Heard this is already running.
1 posted on
12/06/2011 9:33:12 AM PST by
montag813
To: montag813
BRUTAL.The truth about Newt is brutal. I thought Mittens would be my very last choice in Republican candidates until I saw Newt in the running. Perry, Bachmann, Paul would all be vastly better than either Newt or Mittens.
2 posted on
12/06/2011 9:36:07 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(your own government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: montag813
To: montag813
Does anyone know what Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment was? Just more evidence that there is no one of Reagan's ability or stature in this primary field.
4 posted on
12/06/2011 9:41:47 AM PST by
detective
To: montag813
I didn't start out as a New supporter but I am coming around a bit. Paul attacking Newt or other Republicans is a stupid way to go about becoming the nominee and it's why Gingrich is doing well. He is focusing on attacking Obama’s policies and what he has done to this country. Paul will not be garnering the nomination and we all know that. Plus the fact that Paul's foreign policy scares the hell out of me. Plus he seems to have a grudge of sorts for Israel. I will never understand candidates who stay in the race after it becomes clear they are not going to win the nomination. To take peoples money perhaps. Flame away.
6 posted on
12/06/2011 9:42:51 AM PST by
mk2000
To: montag813
Paul doesn’t like the Republicans Hes running against, well Paul is not a Republican, Democrats don’t like the Republicans either, but they don’t run in Republican primarys
7 posted on
12/06/2011 9:43:13 AM PST by
reefdiver
("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
To: montag813
Oklahoma Straw Poll puts Mrs. Paul in first place with Cain in close second. The Paulettes have become quite organized here, unfortunately.
8 posted on
12/06/2011 9:43:49 AM PST by
RasterMaster
("To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: montag813
The entire Obama machine is very pleased with Ron Paul. What a major league ***hole. He has no chance to win, only destroy.
10 posted on
12/06/2011 9:46:18 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
To: montag813; All
Facts are facts, the public voters need to know reality not hype.
Newt is not the guy to lead America. He is not a conservative. No matter what he says look at the record of his time in Congress. At one time he did show some conservatism to become speaker of the house. His character is not good. He is a futurist, an internationalist, and would gladly let the UN declare the laws for all.
God help us in America hold on to our freedoms, under God.. in Jesus name.
11 posted on
12/06/2011 9:48:49 AM PST by
Countyline
(God loves you ... He wants you to love Him back; to learn of Him and obey His commands.)
To: montag813; All
Don’t know what others are hearing, but I am hearing a lot of people are really ticked off at Paul for this. Obviously Newt fans are, but the outrage is not limited to Newt fans. Bet if Paul gets the nomination, there will be a third part run. Paul is way to scary for MOST of America.
13 posted on
12/06/2011 9:50:26 AM PST by
LuvFreeRepublic
(Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
To: montag813
Ron Paul = Ross Perot and four more years of Obama.
18 posted on
12/06/2011 9:53:21 AM PST by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: montag813
23 posted on
12/06/2011 9:55:50 AM PST by
PMAS
To: montag813
Ron Paul is a first class nut case.
To: montag813
If you can't convince voters to vote for you based on your own merits, because you are a raving lunatic, then you have to try to destroy your opponent with disingenuous advertising and claims. Ron Paul is such a class act.
Interesting that Ron Paul is running the same sort of campaign that Obama is going to run--since he can't run on his record either.
So much for Reagan's 11th commandment--oh yeah, Paul abandoned Reagan and the Republican Party back in the 80's.
I see the ad fails to mention the fact that Ron Paul is one of the highest, if not the highest recipient of pork-barrel money and requester of earmarks in Congress all the while railing against them and claiming that "he doesn't vote for them."
There's hypocrisy and then there's hypocrisy.
25 posted on
12/06/2011 9:58:52 AM PST by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
To: montag813
Your old buddy RUN-Paul is making a huge mistake by wasting campaign funds to take out who he sees as a threat to his pathetic Populist/Liberalterian dream.
This won't do him a bit of good and it will help Newt before it will hurt him. It will only manage to illustrate how hateful the Paul camp truly is. Instead of going after Romney and Obama, they take this route. What ever dudes, just go smoke another doob and it will all be good.
26 posted on
12/06/2011 10:01:43 AM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
To: montag813
Even a broken cl//koc/ok is right twice a day.
37 posted on
12/06/2011 10:13:03 AM PST by
JohnBovenmyer
(Obama been Liberal. Hope Change!)
To: montag813
Funny how the public has a big problem with a former politician working as a paid lobbyist for $1million while Jamie Gorelick got paid $26million on the inside because she was such a banking genius after being such a national security genius and then went on to be a legal advisor genius "helping" negotiate damages between BP and the gubmint.
Nobody blinks about the damage that woman has done.
38 posted on
12/06/2011 10:14:19 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Since Obama's only challengers in 2012 are in the GOP debates, including him the next 15.)
To: montag813
Now we all know what kind of DC hack the Grinch really is.
We also know how he earned the money to pay for all the diamonds.
To: montag813
Ron Paul is now censoring his youtube video of negative comments.
All I did is point out his hypocrisy in two comments.
"Ron Paul left the Republican Party back in the 80's when he turned his back on Ronald Reagan. Why is he now running on the Republican ticket?
There's hypocrisy and then there's HYPOCRISY."
"In 2009 Ron Paul requested $424,564,942.00 in pork barrel spending and earmarks--all the while ranting against earmarks and "not voting for earmarks."
There's hypocrisy and then there's HYPOCRISY.
Now both comments have been removed and I have been blocked from his youtube page.
It is clear, Ron Paul doesn't want the truth to be told. He is dishonest and a hypocrite worse than anything of which he accuses Newt Gingrich.
LOL!!! Now that's a story worth telling.
51 posted on
12/06/2011 2:25:18 PM PST by
Sudetenland
(Anybody but Obama!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson