Skip to comments.
Biggest black hole in the cosmos discovered (18 billion suns)
New Scientist ^
| 1/10/08
| David Shiga
Posted on 01/10/2008 12:52:18 PM PST by LibWhacker

The quasar OJ287 contains two black holes (this
slightly dated illustration lists the larger black hole's
mass as 17 billion Suns, though researchers now estimate
it is 18 billion Suns). The smaller black hole crashes
through a disc of material around the larger one twice
every orbit, creating bright outbursts (Illustration:
VISPA)
The most massive known black hole in the universe has been discovered, weighing in with the mass of 18 billion Suns. Observing the orbit of a smaller black hole around this monster has allowed astronomers to test Einstein's theory of general relativity with stronger gravitational fields than ever before.
(Excerpt) Read more at space.newscientist.com ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; bigbang; biggest; black; blackhole; dividebyzero; doomsday; gigo; haltonarp; hole; space; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-90 next last
Wow, imagine the fireworks if and when those two merge... 18 billion suns meets 100 million suns...
To: LibWhacker
Don’t want to be within a million light years when that one pulls a gamma ray burst.
2
posted on
01/10/2008 12:56:21 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: LibWhacker
Must...refrain...from...wisecrack...
3
posted on
01/10/2008 12:57:45 PM PST
by
Obadiah
(I don't like to brag - but I'm half bilingual!)
To: LibWhacker
Now we know where all of those carbon offset dollars are going...
4
posted on
01/10/2008 12:57:48 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: LibWhacker
18 billion suns meets 100 million suns... That'll be some family reunion. Is there enough potato salad in the universe?
5
posted on
01/10/2008 12:58:40 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: LibWhacker
We’re finding out now.
Obama and Clinton
6
posted on
01/10/2008 12:58:43 PM PST
by
wastedyears
(This is my BOOMSTICK)
To: wastedyears
18 billion suns can’t be wrong...
7
posted on
01/10/2008 12:59:38 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: Obadiah
he he
Seriously, when these two colide....it will be a huge GRB
8
posted on
01/10/2008 12:59:54 PM PST
by
Halgr
(Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
To: weegee
Better plan to Super-size the casserole dishes.
9
posted on
01/10/2008 1:01:47 PM PST
by
azhenfud
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: LibWhacker
Why hasn’t the smaller been completely swallowed by the larger? The mass and therfore gravitational difference is insane... the orbit of the smaller should degrade quickly I would figure... yet it seems this pair has been doing this dance for quite a while...
To: LibWhacker
I’m sorry . . . I thought this was about Hillary.
11
posted on
01/10/2008 1:04:54 PM PST
by
laweeks
To: LibWhacker
And Bill and Hillary think they are so important.
12
posted on
01/10/2008 1:04:58 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
To: LibWhacker
Hey! Isn’t one of those Michael Moore?
13
posted on
01/10/2008 1:05:11 PM PST
by
chrisser
("Europe has become a theme-park representation of its former self." - Chrisser)
To: weegee
how in hell do they know there are 18 billion?
fuzzy math ?
14
posted on
01/10/2008 1:05:47 PM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: LibWhacker
"
.....adding that the black holes are on track to merge within 10,000 years."
I'm not waiting up with the popcorn.....;-)
15
posted on
01/10/2008 1:06:05 PM PST
by
azhenfud
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: Obadiah
Must...refrain...from...wisecrack...
I was thinking of a dirty crack myself......opps!
16
posted on
01/10/2008 1:06:41 PM PST
by
Mikey_1962
(Liberals want equality of outcome not opportunity.)
To: Halgr; cripplecreek
Even then, the GRB will take millions of years to reach us.
17
posted on
01/10/2008 1:07:13 PM PST
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: LibWhacker
If they collide it would be Bush’s fault.
18
posted on
01/10/2008 1:07:17 PM PST
by
SolidWood
(Al Gore: "I have never heard of this, but I think it is a very good idea,")
To: HamiltonJay
The mother of all Lagrangians must end in a sausage instability.
19
posted on
01/10/2008 1:07:21 PM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Halgr
I’m willing to offer matter offset credits.
20
posted on
01/10/2008 1:07:54 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: SolidWood
Women and children would be hardest hit. Especially suns.
21
posted on
01/10/2008 1:08:20 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: HamiltonJay
Blackholes have immense mass, right? The forces of the smaller one, as it catapults about the larger one, might just be enough to counter the pull for a million or so orbits.
22
posted on
01/10/2008 1:09:08 PM PST
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: Mikey_1962
Did the dirty crack originate on Ura**s?
23
posted on
01/10/2008 1:09:13 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: HamiltonJay
***Why hasnt the smaller been completely swallowed by the larger?***
My question precisely. Unless, the smaller mass has more density by virtue of its diminuition.
24
posted on
01/10/2008 1:09:18 PM PST
by
sodpoodle
(Despair - man's surrender. Laughter - God's reward.)
To: LibWhacker
18 Billion Suns = 18 GigaSuns? Is a standard Sun a unit of measure?
To: CarrotAndStick
Or maybe the universe will have a divide by zero error and we’ll all see the Blue Screen of Death.
26
posted on
01/10/2008 1:09:51 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: LibWhacker
I was trying to think of some sarcastic, witty and clever comment relating this to the size of Herself’s butt or thighs or O’Blama’s coming burnout, etc., but just couldn’t stretch it long enough.
The universe is one big mother.
OK, is this big black hole as dangerous to existance as all leftism and socialism?
I personally have decided that leftism is the most dangerous force in the universe. It destroys everything.
So there.
27
posted on
01/10/2008 1:09:53 PM PST
by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now, courtesy of Islam.)
To: LibWhacker
Is he running for office?
28
posted on
01/10/2008 1:10:48 PM PST
by
Beckwith
(Dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
To: weegee
Any daughter stars?
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
29
posted on
01/10/2008 1:11:23 PM PST
by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: garyhope
30
posted on
01/10/2008 1:11:51 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: LonePalm
31
posted on
01/10/2008 1:12:20 PM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: cripplecreek
I read an article recently that said that when two black holes merge, one-third of the total mass is converted into pure energy. In this case, the energy locked up in the mass of six billion Suns. Presumably, that energy escapes during the collision, though I can’t imagine how. The mind boggles... I don’t know if a million light years would even be a safe distance... Anyone?
32
posted on
01/10/2008 1:13:30 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(Democrats are phony Americans)
To: LibWhacker
This black hole is a whole lot of nothing.
To: advertising guy
how in hell do they know there are 18 billion?
Good questions. Also, why is the more "massive" black hole illustrated as a larger black cirlce and the smaller black hole as a smaller black circle. The way I understood black holes, all accretion goes into a singularity that is by all indications, smaller than an atom. So, shouldn't both black holes be illustrated as being the same size? Perhaps they need a different way of illustrating weight for celestial bodies.
34
posted on
01/10/2008 1:15:01 PM PST
by
adorno
To: LibWhacker
I would have thought the biggest black hole in the universe was either Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson, or Al Sharpton.
To: G L Tirebiter
Yes, it is. Astronomers often speak in terms of how many solar masses an object contains: black holes, giant stars, galaxies, etc.
36
posted on
01/10/2008 1:15:53 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(Democrats are phony Americans)
To: weegee
Why yes, and it has the mass of 18 billion moons.
37
posted on
01/10/2008 1:15:56 PM PST
by
ovrtaxt
(In my fantasy world, the Dems run a Zell Miller/ Lieberman ticket...)
To: wastedyears
Now you've done it !!!
That idiot O'reilly will label us racist again because YOU mentioned Obama in a thread about black holes. /sarcasm
Nam Vet
38
posted on
01/10/2008 1:17:56 PM PST
by
Nam Vet
(Timely reporting from Attila's right flank)
To: adorno
I thought blackholes had a difference in mass, depending on the amount of matter that went into it... more mass absorbed = more massive blackhole, with bigger gravity effects surrounding it.
39
posted on
01/10/2008 1:18:12 PM PST
by
CarrotAndStick
(The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
To: G L Tirebiter
Is a standard Sun a unit of measure?
In fact it is. Although it's usually called a 'solar mass' in astronomy. The sun is used to determine the necessary mass for stellar ignition, calculating novas, neutron stars, supernovas, black holes, etc.
It's the closest, most observable frame of reference we have.
40
posted on
01/10/2008 1:19:13 PM PST
by
zencat
(The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
To: LibWhacker
Crickey a 12647 AU orbital axis and it makes an orbit in 12 years? Holy crap that sucker is moving is FAST. Must be close to 14,000 km/second in orbital velocity.
41
posted on
01/10/2008 1:20:20 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(It's only arrogance if you can't back it up.)
To: LibWhacker
Biggest black hole in the cosmos discovered
42
posted on
01/10/2008 1:21:09 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: CarrotAndStick
I thought blackholes had a difference in mass, depending on the amount of matter that went into it... more mass absorbed = more massive blackhole, with bigger gravity effects surrounding it.
Bigger gravity, yes. But, bigger size? I thought not! If a singularity is of just one size, then the illustration would have to be of equal sizes for both black holes.
43
posted on
01/10/2008 1:21:47 PM PST
by
adorno
To: HamiltonJay
I’m pretty sure they could orbit each other for billions of years, no problem (though this precession business might be sapping energy from the system), just like tiny Pluto has orbited the Sun for 4.5 billion years. It’s only when the orbit decays enough that the smaller black hole begins to smash through the accretion disk of the larger black hole that the orbital decay really accelerates.
44
posted on
01/10/2008 1:21:49 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(Democrats are phony Americans)
To: Obadiah
I am not sure the star registry allows you to name black holes. I was going to name these two Al and Jesse...
45
posted on
01/10/2008 1:21:53 PM PST
by
frithguild
(Credentialed "Arbiter of Conservatism")
To: LibWhacker
Under those types of gravitational forces extremes, ten times all of mankind can be squeezed into the area of a microchip.
Under that amount of pressure, the Empire State Building would easily be squeezed to the size of a human skin cell.
The quasars are so dense, a single drop of the material would weigh 200million tons.
46
posted on
01/10/2008 1:22:05 PM PST
by
shbox
(BobbyHill: "What's the matter with those people, Dad?" HankHill: "They're hippies, son")
To: adorno
The illustration is not of the black hole, proper, but of the event horizon which, of course, is larger for more massive black holes.
47
posted on
01/10/2008 1:23:06 PM PST
by
LibWhacker
(Democrats are phony Americans)
To: adorno
that’s my understanding as well..........
48
posted on
01/10/2008 1:25:25 PM PST
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: zencat; G L Tirebiter
The distance from the Sun to the Earth (one atronomical unit)is also a standard measurement.
49
posted on
01/10/2008 1:27:04 PM PST
by
shbox
(BobbyHill: "What's the matter with those people, Dad?" HankHill: "They're hippies, son")
To: LibWhacker
The illustration is not of the black hole, proper, but of the event horizon which, of course, is larger for more massive black holes.
You might be right, but...
If the event horizon is a major trait of the black hole "environment" why is the accretion disk illustrated and not the event horizon?
50
posted on
01/10/2008 1:28:16 PM PST
by
adorno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson