Skip to comments.
Cosmic accelerators discovered in our galaxy by UCLA physicists, Japanese colleague
University of California - Los Angeles ^
| August 17, 2010
| Stuart Wolpert
Posted on 08/17/2010 12:38:48 PM PDT by decimon
Physicists from UCLA and Japan have discovered evidence of "natural nuclear accelerators" at work in our Milky Way galaxy, based on an analysis of data from the world's largest cosmic ray detector.
The research is published Aug. 20 in the journal Physical Review Letters.
Cosmic rays of the highest energies were believed by physicists to come from remote galaxies containing enormous black holes capable of consuming stars and accelerating protons at energies comparable to that of a bullet shot from a rifle. These protons referred to individually as "cosmic rays" travel through space and eventually enter our galaxy.
But earlier this year, physicists using the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina, the world's largest cosmic ray observatory, published a surprising discovery: Many of the energetic cosmic rays found in the Milky Way are not actually protons but nuclei and the higher the energy, the greater the nuclei-to-proton ratio.
"This finding was totally unexpected because the nuclei, more fragile than protons, tend to disintegrate into protons on their long journey through space," said Alexander Kusenko, UCLA professor of physics and astronomy and co-author of the Physical Review Letters research. "Moreover, it is very unlikely that a cosmic accelerator of any kind would accelerate nuclei better than protons at these high energies."
The resolution to the paradox of the nuclei's origin comes from an analysis by Kusenko; Antoine Calvez, a UCLA graduate student of physics who is part of Kusenko's research group; and Shigehiro Nagataki, an associate professor of physics at Japan's Kyoto University. They found that stellar explosions in our own galaxy can accelerate both protons and nuclei. But while the protons promptly leave the galaxy, the heavier and less mobile nuclei become trapped in the turbulent magnetic field and linger longer.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsroom.ucla.edu ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; haltonarp; science; stringtheory
1
posted on
08/17/2010 12:38:50 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
08/17/2010 12:39:33 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
Can any of these particles be man-made?
3
posted on
08/17/2010 12:44:24 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)
To: BenLurkin
"Can any of these particles be man-made?"
Why yes, they can indeed...
4
posted on
08/17/2010 12:46:31 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Now what kind of a geroo are you anyway?)
To: Bean Counter
Now that’s a great animation of my favorite ex president
5
posted on
08/17/2010 12:53:51 PM PDT
by
Helotes
To: decimon
I used to think I knew stuff. I used to think that nuclei contained protons, and that protons were essentially hydrogen nuclei. I also used to think that cosmic rays were high-energy photons. Given these prior misconceptions, I’m having difficulty understanding what the #&*@ these people are talking about.
6
posted on
08/17/2010 12:58:03 PM PDT
by
webheart
(I am a Sarah fan.)
To: webheart
I think that nuclei used to be protons and neutrons. But that was in an earlier time.
7
posted on
08/17/2010 1:03:17 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: webheart; decimon
"Cosmic rays are high energy charged particles, originating in outer space, that travel at nearly the speed of light and strike the Earth from all directions. Most cosmic rays are the nuclei of atoms, ranging from the lightest to the heaviest elements in the periodic table. Cosmic rays also include high energy electrons, positrons, and other subatomic particles. The term "cosmic rays" usually refers to galactic cosmic rays, which originate in sources outside the solar system, distributed throughout our Milky Way galaxy. However, this term has also come to include other classes of energetic particles in space, including nuclei and electrons accelerated in association with energetic events on the Sun (called solar energetic particles), and particles accelerated in interplanetary space." http://www.srl.caltech.edu/personnel/dick/cos_encyc.html Cosmic rays may broadly be divided into two categories, primary and secondary. The cosmic rays that arise in extrasolar astrophysical sources are primary cosmic rays; these primary cosmic rays can interact with interstellar matter to create secondary cosmic rays. The sun also emits low energy cosmic rays associated with solar flares. The exact composition of primary cosmic rays, outside the Earth's atmosphere, is dependent on which part of the energy spectrum is observed. However, in general, almost 90% of all the incoming cosmic rays are protons, about 9% are helium nuclei (alpha particles) and nearly 1% are electrons. The ratio of hydrogen to helium nuclei (28% helium by mass) is about the same as the primordial elemental abundance ratio of these elements (24% by mass He) in the universe. The remaining fraction is made up of the other heavier nuclei which are abundant end products of stars' nuclear synthesis. Secondary cosmic rays consist of the other nuclei which are not abundant nuclear synthesis end products, or products of the Big Bang, primarily lithium, beryllium, and boron. These light nuclei appear in cosmic rays in much greater abundance (about 1:100 particles) than in solar atmospheres, where their abundance is about 10−7 that of helium. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Man! After all these years I still can't get a straight answer!
8
posted on
08/17/2010 1:23:18 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: decimon
Stellar explosions capable of accelerating particles to ultra-high energies have been seen in other galaxies, where they produce gamma-ray bursts. The new analysis provides evidence that such powerful explosions occur in our galaxy as well, at least a few times per million years, Kusenko said.Once every 27 million?
9
posted on
08/17/2010 1:57:40 PM PDT
by
frithguild
(Joe Wilson was wrong when he shouted "You lie!" Obama doesn't just lie - he lies all the time.)
To: sinanju
Man! After all these years I still can't get a straight answer! Cuz space is curved. ;-)
10
posted on
08/17/2010 1:58:32 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
Cosmic-nucleonic-protonic-astronomic-cyclotronic ping!
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
11
posted on
08/17/2010 2:12:23 PM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: decimon
Cosmic rays of the highest energies were believed by physicists to come from remote galaxies containing enormous black holes capable of consuming stars and accelerating protons at energies comparable to that of a bullet shot from a rifle. Weight of a Proton: 1.6726 X 10-27 kg
Weight of a Remington .223 caliber bullet 0.00356394 kg
Given the difference in weights I find the statement in the article to unimaginable.
12
posted on
08/17/2010 2:18:11 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
To: Pontiac
You didn't use a accelerator for the 62gr .223.
The .223 inside a 308 sabot, loaded into a 300 WM brass.
To: decimon; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
14
posted on
08/17/2010 8:18:24 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: Pontiac
Given the difference in weights I find the statement in the article to unimaginable. I hear you. A single proton can have the kinetic energy of the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs. And much more than that if you push it close enough to the speed of light.
Relativistic kinetic energy is given by:
In fact, as you can see, Ek approaches infinity as v --> c, which is one of the reasons c is the absolute speed limit for objects with mass moving through space.
15
posted on
08/17/2010 9:23:40 PM PDT
by
LibWhacker
(America awake!)
To: decimon
No luck hunting for the abstract.
16
posted on
08/18/2010 12:10:06 AM PDT
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: Bean Counter
Bean...that is awesome...anyway it can be blown up and posted under it’s own thread maybe? Very cool....
17
posted on
08/18/2010 12:15:39 AM PDT
by
caww
To: Deaf Smith
18
posted on
08/18/2010 3:02:29 AM PDT
by
Pontiac
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson