Posted on 11/06/2012 7:23:25 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
The reason is simple. Unlike a parliamentary system in which governments are formed by coalitions of large and small parties, our electoral system is a first-past-the-post, winner-take-all one in which a winning presidential candidate just needs to get more than 50% of the vote. This means each contending "major" party is itself a coalition that needs to assemble enough diverse voting groups within it to get to 51%. Hence the need to appeal to the so-called moderates and independents rather than the more "extreme" elements within.
I voted for RP in the primary - today Romney Ryan
FUBO!
anyone claiming to be a libertarian yet knowingly aiding obama needs a beating.
Oh, I remember my teachers indoctrinating us re. how great Jimmy Carter was going to be, I was twelve at the time.
lol. We had a mock election in school that year. I was in sixth grade so I was 12 as well (born in 1969). Anyway, I was all ready to vote for Reagan, but the pretty girl voted for Carter so I changed my vote....didn’t have a clue about either one of them or even what Republican or Democrat was, but I sure as hell knew what a beautiful girl was and if Carter was good for him, he was good for me....stupid youth things.
As I understand the democratic process, my vote is MY vote. Not yours. Not the party’s.
So then, would you agree with the statement: In striving to make the party appeal to everyone, the party can only succeed in appealing to no-one; by standing for nothing it only attracts those who will fall for anything.
I personally know a few people who support Ron Paul. One of my frequent golf buddy voted for him in 2008. This year he voted Green party. Other few I know are fervent libertarians.
This is only anecdotal...but the common thread I observe is they are not very successful financially. Other than they seem to be good people, especially my golfing pal.
I am a Libertarian but in this election, there is no way I would stay at home or vote Libertarian. There is way too much on the line to do that. Obama must be defeated at all costs.
Seriously! This is a tough election that demands tough choices...and you are so right about this board being flagrantly anti-Romney a few months ago.
I'm not blaming anyone for voting whichever way they do, and I pray God I will celebrate Obama's leaving office with all of you tonight.
But the problems that most of us see with a Romney election won't go away. They are MUCH more preferable to the disaster of 4 more years of Obama, but they are still there and they *are still a threat to the existence of this Republic*.
You do not need to appeal to anyone outside your coalition partners ~ the reason is that among politically motivated folks, who can be expected to vote, they are NOT going to switch and vote for the other guy.
Your best source of new voters is among the 90 million adults who don't vote. Your worst source of new voters is among the other major coalition party's members.
The italicized statement you posted would not be a way to win elections because, as it turns out, when you stand for nothing, appeal to no one, and imagine you can win anything, you will be amazed every time you try it! We won't be amazed however.
One thing at a time, let's get Obama out first, then we'll cross that bridge with Romney.
I understand that and I agree with you 100%. Get Obama out first.
Why, yes, conforming to the (R) plantation has not done so well in the past, but, by golly, it’ll work THIS time.
But, just to make the rest of the (R) group happy, let’s cast aside our principles and (still, holding our noses) vote for ABO. At least we get OUR NE liberal guy in office.
Why, on the 1st day, w/ Boehner and McConnell, they’ll repeal all extra-Constitutional laws/Depts and start to follow the Constitution as they’ve swore to do (before).
Why not berate the Libertarians on this board, it’s not like the (R)’s NEED them anyway, right?! So, who cares WHOM they vote for?
Different plantation, but same slave owners. I’ll eat crow when I see a dept. shut down, laws rescinded and/or a budget surplus, but I’m not holding my breath.
I don't recall labeling them that ~ it's pretty obvious what they are ~ as with the Paulbots, Bushbots, Obamabots ~ there are the Mittbots.
These petty battles over nomenclature will be won eventually ~ but I think this one is a pretty good one. It allows us to easily differentiate between True Conservatives and Mittbots, and GOP-e ~ after all the GOP-e aren't even real Republicans ~ and to a degree that is a situation that should be of serious concern to all of us.
At 7 PM EST, all the Mittbots in my book come back to life as MITTBOTS ~ the Obamabots turn into LOSERS.
Anyone got a problem with that?
7 PM EST today ~ the bridge is crossed and the battle re-engaged!
Did you make that statistic up just now, or did you pull it from some warm dark orifice where it has been festering?
If "Conservatives" reject limiting the Federal Government to it's Constitutionally authorized functions, then I guess I ain't one.
I still think Ron Paul would have been the best bet for Americas future. His principles are more in line with our constitution and our founding fathers than any candidate in recent history.......even Reagan.
However, I hold my nose and support Romney; Obamas go to go!!!!
you can’t sit there and cherry pick Libertarian beliefs ~ and say, ‘so there’. you guys have so much incompatible baggage, that one little item just doesn’t get you over the 5 % compatibility level.
Right. Imagine a coalition that would elect Romney....now a different fight like about homosexuality or abortion or slashing the budget. You may have to lose some folks in the original coalition and pick others up.
The DNC worked hard for Virgil and still no joy.
any 3rd party presidnet will have to buy twice as many votes.
Top down will never work.
Romney will need to go along with the greater part of the party on those questions, or he'll suddenly find himself the head of a quite small party.
I think the first efforts have to be to go after the appointees he comes up with. Any of them unwilling to slash their agency's budget should be opposed. That's where you get control of the budget ~ right there in the agencies where the people work who 'do budget' every year.
Given his inclination to always appoint Democrats to the judiciary, we'll need to stop him in the Judiciary committee, which means we need to hop on that problem immediately ~ presuming the Republicans win control of the Senate, the seniormost Republican, Orin Hatch, is going to have to PROVE his Social Conservative inclinations ~ we don't want any of that 'I don't want to push my personal beliefs on the barbarians around me' nonsense. Hatch has to come across regarding Committee Chairmanships or we lose the judiciary to another long period of fascist pig domination!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.