Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do atoms understand language?
Jon Rappoport's Blog ^ | February 18, 2015 | Jon Rappoport

Posted on 02/19/2015 2:23:41 PM PST by Reverend Saltine

Do atoms understand language?

Are you your brain and nothing else?

If so, mind-control programming is quite reasonable

by Jon Rappoport

February 19, 2015

NoMoreFakeNews.com

“The idea that somewhere in all the stacked-up universes, there might be a little corner that isn’t made out of matter or energy, but is truly independent of, and different from, sub-atomic particles… this idea confounds people, as if it might mean the end of all existence. It might mean a return to the old myths and fairy tales of the horrific priest-classes. It might mean everything science knows will vanish in a puff of smoke. But what if it doesn’t mean any of these things? What if it means that brutal power and domination could die out? What if it means there is an adventure waiting for all of us, beyond any and all pictures of conventional reality?” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Do atoms understand language?

Why ask such a question?

Because it goes to the heart of the slow-motion car crash that conventional physics has been experiencing for the past hundred years.

The question also puts philosophic materialism into a massive dither, from which it can’t hope to recover.

Conventional physics asserts that the universe is made entirely of particles. Atoms. Quarks, wavicles.

The universe includes the human brain.

Here is a sentence: “The Roman Empire collapsed, ushering in a Dark Age, a time of unprecedented chaos.”

Forget the truth or falsity of that sentence. It’s not at issue. What is at issue is the meaning of the sentence. You’re reading it now.

Do you understand it? Do you understand its meaning?

Of course you do. So do I.

But you see, your brain is made of particles that physicists would say have no comprehension of language. None. Zero.

These particles make up rocks, chairs, toothbrushes, asteroids, suns, brains. The same particles.

They have no understanding of sentences or paragraphs or books. No understanding of meaning, as expressed in language.

So?

Understanding of language must come from somewhere else. How can it come from the brain, if the brain is entirely composed of atoms?

“Hello, atom. It rained yesterday, but today it’s supposed to be sunny, and the temperature will reach 70. Do you understand what I’m saying?”

No answer.

“Hello, atom. I find the metaphysics of Kant impenetrable. How about you?”

No answer.

Of course, physicists will dodge and tap dance and offer diverting explanations: “We’re just beginning to understand the mysteries of the brain…we’re making enormous strides…” And this one, my favorite:

“Humans are conscious and understand meaning and language, we know that. And the only place this understanding could possibly come from is the brain. Therefore, the brain is conscious…”

That’s called circular reasoning, which means you assume what you’re claiming to prove. It’s one of the first fallacies a student learns about, when he’s studying logic (if anyone studies logic anymore).

Some “experts” will make this assertion: “There is no such thing as consciousness or understanding. They’re delusions. So it’s quite all right for the brain to be composed of non-conscious atoms…”

In other words, you and I, sharing the words and sentences of this article, are completely deluded into “thinking” that we understand them. We don’t. We’re just machines made of atoms.

If you buy that argument, I’m looking for investors in my new Thorazine-cookie company.

No, I’m afraid the conscious understanding of language is quite real; and that understanding, that knowing, right here and right now, isn’t emanating from the brain, couldn’t be emanating from the brain.

Where it does come from…well, all sorts of opinions can be offered. But one thing is clear. If the whole universe is composed of atoms, and if atoms have no conscious understanding, then consciousness and understanding come from someplace else. A non-atom place.

For example…

From you.

And by you, I mean a non-material being.

Unmeasurable. Unanalyzable.

No big deal. Just the difference between a squashed collapsed view of existence and an infinite view…

Here is a statement attributed to Albert Szent-Gyorgyi, 1937 Nobel Laureate in Physiology and Medicine:

“In my search for the secret of life, I ended up with atoms and electrons which have no life at all. Somewhere along the line, life has run out through my fingers. So, in my old age, I am now retracing my steps…”

How many other scientists would admit they, too, have come to the same crossroad? The deeper they probe, the farther they find themselves from what life is?

How many of them would say, “For the past fifty years, I’ve been quite sure everything is made out of something. Know what I mean? Everything is made out of atoms and electrons and quarks and so on. But those little particles don’t understand anything. They just move through space. Something non-material must possess the quality of being able to understand meaning. And that upsets all applecarts…”

How many scientists would say that?

Again…why does any of this matter? Well, here’s one reason. There is an enormous amount of mind-control brain research occurring all over the world. This research is based on the premise that, when it comes to humans, there is no one home. There is just the brain, and the functions of the brain can be manipulated and carved up and reduced, in order to make “the human machine function normally.”

No problem. No conscience. No guilt. It’s just tinkering with the apparatus.

Welcome to the century of the brain. Welcome to philosophic materialism taken to its obvious conclusion.

Welcome to official insanity.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2015 2:23:41 PM PST by Reverend Saltine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

Does Pi need the universe to exist? Can you imagine a mathematical expression so sophisticated that it’s actually sentient?


2 posted on 02/19/2015 2:39:54 PM PST by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

[ Does Pi need the universe to exist? Can you imagine a mathematical expression so sophisticated that it’s actually sentient? ]

If God is everywhere, does it mean that God is the universe itself and thus is one of the underpinnings of everything much like or is the sentient equation?


3 posted on 02/19/2015 2:47:35 PM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

Posted recently somewhere on this site:

“As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear-headed science, the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.”

Max Planck (1858-1947) Father of Quantum Physics


4 posted on 02/19/2015 2:49:35 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
"Here is a sentence: “The Roman Empire collapsed, ushering in a Dark Age, a time of unprecedented chaos.” Forget the truth or falsity of that sentence. It’s not at issue."

But the author just had to say it. The collapse of the Roman Empire was a good thing.

;-)

Terry Jones - Barbarians - The Primitive Celts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl96VLPCAqw

Terry Jones' Barbarians - The Savage Goths
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtxSeGkeyKk

Barbarians - The End of The World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sI8W5zyTcc

Terry Jones - The Hidden History of Rome
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJDnRN36iT4


5 posted on 02/19/2015 2:49:43 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Thanks for reposting that. I read it last week and couldn’t find it again.


6 posted on 02/19/2015 2:58:03 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

How about the simple idea that God’s world—the spirit world—is apart from and normally inaccessible by the material world.


7 posted on 02/19/2015 2:58:31 PM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

That’s cooL


8 posted on 02/19/2015 3:04:47 PM PST by Reverend Saltine (Don't say, "the administration," or "the EPA"--say "OBAMA." Give him full credit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

Materialist Scientists - “Just give us one miracle and we will explain all the rest”


9 posted on 02/19/2015 3:05:52 PM PST by Bobalu (If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

“Do atoms understand language?”

Language?...Ah, no.


10 posted on 02/19/2015 3:06:18 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

The whole article is juvenile sophistry. It is obvious that consciousness is not an attribute of matter or indeed of any physical thing, and certainly not the “brain” per se.

If it were, then anesthesia would be impossible and consciousness would survive death, but not decay.

Consciousness is itself a process - and is an aggregation of thousands of processes, many of which take place in physical living cells and organs, but consciousness is not in any way physical or material. Of course there is the eternal philosophical “touching” problem that will be discussed without end (not by me), but this author is writing like a third grader when everyone around him is in graduate school.


11 posted on 02/19/2015 3:07:16 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

“stacked up universes”
Sorry. Just one.


12 posted on 02/19/2015 3:10:39 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

“As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear-headed science, the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.”

Max Planck (1858-1947) Father of Quantum Physics


And the recent Higgs Boson discoveries are incomplete.

Imagine that.


13 posted on 02/19/2015 3:10:52 PM PST by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine

G-d.


14 posted on 02/19/2015 3:11:18 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
...(if anyone studies logic anymore).

There are laws against that with heavy penalties.

Good article, thanks.

15 posted on 02/19/2015 3:14:18 PM PST by BikerTrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
Anesthesia works in the realm of your spacetime coordinates, where your soul is using your body to find expression in the spacetime your body senses. The chemistry of anesthesia blocks the process where the soul interacts with the body. The soul exists in a coordinate system which is not effected by the chemistry of anesthesia.

Time is a different expression in that realm, different from that of your body chemistry. Your assertion, indirectly, that consciousness does not survive when the body decays is founded upon nothing that would prove such. With that said, consciousness exists in a coordinate system because without time events do not occur and without space a thing does not exist. Consciousness does exist.

16 posted on 02/19/2015 3:16:41 PM PST by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Saltine
This guy doth protest too much.

God is.

17 posted on 02/19/2015 3:18:21 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Blog: www.BackwoodsEngineer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Whoaah. Dude after reading your post I need a hit.


18 posted on 02/19/2015 3:20:40 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Here’s the deal from my search.

The conclusion of the “scientific” endeavor is to embrace uncertainty.

This leads you to Buddhism, and they are all for that. Secular humanism and moral relativism et al.

Just watch endless hours of Joseph Campbell as I have.

Fred Allen Wolfe has plenty to say as well.

Ultimately their logic fails, but for me, I needed to go through the process and play it out to end.

If consciousness is material, and evolution is true, then there is no such thing as “right or wrong”. They can’t escape this.


19 posted on 02/19/2015 3:30:26 PM PST by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
Does Pi need the universe to exist?

Pi is so two dimensional...all us 3D kids hate him.

20 posted on 02/19/2015 3:31:57 PM PST by BikerTrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson