Posted on 08/11/2012 4:42:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
Except for his unfortunate go along to get along support of TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending and the increased credit limit, etc, Ryan is a pretty good choice. Probably the best choice of the RINOS that were on Romney's short list. I support Ryan for the vice presidency. Wish he were at the top of the ticket, though.
But I still cannot and will not support the grand father of ObamaCare. Romney still loves and brags about his bastard brainchild, RomneyCare, even today when he knows what an anti-liberty socialist POS it is.
And the fact that he advocated that abortion should be safe and legal in America for over three decades of his adult lifetime and even advocated that Roe v Wade should be supported and sustained as settled law precludes any consideration whatsoever by this pro-life Christian for Myth Romney for the presidency.
And the fact that he boasted that he would be better for "gay rights" than Ted Kennedy, and proved it just increases my resistance.
That, and his penchant for gun control, his continuing support for global warming, gays in the scouts, gays in the military, and his record of appointing liberal judges makes it all but impossible for me to support him.
Lastly, we're having a bit of changeover on our moderator staff. At least two moderators resigned this afternoon after I flatly refused to rein in a so-called anti-Mormon "bigot" on FR. Well, if being in opposition to false prophets and false prophecy makes a Christian believer a bigot, then I guess I'm a bigot. I've posted before that I flat do not believe that the Book of Mormon is the true word of God. Nor do I believe that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God. The Christian bible warns us to be weary of false prophets and that I am. Romney being the presumptive Republican nominee does not change that fact.
Damn troll
I’m getting really confused.
Why?
Click HERE and find:
Note it DON'T say "FALSE GODs"
Again, for the benefit of all the slow kids in the audience:
Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
As far as being Jeff’s apologist, if you wanted your comment to be private discussed, and your criticism in secret, then you should have sent it to him via private message. Posting such a comment in a public forum allows all to read, join in with you, or criticize you."
YOU have a bachelor's in ENGLISH??????????
What IS it about REBUKE that galls you so?
What IS it about pointing out FALSE TEACHING that riles your temper?
Body temperature?
In the first place, I never called you a Mittbot. You’re welcome to try to find where I did, but you won’t. You did, however, both initiate our dialogue and call me insane. You’re projecting. So let THAT ‘sink in’.
Meanwhile, you respond to my question about support for your candidate with a typical ABO answer, that you do not support him.
This means you also fall into the typical ABO double-standard. You claim my vote for a third-party candidate is what it isn’t — that is to say a vote for Obama — while you claim your vote for Romney isn’t what it is. How convenient for you.
I understand there are conservatives who are making decisions different from my own and respect intellectual honesty in their so doing. You have now demonstrated that honesty so I applaud you for doing so.
I cannot fathom another election night with Obama being declared the victor. You are so correct, we would be headed straight to the ground if Obama is reelected. Compared to Obama, right now ole Bill Clinton is looking pretty damn good to me. And I never thought in a million years that I would ever think that much less post it! Take care.
Uh; Jeff. Could explain to us just WHICH god you are talking about?
Thanks.
I think you spelled Mouthy MORMONs wrong.
Well, welcome to the current, past (four years ago) and future direction of the GOP —a nominee from the “moderate” fiscal and foreign policy wing of the socilaist/pervert party at the top of the ticket and an occaisonal conservative running mate to suck patriots into squandering their votes once again...
I’m done playing the game.
So done with voting AGAINST somebody.
Absolutely finished with voting for the “lesser” of two evils (debatable in this case).
I’m writing in Chuck Norris; hell, I’d write in a vote for my 3-legged dog before I’d spend a vote that good men have died for on either of these fag-pandering, baby murdering, elitist candy dates.
God Bless you for sticking with your principles, Jim.
How is that for juvenile name calling!
This place used to attract a better class of people!
(I'll vote for Virgil Goode of the Constitution Party)
You...on the other hand...sound like in 2012...
you'll vote for a pro-abort for POTUS
one with a liberal track record of appointing 75% Democratic judges
one who supports global warming nonsense
a socialist healthcare pioneer
a big govt statist
who favors letting states dictate that employees deemed a "sexual preference" orientation can be considered "minority class status"...hence every workplace in those states will have to "prove" they are not "discriminating" vs. transgenders, homosexuals, "bi" & every other "alternative" sexuality under the sun by hiring a given declared "%" ... a new "sexual preference" quota system in place...
On so many issues, Romney & Obama are "twins" ... like this one:
Obama, Romney opposed to Boy Scouts ban on gays (USA Today, Aug. 8, 2012)
One thing that seems odd, the appellation ABO used as a pejorative about others. Particularly on a conservative web site where everyone should be anti-O.
I sure do. And when it becomes a requirement to always post grammatically correct and typo-free errors 100% of the time on forum websites, get back to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.