Posted on 02/10/2015 7:57:09 AM PST by Reverend Saltine
The Success of Irans Taqiyya Tactics
KhameneiIn his eagerness to conclude a deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran over its nuclear program, U.S. President Barack Obama has knowingly or not, overlooked what is known to Muslims as taqiyya. According to the Middle East Forum The Quran allows Muslims to have a declared agenda, and a secret agenda (Jihad, slaughter, and mayhem) during time of weakness, this is called Taqiyya. To put it in simpler words, it is the art of deception, or more correctly, of deceiving non-Muslim infidels.
While negotiations with the P5+1 are ongoing, last Monday (February 2, 2015) Irans military launched a satellite into space called Safir-e Fajr. According to the Iranian Arabic-language Al-Alam TV, the Fajr satellite was successfully placed 450 kilometers above earth. Irans moderate President Rouhani proudly noted Our scientists have entered a new phase for conquering space. We will continue on this path. The Iranian Defense Minister General Hossein Dehgan added that the 21-meter, 26 ton launcher named SafirFajr shows the ability of Iran to build satellite launchers.
This new development should elevate the Obama administrations concerns, if not cause full-fledged alarm over the Islamic Republic development of satellite technology that could have military purposes, including the continued development of long-range ballistic missiles, capable of carrying nuclear warheads that could reach American soil. But in typical taqiyya form, Iran has denied having a military role for its space program and its nuclear program.
The Obama administration, instead, is concerned about the upcoming address of Israels Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the U.S. Congress and the American people. Netanyahu, the White House fears, might reveal Irans deception, which might compel the administration to re-think the current P5+1 negotiation with Iran, and perhaps justify the Mark Kirk (R-IL)-Robert Menendez (D-NJ) bill to impose sanctions on Iran. President Obama maintains now that he refuses to set artificial deadlines to the negotiations with Iran, but he also conceded in a press conference that we are not going to have talks forever. The New York Times reported (May 19, 2009) that Obama told Netanyahu during his White House visit, Were not going to create a situation in which talks become an excuse for inaction while Iran proceeds with developing a nuclear and deploying a nuclear weapon.
After two deadlines following the interim agreement have expired, and a third will expire this summer, President Obamas words sound rather hollow. In his threat to veto the Kirk-Menendez bill, he sounds more like Irans defense attorney than being committed to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb. All the while, Iran is proceeding with spinning centrifuges.
According to the Times of Israel (January 31, 2015) which quoted Israel TV Channel 10, the deal taking shape between Washington and Tehran would allow Iran to continue enriching uranium in over 7000 centrifuges. It quoted an unnamed Jerusalem source saying The terms of the deal would leave Iran closer than was thought to nuclear weapons, mere months from producing enough material for a bomb. The same article suggested that the U.S. has agreed to 80% of Irans demands.
The existential threat to Israel from a nuclear Iran has prompted PM Netanyahu to accept Speaker John Boehners invitation to address U.S. Congress in early March. Netanyahu feels that he has no choice but to speak out against the imminent deal with Iran. Sources close to Netanyahu suggest that Netanyahus address will praise Obamas efforts rather than criticize him, and it will not be a partisan speech, or focus too much on the proposed sanctions by the U.S. Congress. It would simply address the dangers of the deal currently concocted between the P5+1 and Iran. In his address to the U.S. Congress, Netanyahu should chronicle Irans deception and taqiyya tactics in its efforts to acquire nuclear weapons.
The Canadian Centre for Treaty Compliance has chronicled Irans deception on its nuclear program. In 2002, the dissident group, National Council of Resistance in Iran (NCRI) announced the location of two nuclear sites in Iran; a nuclear fuel production facility in Natanz, and heavy water facility in Arak. On September 12, 2003, the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Board of Governors Resolution called on Iran to ensure no further failures to report, and demanded not to introduce nuclear material into its pilot enrichment cascade in Natanz.
September 24, 2005, Resolution: GOV/2005/87 finds that Irans many failures and breaches of its obligation to comply with NPT Safeguards Agreement , as detailed in GOV/2003/75, constitute non-compliance in the context of Article XII.C of the Agencys (IAEA) Stature; finds also that the history of concealment of Irans nuclear activities has given rise to
On January 10, 2006, Iran broke the IAEA seal at Natanz. John Bolton, U.S. ambassador to the UN reported that the Iranians reverted to form by breaking IAEA seal at the Natanz enrichment facility and resuming research work. In its September, 2008 report, the IAEA said that the document describes experimentation in connection with symmetrical initiation of a hemispherical high explosive charge suitable for an implosion type nuclear device.
The New York Times reported (November 16, 2009) that the International inspectors who gained access to Irans newly revealed underground nuclear enrichment plant voiced strong suspicions in a report that Iran was concealing other atomic facilities. Iran however, will not allow inspectors access to military sites, nor will it allow inspectors to interview key nuclear scientists.
On February 19, 2010, the Washington Post revealed that U.N. nuclear inspectors, citing evidence of an apparent ongoing effort by Iran to obtain new technologies, publicly suggested for the first time that Iran is actively seeking to develop a weapons capability. On August 30, 2012, the IAEA released a report showing a major expansion of Iranian enrichment activities. The report said that Iran has more than doubled the number of centrifuges at the underground facility at Fordow, from 1,064 centrifuges in May to 2,140 centrifuges in August.
The Chicago Tribune (November 7, 2014) quoted nuclear expert David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security as saying it will be difficult if not impossible for Western inspectors to accomplish these goals without knowing exactly how far Irans scientists have advanced in nuclear weapons research. Albright added, If Iran gets a deal without disclosing the past military dimensions of its program, it would continue to be able to say that there was never any military nuclear program, and it was justified in denying inspectors to military sites. That creates a dangerous precedent: The Iranians could leverage that agreement to bar inspectors from suspected nuclear sites in Iran, simply calling them military sites.
On November 25, 2009, President Obama seemed to have had much less trust in Irans aims regarding its nuclear program. At a news conference at the conclusion of a G-20 Pittsburgh, PA summit he stated, Irans action raised doubts about its promise to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes only. This was said in the context of Irans clandestinely building an underground plant (near Qom) to make nuclear fuel that could be used to build a nuclear bomb. Asked about the use of military force against Iran, Obama said, I have always said that we do not rule out any option when it comes to U.S. security interests.
The Iranians have now figured out that the Obama administrations eagerness to strike a deal with them overrides most other considerations. Their taqiyya tactics of deceiving the IAEA and the P5+1, including the U.S. notwithstanding, Tehrans arrogant defiance in insisting that it will continue to build up its nuclear program, as well as its space launchers, makes it clear that the Obama administration might ultimately accept a nuclear Iran.
It is going to come down to the individual decision. At some point, you either have to start shooting, or you die.
.
- - Let’s recall that “Temporary Resident” Barack Hussein Obama Junior was phoning his crazy Muslim “community organizer” cousin in Kenya when he and his Muzzie followers forced Kenyan Christians into a church and set it on fire - just as Muslims set the Jordanian Pilot on fire. At the time US Senator “Stinky” Obama was calling from the US Senate.
- Hmmmmmmmmmmm. . .
.
The rub is you have more than the jihadists to fight. There are any number of federal LE agencies that will kill you for what you propose.
-
- “Burn Baby Burn” Barack Hussein Obama Junior
- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3256052/posts?page=3#3
Knowingly.
The O admin know the Iranians are lying, but the media does not, so it is win-win situation.
$700 million a month.
.
- well done -
“”To put it in simpler words, it is the art of deception, or more correctly, of deceiving non-Muslim infidels.””
That’s OK, obozo took the same course and does it splendidly. Look at the number of voters he deceived in 2008 and 2012....
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.