Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yes, Sarah Palin is a RINO.
The Reality Check ^ | 2010-01-23 | Zbigniew Mazurak

Posted on 01/23/2010 10:19:54 AM PST by rabscuttle385

Paul Streitz has decided to call Sarah Palin by her real name, because she endorsed John McCain (who is trying to win a fifth term as Senator) and said she will campaign for him. Fanatic Palinites, such as the editors of the misnamed „conservatives4palin.com” website (they should rename it „liberals4palin.com”), lambasted him and called him a “backstabber”.

“If Paul Streitz’s support of Governor Palin is contingent upon his agreeing with every decision she makes or her selling out her deeply-held values, that’s unfortunate. While all support is appreciated, the governor has never been for sale. Ask the Alaska establishment, who learned that early in her political career.”

Palin has proven that she IS for sale – if one picks her for veep. She’s endorsed a despicable traitor because he chose her as his veep.

Palin is so dishonest (or so ignorant) that she didn’t even tell the truth about why she endorsed John McLame. She claimed that:

“John McCain is on fire to kill Obama’s government takeover of healthcare and that’s what I want to see.”

Which might be incorrect, because McCain favors the SAME policy on socialized medicine as Obama – he just might vote against this particular Act. McCain favors socialized medicine, as proven by Steven Warshawsky:

“McCain’s campaign website [of 2008 – ZM] demonstrates that his thinking on this issue is much closer to Hillary Clinton than Adam Smith. For example, McCain states that “controlling costs” is his top priority, and that “nothing short of a complete reform of the culture of our health system and the way we pay for it will suffice.” This is a recipe for massive government interference in the health care industry. McCain also supports universal coverage, claiming that “we can and must provide access to health care for all our citizens.” Completing the liberal trifecta, at the January 5 ABC NEWS debate, when Romney criticized McCain for “turn[ing] the pharmaceutical companies into the big bad guys,” McCain replied, “Well, they are.” Plainly, if he were president, McCain would serve as the Democrats’ “useful idiot” for their plan to impose socialized medicine on the nation.”

Also, I’ve heard from a friend that McCain will likely now try to save the socialized medicine bill. So on socialized medicine, McCain and Obama differ only about particular bills, NOT about the merits of socialized medicine itself.

What about the task of protecting the American people? No duty is more important than that one. But on that issue, McCain is also liberal and unreliable. Palin falsely claimed that:

“And his commitment and his leadership on national security to win the war on terror, that’s what we need. (…) national security, he gets it. He understands how to win.”

Palin is flat wrong. McCain is NOT committed to the task of defending the American people, and he’s not a leader on anything except liberal policies. He „doesn’t get it”. He doesn’t understand how to win the Global War on Terrorists, nor does he understand any defense issue or foreign policy issue confronting America now. I’ve written several articles pertaining to this guy, demonstrating what McCain’s specific policies are, and why they are wrong. So I’m not going to repeat those entire articles. Let me comment again on McCain’s policy on the GWOT, though, because that’s one specific issue that Palin mentioned.

John McCain does NOT say that America should attack its enemies before they attack America. He also endorsed Obama’s decision to close Guantanamo, and he opposes “enhanced interrogation techniques”, which are absolutely necessary to gain intel information and protect America.

McCain also buys the PC propaganda about the root causes of the Islamic threat. He believes that these root causes are “poverty, tyranny and despair”, and ignores what terrorists themselves say motivates them: the Quran, which contains several explicit commandments to kill nonbelievers.

In short, McCain doesn’t recognize the real nature of the Islamic threat, and he’s not prepared to combat it effectively. Anyone who isn’t prepared to combat it effectively is a person who doesn’t belong in the Senate. If the GWOT is the most important issue for you, McCain is undisputably the worst possible Senatorial candidate from Arizona.

I did not include McCain’s cretinous, liberal, anti-American policies on foreign policy issues other than the GWOT, even though I could (foreign policy is not limited to the GWOT, although Sarah Palin, as an ignorant person, doesn’t understand that). My articles about McCain refute his idiotic policies, so I just wrote a reply to what Palin explicitly said. She did not comment on McCain’s treasonous policies like nuclear disarmament and the progressive abolition of conventional weapon programs (which are necessary to protect America against China).

The failed 2008 VP candidate also said this about McCain:

“And he is a statesman, and I don’t hesitate at all to say, no.”

Which is not true. McCain is not a statesman; anyone who calls him a statesman insults real statesmen. A genuine statesman fights for the right policies, regardless of ideology; works for his country 24/7; and retires when he should.

McCain has spent the last 9 years promoting destructive liberal policies to punish the GOP for its decision to give Bush the 2000 Republican nomination; he’s been working against the US and for his liberal ideology (together with fellow liberals like Kennedy, Obama, Russ Feingold, and Hillary Clinton); and he has refused to retire – he’s vying for his fifth term as Senator. By comparison, George Washington refused to serve as President for a 3rd term, even though as of 1797, there were no presidential term limits. McCain is running to keep his salary, not to serve the American people, whose opinions are irrelevant for him.

Palin ended her statement thus:

“we do need his leadership, especially on those two fronts: Government takeover of healthcare, he wants to kill it; national security, he gets it. He understands how to win.”

See above. Her claims are false.

Whether she uttered those claims because she’s ignorant or because she knows they’re false and decided to lie for McCain, only Palin knows. Regardless of the answer to that question, she’s not qualified for the Presidency, as she has proven with these statements and other utterances. She embarrasses herself everytime she speaks. Conservatives4palin.com editors claim that she is simply behaving like a loyal person. But one’s own country is supreme to any person and any requirement for loyal individuals. When the choice is “Either the country or the person you should loyally endorse”, a real hero, a real patriot, a real statesman/stateswoman chooses the country, not the person. Palin has endorsed a strident liberal who’s trying to enrich himself with taxpayers’ money.

I was a fan of Palin myself. But I’m now convinced that she’s not a conservative, nor is she a politician qualied for the Presidency of the United States. She’s simply just another RINO endorsing another RINO. No real conservative would ever endorse McCain for the Senate.


TOPICS: Humor; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: 0bot; 100moron; 1idiotposter; alaska; americalovesarah; assclown; clown; clownpost; democrat; democratpropaganda; desperatelyneedszot; dishonest; dncposer; drillbabydrill; election2016; fraud; givemeliberty; idiotposse; idiotpost; ilovesarah; irrelevanceposse; liar; mcamnesty; mcbama; mccain; mccain4obama; mccain4rinos; mccainantihayworth; mccainantiteaparty; mccainmutiny; mccainpalin; mcdemocrat; mcidiot; mcinsane; mckennedy; mclamesrevenge; mclamesrinoparty; mcliberal; mcloser; mcnasty; mcnuts; mcpain; mcposter; mcqueeg; mcrino; mctroll; moveon; obamalover; org; palin; palin4amnesty; palin4graham; palin4illegals; palin4mccain; palin4mexico; palin4murkowski; palin4rinos; palin4rnc; palin4steele; palinjudasgoat; palinrocks; palintruthfile; paulbot; paulestinians; paulistapuritypatrol; proamnesty; rino; romney; romneyantipalin; romneybotsattack; romneybotshere; runsarahrun; sarahistheanti0; sarahpalin; senoritasarah; squattersupportsquad; troll; trollboy; zotthsimoron
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-510 next last

Oh my.

1 posted on 01/23/2010 10:19:54 AM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

*Yawn*


2 posted on 01/23/2010 10:21:03 AM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmarie373; Abundy; missanne; Victoria Delsoul; 50mm; stockpirate; Eaker; ducdriver; ChrisInAR; ...

3 posted on 01/23/2010 10:21:22 AM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

This should be a good one. BRB with some popcorn


4 posted on 01/23/2010 10:21:47 AM PST by GQuagmire ( We are no longer Massholes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire
This should be a good one. BRB with some popcorn

:-P

5 posted on 01/23/2010 10:22:17 AM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Just another venue for the Get Palin mob to exploit.


6 posted on 01/23/2010 10:22:51 AM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

Watching purists heads explode


7 posted on 01/23/2010 10:23:24 AM PST by chargers fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Sarah is still Sarah...she is conservative and very independent in her thinking...I thought that’s why we loved her?

Look for her and everyone else to ride this indipendent wave.

It’s in Vogue.


8 posted on 01/23/2010 10:24:03 AM PST by Texas4ever (God is in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

funny, no one minded at all when she campaigned for him last summer.....HHHHmmmm, there they go again, if you don’t agree with me 100% of the time you are a rino, gets old


9 posted on 01/23/2010 10:24:28 AM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Aw Jeez.


10 posted on 01/23/2010 10:25:13 AM PST by McGruff (Love ya Sarah but I will support and contribute to JD Hayworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

LOL.

You are a 1.7%.

Honestly, how old are you, I’v been told mid teens.


11 posted on 01/23/2010 10:25:47 AM PST by rbmillerjr (It's us against them...the Establishment RINOs vs rank and file...Sarah Palin or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I’m willing to suggest that she is being a bit clever, as well as loyal.

McCain will have to behave himself for nine months or Palin could pull the endorsement. We also don’t know what might have been said behind the scenes. The McCain statements about health care in the article can be taken a bunch of different ways. Most likely, he was trying to leave himself maximum wiggle room in all directions. With Palin on board, he has to be careful how he wiggles.


12 posted on 01/23/2010 10:25:50 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Politicians are after all politicians.

I think McCaine should hang it up, but if he wins he wins

At some level it is all a big game


13 posted on 01/23/2010 10:26:08 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Ridiculous. Sarah Palin is being a smart politician. It does not help for her to isolate herself from other prominant conservatives and Republicans — yes, including Juan McLame — by attacking or failing to support the deeply flawed and morally challenged senator from Arizona. Her campaign support for him will emphasize his conservative positions. She will downplay his many flawed positions. Now is not the time to cannibalize the Republican party. The party will be rebuilt and regain its strength (and possibly majority status) primarily with new blood challenging liberals. If Palin campaigns against McLame, it may fracture the Republican party beyond repair.


14 posted on 01/23/2010 10:26:13 AM PST by PackerBoy (Just my opinion ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
‘President’ Sarah Palin is a Good American. People who purport to be conservatives need to get off her skirt.
15 posted on 01/23/2010 10:26:30 AM PST by Realman30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

So speaketh the cult of Ron Paul, the biggest RINO in existence.


16 posted on 01/23/2010 10:26:49 AM PST by DakotaRed (What happened to the country I fought for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PackerBoy
If Palin campaigns against McLame, it may fracture the Republican party beyond repair.

McCain has already splintered the GOP!

17 posted on 01/23/2010 10:28:19 AM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Palin has proven that she IS for sale – if one picks her for veep. She’s endorsed a despicable traitor because he chose her as his veep

For sale? Palin is not getting anything out of it so this doesn't prove she is for sale. The man is confusing sales with loyalty. I disagree with Palin for supporting McCain but it is obvious she did it out of loyalty and not to get anything for herself.

18 posted on 01/23/2010 10:28:22 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
I would like to propose the disuse of the term "RINO". Why? Because there is no such thing. That which we Conservatives think of as the Ideal Republican, simply does not exist, it cannot. A "Republican" is a dominantly political animal, willing to compromise its values in order to seek political gain. That applies to ALL REPUBLICANS (and Democrats BTW). The term RINO is somewhat redundant, like "underwater fish".

If you show me a republican who is NO a RINO, then I submit that the person is simply a Conservative posing as a Republican.

19 posted on 01/23/2010 10:28:45 AM PST by Paradox (ObamaCare = Logan's Run ; There is no Sanctuary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091
You were saying ...

funny, no one minded at all when she campaigned for him last summer.....HHHHmmmm, there they go again, if you don’t agree with me 100% of the time you are a rino, gets old

Yeah! And it's super-typical with a group of FReepers, too... LOL...

And if you don't agree with them, you're an idiot, a troll, an Obot, or a liberal and so on... :-)

It's so typical that you know what's coming before you see the post... doncha know.

[Truth in advertising here: I voted for McCain and Palin and would vote for them again, right now, if it came up to an Obama-type again... :-)]








Sarah Palin, Miss Wasilla, 1984


20 posted on 01/23/2010 10:29:06 AM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 501-510 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson