooooo finite on such a finite ball . . .
with such limited tools
yet our ‘experts’
are quite glib about saying
what CERTAINLY must have happened eons ago and light years away.
Arrogance gone to seed, imho.
43
posted on
12/12/2010 4:37:35 PM PST
by
Quix
(Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
To: Young Werther
44
posted on
12/12/2010 4:39:37 PM PST
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: Quix
To: bigheadfred
Does quantum gravity have something to do with human consciousness and thought processes?
I wonder if our mind is connected to the quantum loops, and that neural processes are not only based on the electro-magnetic spectrum. Maybe thought produces waves in quantum fields that transcend time as we know it.
Penrose says something about this in his books — that the mind seems to transcend Newtonian physics.
If thought is connected to timeless quantum realm then maybe that explains our yearning for heaven, our inkling for eternity as expresses in art and religion or faith. It is our connection to God.
The new physics could provide scientific evidence for the existence of an eternal human soul that is able to survive this time-space universe and pass into another after death.
Heaven could be another universe designed to accept the information of our being after the destruction of our physical body.
Maybe the window into the other universe is human consciousness sparked by faith in God’s relation.
46
posted on
12/14/2010 9:29:26 PM PST
by
garjog
To: garjog
Nicely put.
And I think heaven is just another step in the infinite chain.
47
posted on
12/15/2010 6:59:02 AM PST
by
bigheadfred
(STAND IN THE CLOSET AND SCREAM WITH ME)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson