Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New book says wrong clothing, not winter led to Hitler's 1941 defeat in Russia
ANI ^ | Jul 26, 2009 | Unknown

Posted on 07/26/2009 5:55:44 AM PDT by decimon

British historian Andrew Roberts has claimed in a new book -- The Storm of War -- that wrong clothing and not ghastly wintry conditions led to Germany's defeat in Russia in 1941.

In an extract from his new book, Roberts claims that Hitler's troops were fatally ill equipped for the 1941 invasion of Russia.

He also blames dictator Adolf Hitler for that defeat, saying the Nazi leader failed to take care of his troops' needs and was more proud of his hardiness in the cold, boasting how "having to change into long trousers was always a misery to me."

Prior to Operation Barbarossa, the Nazis were not so certain that their invasion of Russia, which began on June 22, 1941, would take place in a very cold winter.

The mistake that the German commissariat made was that they did not organize enough woollen hats, gloves, long johns and overcoats for use in Russia, reports The Telegraph.

(Excerpt) Read more at in.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: bookreview; godsgravesglyphs; militaryhistory; nazi; pages; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-82 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2009 5:55:44 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon

Attacking Stalingrad instead of going after the oil fields was a biggie


2 posted on 07/26/2009 5:58:50 AM PDT by GeronL (Guilty of the crime of deviationism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Uh, is it just me or is this pretty much obvious?

Hitler should have just had summer weather that winter.


3 posted on 07/26/2009 5:59:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I read a very interesting book that theorized Hitler attacked Stalin because Stalin was about to attack him. The Germans did not have the luxury of choosing the date.


4 posted on 07/26/2009 6:00:37 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Best,

Chris

5 posted on 07/26/2009 6:02:48 AM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: section9

I can’t remember the book’s name. It was written by a former Soviet military intelligence officer (who defected). He claims that Soviet intelligence was monitoring the wool market (and wool production) in Germany for indications the German military was asking for heavy clothing.


6 posted on 07/26/2009 6:06:45 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Adolf's biggie was canceling his non aggression pact with Stalin...it did many things...it turned American leftist against Hitler, while before they put up with the ally of their lord a master Uncle Joe Stalin...and the real biggie was that Hitler now had to fight 2 fronts.

He would have eventually beaten Britain...America would have stayed out of hitlers hair...and afterward he could have taken Soviet Russia at his leisure. No it was Hitlers massive ignorance of battle tactics that lost him the war...not clothing.

7 posted on 07/26/2009 6:06:53 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

8 posted on 07/26/2009 6:07:02 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Once again, the importance of dressing for success.


9 posted on 07/26/2009 6:08:20 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

The clothes make the man or winner/loser/POW/dead.


10 posted on 07/26/2009 6:11:07 AM PDT by wally_bert (My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I think being ill-equipped in the dead of winter after years of war have torn apart the continent is a good example of a ghastly winter condition.


11 posted on 07/26/2009 6:11:36 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

I guess!


12 posted on 07/26/2009 6:12:16 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The truth is that Hitler was out generaled. He failed to grasp the depth of the Soviet army and attacked with an inadequate force.

Cold and clothes were inconsequential to the defeat.


13 posted on 07/26/2009 6:13:46 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The boy's war iin Dor tetriot has already cost more then the war in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Kind of a chicken versus egg analysis. Hitler’s troops were unprepared for winter and lacked proper clothing or equipment. Russian winters are typically brutal. I could kind of see it both ways.


14 posted on 07/26/2009 6:16:48 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Hitler’s biggest mistake was in attacking the Jews.

Jewish people were German patriots and his brain trust. They would have fought and worked for him. Instead they were rounded up and slaughtered.

No one can blame any one thing for the loss of a war, it takes many things working as a chain. Each link in the chain adds to the loss.

I often wonder what would have happened in Europe had Japan not attacked the US. Suppose Japan instead of attacking the US had gone to meet Hitlers Armies with their seapower and transported them across the Channel?


15 posted on 07/26/2009 6:16:57 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Suvorov


16 posted on 07/26/2009 6:18:04 AM PDT by Cheburashka (Nanny states don't come cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Mercy is for the weak.

honk

17 posted on 07/26/2009 6:20:18 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: decimon
It was not just the absence of proper winter clothing, it was the length of the winter as well as the severity of it; it was the depth of the snow and the depth of the mud; it was the attenuated supply lines which ran through 1000 miles of territory made hostile by the local populations who became partisan in reaction to Hitler's brutal occupation policies; it was the wider treads on the Soviet tanks and vehicles which could better negotiate in the snow and mud; it was the unanticipated immense industrial capacity of Russia which came increasingly into play; it was the great disparity in numbers enjoyed by the Russians; it was that the Germans had to fight a three front war; it was the sheer brutality of the Soviets to their own forces as well as the Germans and an infinite capacity to absorb casualties.


18 posted on 07/26/2009 6:24:40 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka; All
Yes! Here it is, I recommend the following book to everyone. It's a great read for those who prefer their war histories to have lots and lots of numbers:

Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start World War II.

I suspect Suvorov would make this author look like an idiot.
19 posted on 07/26/2009 6:25:12 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I read a very interesting book that theorized Hitler attacked Stalin because Stalin was about to attack him. The Germans did not have the luxury of choosing the date.

What ever book that was got it wrong. Not only did Germany choose the date, they caught the Russians(at least Stalin)totally by surprise. They spent months moving troops up to the Russian border. Stalin dismissed this because he believed Hitler to be a rational man, making a huge mistake by doing so.

20 posted on 07/26/2009 6:25:43 AM PDT by calex59 (I, me, myself, am actually Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: calex59

I suggest you read the book in my comment #19. Suvorov proves that the Soviets were only caught by surprise in the sense they were deployed to attack and not defend, resulting in the rapid German advance at the onset.


21 posted on 07/26/2009 6:33:52 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: decimon
...British historian Andrew Roberts has claimed in a new book -- The Storm of War -- that wrong clothing and not ghastly wintry conditions led to Germany's defeat in Russia in 1941...

Sorry Mr. Roberts, but it WAS the wintry conditions that led to the defeat. Had it NOT been for the wintry conditions the German's "wrong" clothing would have been ok. Sheesh.

22 posted on 07/26/2009 6:36:38 AM PDT by FReepaholic (Jump You F**kers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Another example of logistical supply lines not being able to keep up with the forward advance of the invading army. Once beyond paved roads and rail lines that could be comandeered, the resupply from behind was badly bogged down.

When Patton made his second crossing of the Rhine, one of the things he prepared for was that the rear eschelon quartermaster supply lines were to be kept full and to keep on coming. Supply trucks (the ‘Red Ball Express’) did not make return trips when they had delivered their loads. When they ran out of fuel, they waited there for resupply from behind for refueling and reloading of more vital supplies.

Any number of Studebakers and Dodges and GMCs got used up in that forward rush. And in 1946, most of them were simply abandoned, or sold for nominal prices, to the Germans and Austrians, who used these vehicles to get commerce moving again in their war-torn countries.


23 posted on 07/26/2009 6:37:01 AM PDT by alloysteel (Never let an inanimate object know that you are in a hurry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Like saying that it was the lack of an oven mitt and not the hot pan that burned you.

Germany started the campaign 2 months late due to Italy’s blunder in Yugoslavia and Greece. What was left was an impossible time line.

The winters of the early 40’s were much, much colder than average.

German uniforms and other supplies did not count on a winter campaign or a protracted campaign of any kind.

Hitler refused to hold up the attack and allow his generals to choose good defensive ground.


24 posted on 07/26/2009 6:38:27 AM PDT by SampleMan (Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

There is no doubt clothing played a part, but it was merely a symptom, not the actual disease.

The Russians were brutal enough to afford losses of 10 to 1 and did. (I don’t know the actual numbers, however, I do know what the Russians did in battle)

There were some huge tactical mistakes made, one of which was attacking without consideration of the logistics involved.

Most of the mistakes that were made in Russia, though, can be traced directly to Hitler trying to run the Russian front.


25 posted on 07/26/2009 6:39:28 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: decimon

>>>>”wrong clothing..... not winter”>

?????????

That is nonsensical!


26 posted on 07/26/2009 6:46:11 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Hitler should have waited for Global Warming before attacking.


27 posted on 07/26/2009 6:47:13 AM PDT by Codeflier (We just had 8 more years of a democrat president in office, we already know what happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Too bad he DELAYED the invasion by 6 weeks to help out Mussolini.


28 posted on 07/26/2009 7:04:31 AM PDT by 2harddrive (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Suvorov’s “Icebreaker” is at best hard to believe. I’ve not seen any other source claiming that Uncle Joe had set up the Krauts.
After reading the book, I wondered if perhaps Suvorov had become a Stalin apologist. But even if that is not the case, if Stalin was planning to go on the offensive, why did he purge the Red Army, eliminating such luminaries as Tukchevsky, leading theorist of the Deep Attack?


29 posted on 07/26/2009 7:10:26 AM PDT by MadJack ("Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet." (Afghan proverb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

bttt


30 posted on 07/26/2009 7:12:28 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Not to mention also the mass murder Hitler did in the USSR, especially on Jews in Ukraine. Many Russians and Ukrainians thought the Germans were their salvation from the Soviets. They were ready to assist.

And as to the cold, a Russian i know said they have a saying. “Its not that a Siberian can stand the cold better than anyone else, they just know how to dress correctly for it.”


31 posted on 07/26/2009 7:15:16 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Stalin was not caught by surprise. He knew that he could absorb the losses and he didn’t care if the soon to be buffer states got looted, he wanted them to be weaker after the war, that way they would be easier to control.


32 posted on 07/26/2009 7:17:40 AM PDT by Dosa26 (One ring to rule them all and in the darkness bind them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MadJack
The book is worth the read. If you don't feel like forking-over the cash, try to find it in a library somewhere.

Suvorov addresses the purges, but I don't remember how. As for the rest of the book, his conclusions can be accepted or they can not be . . . but he does a pretty good job of challenging some prevailing assumptions.

33 posted on 07/26/2009 7:18:27 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Ref: the purges. One theory is that the SD set up the Soviet General Staff with phony evidence of them as traitors. Stalin, being the raving paranoid he was, did what was anticipated - he eliminated much of the talent the Red Army possessed at the operational level.
Extrapolating from this, there are two plausible reasons for this SD operation - attack the Red Army’s ability to defend the Motherland, or, going along with what you’re saying, attack it’s ability to conduct strategic offensive operations.
I’ll take a look for the book next R&R.


34 posted on 07/26/2009 7:28:06 AM PDT by MadJack ("Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet." (Afghan proverb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: decimon
New book says wrong clothing, not winter led to Hitler's 1941 defeat in Russia

Sounds like British historian Andrew Roberts is a bit of an idiot.

If the winter was not a factor, why in the world would Roberts claim they needed "woollen hats, gloves, long johns and overcoats?"

Sheesh.

35 posted on 07/26/2009 7:32:02 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin_geek

The Russians are said to have had multiple armies in reserve of which the Germans were not aware. Once the Germans were committed into the stalemate at Stalingrad and suffering, their army was enveloped and destroyed.


36 posted on 07/26/2009 7:35:23 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The boy's war iin Dor tetriot has already cost more then the war in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Interesting choice of words. During the late 1930’s heyday of the Nazi era, what we refer to as Indian summer, the glorious weather of early autumn that lingers on, was known in Germany as “Hitler Weather”.


37 posted on 07/26/2009 7:42:11 AM PDT by lbryce (Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Interesting choice of words. During the late 1930’s heyday of the Nazi era, what we refer to as Indian summer, the glorious weather of early autumn that lingers on, was known in Germany as “Hitler Weather”.


38 posted on 07/26/2009 7:42:13 AM PDT by lbryce (Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Hitler’s biggest mistake was being a murdering fascist dictator. Using meth daily was also not a great idea.


39 posted on 07/26/2009 7:47:06 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dosa26
Stalin was caught by surprise. He thought Hitler would not attack him, he reasoned that was he in Hitler's shoes he would not attack Russia. This is documented and written by Stalin himself.

Stalin ignored the build up on the border because of that reasoning.

However, he used the age old Russian tactic of retreating until winter set in, he knew Hitler's supply lines would stretch out, he moved his factories out of range of Hitlers short range two engine bombers, he built the T34, which was better than the existing German main tank, the MarkIV, forcing Hitler to build a new tank(two in fact), he built new aircraft, among them the Sturmovich(spelling?)which were better than Germany's planes.

Although the T34 was a good tank it was not better than the soon to appear Tiger and Panther models, however Stalin did what America did to win the war, he out produced Hitler.

Hitler also made a huge mistake in killing off Russian civilians who at first thought Germany was a savior for them. Hitler made a lot of mistakes but he didn't attack Russia because Russia was planing on attacking Germany, they weren't. Hitler thought they were because that is what he would do.

40 posted on 07/26/2009 8:08:01 AM PDT by calex59 (I, me, myself, am actually Jim Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I think that attacking Stalingrad was almost a military necessity. It would have been extremely dangerous to leave a military center to your rear as you advance deep into the Caucuses. OTOH, if you could take Stalingrad you could hold it with far fewer troops than it would take to cordon the area, like a seige.


41 posted on 07/26/2009 8:09:54 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

I think they could have put more resources into the mission after it changed to attacking Stalingrad. But they didn’t.


42 posted on 07/26/2009 8:13:35 AM PDT by GeronL (Guilty of the crime of deviationism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: decimon
I have never seen any authoritative, scholarly reference, validation for my very own personal deduction that it was Mussolini's ill-fated military campaign in the Balkans, forcing Hitler to postpone the Russian timetable from early April, 1941 to late June in order to secure the Balkans, in effectively having Germany lose the Soviet campaign and the war itself.

Had Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa n April, 1941 as initially planned, the crucial months of fighting would have taken place when the weather would not have been the disastrously mitigating factor in Germany's defeat. The Germans were forced to fight in the worst winter in a hundred years, the cold so fierce to have caused fatal rupture of the intestines when soldiers' relieving themselves.

http://www.worldwar2database.com/html/greece.htm
Italy was at once awed and jealous of the German successes in 1940, and Mussolini declared war on Britain and France on June 10. Stagnated in France until the German victory, the Italians looked to the Southeast for something they could claim as their own prize. 200,000 Italian soldiers attacked Greece from Italian Albania on October 28, 1940. The Greek Army proved much tougher than Mussolini or his generals expected. Not only was the Italian advance smashed, the Italians were expelled from Greece and driven back to Albania . Hitler was furious; Mussolini had not bothered to inform him of the invasion. As Hitler planned to attack the Soviet Union in the Spring of 1941, the Italian advance had left his southern flank critically exposed. Now he had to postpone the Russian timetable in order to secure the Balkans. Hitler’s forces attacked Greece and Yugoslavia on April 6, 1941. The Metaxas Line, fortresses on the Greek-Bulgarian border, stopped the Germans until Yugoslavia fell on April 17. Then the Germans could move into Greece from Yugoslavia and surrounded the Greek positions. Hitler still had to shift forces preparing for the invasion of Russia to collapse the Greek Resistance. The whole Peloponnesian peninsula was overrun and Athens fell on April 27.

43 posted on 07/26/2009 8:14:35 AM PDT by lbryce (Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

The thing that greatly contributed Hitler’s defeat in the Soviet Union was the unplanned move into the Balkans. The operation started in the Spring of ‘41 with the invasion of Yugoslvia, Albania, Greece, and ended witht he airborne assault of Crete. This pushed back the timetable for the invasion of the Soviet Union.

Italy’s ill-considered move into Albania precipitated the Brits reinforcing Greece from Egypt. Hitler countered by sending his mobile forces into the Balkans. If the Germans had another several more weeks of good weather in 1941, they might have taken some of their strategic objectives before really bad weather set in. Maintenance of the Objective.


44 posted on 07/26/2009 8:19:06 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Another huge problem was they left for a quick victory and the vehicles were ill prepared. They were supposed to be done before winter set in.

Also, as a result, a simple thing called anti-freeze was neglected. When fuel deliveries ran behind, a lot of vehicles were basically internally destroyed.


45 posted on 07/26/2009 8:21:05 AM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I think they could have put more resources into the mission after it changed to attacking Stalingrad. But they didn’t.

I would agree with that. The Germans were trying to meet 2 strategic objectives simultaneously -- seize the Caucuses region, and take Stalingrad. Clearly you couldn't do the former without the latter. Therefore, taking Stalingrad should have had the lion's share of military resources.

46 posted on 07/26/2009 8:26:18 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bert

The Russian “armies” tended to be underequipped for battle. They had the choice of advancing or being killed by the officers behind them. Typically, the soldiers in the forefront of the advance were armed, and, when they were killed, the following soldiers armed themselves by taking weapons from their fallen comrades.


47 posted on 07/26/2009 8:26:47 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Cut off places with no logistical support can be bypassed and starved. Stalingrad was unnecessary militarily, at least the city fighting.

But thank goodness Hitler was drawn into it. All the Nazis killed there werent available to be turned against our boys later. For some real fun, look at a map of the USSR with hitlers high water mark on it. He barely made it into the county, didnt pass the Urals. It was hopeless.

I personally thing the Germans started believing their own BS and thought they simply were invincible.


48 posted on 07/26/2009 8:40:09 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MadJack

Author John Barron stated that Hitler’s Abwher diagnosed Stalin as a paranoid schizophrenic in the thirties and cooked up a false document concerning a military coup, naming all the top Soviet commanders and letting fall into Stalin’s hands.

According to him this is what kicked of Stalin’s devastating purge, decapitating the Red Army.


49 posted on 07/26/2009 8:40:35 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I think I read that part.

Stalin knew that he and Hitler would have to go to war eventually, but he did not anticipate that Hitler would strike when he did.


50 posted on 07/26/2009 8:41:56 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson