Posted on 03/06/2023 6:47:08 AM PST by RoosterRedux
After decades of it being a taboo topic, Congress is finally waking up to UFOs, and the Department of Defense is reviewing historical documents related to "unidentified aerial phenomena" dating back to 1945.
*snip*
"All the programs that they've run, all the data that they've amassed, the conclusions that they've drawn, and any materials that they may have recovered.
*snip*
"They also want answers on allegations that UFOs have in some way interacted with nuclear weapons.
"A key thing in the Defense Bill is a sort of whistleblower protection.
"So, in parallel with this going back and reporting on what they've done and what they've concluded is a provision that says anyone who's been involved in any of these programs can come forward, testify to Congress, testify to the Pentagon's new AARO Unit, which is the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office.
"And even if they are covered or believe they are covered still by a secrecy oath or a non-disclosure agreement, they are authorized under the Defense Bill to come forward and give their testimony. So, this is huge and this is something to watch.
"I understand from people who have had some involvement in some of these programs, that people are already coming forward, some testimony has been given.
"I hope we are going to see some of that made public. But even if not, this is progress, after years of this subject being regarded as fringe and the stigma attached to it ... that's falling away as we speak.
"I think people are approaching this with very mixed emotions. Some people, I think, feel angry this has been suppressed for so long that it's been ridiculed, sometimes seemingly with government complicity.
"Some people are like: 'I want to get this off my chest' and are eagerly coming forward...
(Excerpt) Read more at the-sun.com ...
Shiny thing. Look over there.
“Whistleblowers” I think Edward Snowden he has to live in Russia.
These “Whistleblowers” still get to live in the USA two different classes a little astroturf here.
The USAF has been the greatest enemy of transparency, threatening even civilians with ruin if they spoke of their experiences (whether sightings or abductions).
This doesn't mean that the USAFOSI won't still try to shut people up behind the scenes, but it is a start.
At least so far, the flood gates are opening.
OK now what? (crickets)
Exactly - look in opposite direction to find out what is being released that they don’t want people to notice...
We haven’t (or can’t) done anything about it
IF true they are way beyond are technology
It's the kind of comment only made by people who don't stay abreast of the news.
BTW, up till now, any mention of this shiny thing by civilians got them labeled as quacks. Hardly a shiny thing, eh?
And any mention by people in the military got them sent to the base psychiatrist and threatened with a medical discharge.
How's that shiny thing concept applicable there?
A "shiny thing" is supposed to be a distraction...not a ticket to the nut house.
Not saying he's telling the truth or fabricating tales. He's an enigma.
Then of course there is us....;)
Old news
That said, I know people who have seen things up close and personal.
Now, who knows what the hell they saw, but...? Perhaps it was some kind of mass hypnosis or a mushroom that got slipped into their dinner.
The internet connects people and when they learn that other people have had similar experiences, they are empowered. So people who are in the thick of this moving story are saying that there has been a shift in momentum.
The military is pissed because Congress pulled a fast one (with this new indemnity). They are naturally worried that the story (whatever it is) is slipping out of their control.
I don't know what this is. I am just always captivated by a mystery. But as a lot of former military people going public with their experiences say, "whatever it is, it is something quite real." Entire ships have seen "things" and the things seen were concurrently picked up by multiple sensors.
As for me, I'll wait for more evidence, even if it is only anecdotal.
What do you make of that?
Who knows?
I tend to believe him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.