The Minnesota River near Shakopee, Minn.Courtesy Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Posted on 05/20/2022 8:52:35 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
Renville County authorities said they got quite a surprise after asking the FBI to help identify a partial skull found along the Minnesota River last summer.
The bone turned up as the water receded during last summer's drought, and was spotted by passing kayakers. Renville County Sheriff Scott Hable said his agency got the bone and turned it over to a medical examiner, and eventually to the FBI, wondering if it could be linked to a recent missing person case.
Instead, Hable said, they found something else...
He said the FBI report included that the man likely ate a marine diet including maize and sorghum, and that his skull had a “defect” that was “perhaps suggestive of the cause of death.”
The county's Facebook post on the discovery drew criticism from Native Minnesotans, who said their ancestral remains shouldn't be shared online.
“We had no idea but we were alerted to the fact that that Facebook post was offensive to one or more people and so we have since taken that post down. We didn’t mean for it to be offensive whatsoever,” Hable said...
In a statement, Minnesota Indian Affairs Council Cultural Resources Specialist Dylan Goetsch said neither the council nor the state archaeologist were made aware of the discovery as required by state law.
(Excerpt) Read more at mprnews.org ...
The Minnesota River near Shakopee, Minn.Courtesy Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Thanks ButThreeLeftsDo.
What’s the proof their ancestors were there 8000 years ago?
Saw a video of shark tooth hunters in a creek in SC who found a skull and called the cops. The forensics woman who examined it on scene determined it was of colonial age within minutes of studying it.
Of course they were there, who do you think killed the guy?
But it’s OK to post pictures of Asian, Caucasian, and Negroid skulls, right? This is how ridiculous this “woke” crap has become. How does posting a picture of someone’s skull, with no facial features, qualify as offensive? It is historical. They are just looking for some kind of payoff.
The county’s Facebook post on the discovery drew criticism from Native Minnesotans, who said their ancestral remains shouldn’t be shared online.
***keep complaining and pretty soon it’ll be like you never existed...***
After the FBI did a DNA test on the skull they came up with a sketch of what the person most likely looked like.
That has to set a new “cold case” record!
LOL
That’s a real cold case!
What’s the proof their ancestors were there 8000 years ago?
—
If the tribes had their way, none - just take their word. They never lie or have any political agendas, you know.
Is it Biden’s skull?
The tribal agenda here is not woke, but maintaining the legal fiction that they were created here. This entitles them to all sorts of legalized special privileges unavailable to other non-tribals, including the much outraged inner city blacks.
All of this helps the ruling tribal families to maintain the life styles they have become accustom to with such privilege - regular tribal types may live in squalor but not the ruling families.
He voted for Biden in 2020 though.
Nope, it wasn’t found stuck up the pelvis.
“The county’s Facebook post on the discovery drew criticism from Native Minnesotans, who said their ancestral remains shouldn’t be shared online.”
Really? I’ll bet if someone farts near some of these folks they would be so triggered they would die.
Sounds like a plan. :^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
