That was not my question. As for Catholics, I think there are Catholic Christians, but the system of doctrine is definitely not "rightly dividing the Word of Truth". I would say the same about Arminians. As one author put it, Arminians are saved, and that by a "felicitous inconsistency". The Arminian doctrines themselves, when taken to their conclusions, are not biblical, IMHO. That doesn't mean that an Arminian can't be saved, any more than it means that a Catholic can't be saved. People aren't saved by doctrine, they are saved by the True Christ, Jesus.
I did not say whether I entirely agreed with the article or not. I posted it for discussion. It amazes me how quickly people read into things what they want to see, and then go off half-cocked, and say things the article never said. Webber was a good example of that.
Would you not agree, though, that a person who worships a false Christ cannot be a Christian? The operative word here is "false"...
Yes, I would agree. I believe there are essentials between Calvinists, Arminians and Catholics and that many in each tradition follow the true Christ.
I would not, however, distinguish between a "Calvinist Christ" and "Arminian Christ" or a "Catholic Christ."
Who Christ is is not determined by what we call Him. Or even what we think about Him.