Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Christ of Arminianism
A Puritan's Mind ^ | unknown | Rev. Steven Houck

Posted on 09/07/2003 6:36:06 PM PDT by nobdysfool

The Christ of Arminianism

The Bible warns us that in the last days in which we live there will be many false Christs-those who claim to be Christ but who are imposters. Jesus said, "Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in my name, saying I am Christ; and shall deceive many." (Matt. 24:4-5). We who profess to be Christians must take heed. We must be very careful that we are not deceived. Our calling is to trust, love, and follow the true Christ and Him only. We may have nothing to do with the false Christs who are so numerous in our day.

We know about the Christ of the cults and other religions. He is a good man, a prophet, the first creation of God, a great spirit, a divine idea, or even a god himself. But he is not true and eternal God. He receives his existence from another who is greater than he. He is not the Christ of the Bible. We are not deceived by this Christ. He is a false Christ.

We know about the Christ of Roman Catholicism. They profess that He is true God. He suffered and died for the forgiveness of sin. He arose again, ascended into heaven, and is coming again. But he is not a complete Savior. The Christ of the Roman Catholics can not save sinners without their own good works and the intercession of priests. He is not the Christ of the Bible. We are not deceived by this Christ. He is a false Christ.

There is, however, another false Christ who is much more dangerous than the Christ of the cults and the Christ of Roman Catholicism. He has deceived people for many years and he continues to deceive millions. This Christ is so dangerous that, if it were not impossible, he would deceive the very elect (Matt. 24:24). He is the Christ of Arminianism.

This false Christ is extremely dangerous because in many ways he appears to be the True Christ. They say that he is true God, equal with the Father and the Holy Spirit. They say that he died on the cross to save sinners. They even say that he saves by his grace alone, without the work of man. This Christ will have nothing to do with the Christ of the cults and the Christ of Roman Catholicism.

But watch out! Be warned! The Christ of Arminianism is not the Christ of the Bible. Do not be fooled!

1. The Christ of Arminianism - loves every individual person in the world and sincerely desires their salvation.

The Christ of the Bible - earnestly loves and desires the salvation of only those whom God has unconditionally chosen to salvation. (Ps. 5:5, Ps. 7:11, Ps. 11:5, Matt. 11:27, John 17:9-10, Acts 2:47, Acts 13:48, Rom. 9:10-13, Rom. 9:21-24, Eph. 1:3-4)

2. The Christ of Arminianism - offers salvation to every sinner and does all in his power to bring them to salvation. His offer and work are often frustrated, for many refuse to come.

The Christ of the Bible - effectually calls to Himself only the elect and sovereignly brings them to salvation. Not one of them will be lost. (Isa. 55:11, John 5:21, John 6:37-40, John 10:25-30, John 17:2, Phil. 2:13)

3. The Christ of Arminianism - can not regenerate and save a sinner who does not first choose Christ with his own "free will." All men have a "free will" by which they can either accept or reject Christ. That "free will" may not be violated by Christ.

The Christ of the Bible - sovereignly regenerates the elect sinner apart from his choice, for without regeneration the spiritually dead sinner can not choose Christ. Faith is not man's contribution to salvation but the gift of Christ which He sovereignly imparts in regeneration. (John 3:3, John 6:44 & 65, John 15:16, Acts 11:18, Rom. 9:16, Eph. 2:1,Eph. 2:8-10, Phil. 1:29, Hebr. 12:2)

4. The Christ of Arminianism - died on the cross for every individual person and thereby made it possible for every person to be saved. His death, apart from the choice of man, was not able to actually save anyone for many for whom he died are lost.

The Christ of the Bible - died for only God's elect people and thereby actually obtained salvation for all those for whom He died. His death was a substitutionary satisfaction which actually took away the guilt of His chosen people. (Luke 19:10, John 10:14-15 & 26, Acts 20:28, Rom. 5:10, Eph. 5:25, Hebr. 9:12, I Peter 3:18)

5. The Christ of Arminianism - loses many whom he has "saved" because they do not continue in faith. Even if he does give them "eternal security," as some say, that security is not based upon his will or work but the choice which the sinner made when he accepted Christ.

The Christ of the Bible - preserves His chosen people so that they can not lose their salvation but persevere in the faith to the very end. He preserves them by the sovereign electing will of God, the power of His death, and the mighty working of His Spirit. (John 5:24, John 10:26-29, Rom. 8:29-30, Rom. 8:35-39, I Peter 1:2-5, Jude 24-25)

As you can see, although the Christ of Arminianism and the Christ of the Bible may at first seem to be the same, they are very different. One is a false Christ. The other is the true Christ. One is weak and helpless. He bows before the sovereign "free will" of man. The other is the reigning Lord Who wills what He pleases and sovereignly accomplishes all that He wills.

If you believe and serve the Christ of Arminianism, you must recognize the fact that you do not serve the Christ of the Bible. You have been deceived! Study the Scriptures and learn of the True Christ. Pray for grace to repent and trust Christ as your sovereign


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 781-787 next last
To: lockeliberty
Thank you.
661 posted on 09/10/2003 10:08:22 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (9/11 Tribute www.wardsmythe.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: exduck; drstevej; RnMomof7; CCWoody; OrthodoxPresbyterian; Gamecock; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; ...
Your interesting use of statistics is astounding (outside of McAuliffe's office that is). If South Africa is a Calvinist country, then I guess you consider Anglicans Calvinist somehow and the Muslims and Jews are Calvinist and even the native animist (spelled P-A-G-A-N) tribes are Calvinist too using your rather bizarre mathematical logic. As DrSteveJ said: Heaven is 100% Calvinist.
662 posted on 09/10/2003 10:13:05 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: exduck; rdb3; Jean Chauvin; Wrigley
Of Course the British were innocent in the birth of Apartheid, since they were the ones running the country till the late 40's. I guess that was left out of your "research" and rather pathetic attempts to paint the Dutch as bigots. In fact, you would preclude our African and African American brothers and sisters in the gospel from existing by your blatant attempt to paint Calvinists as "racist."

Was Apartheid disgusting? Duh, yes it was. So was lynching in the US and the rather nasty Liberal invention known as Welfare which essentially consigned generations of poor folks (all colors here) to grinding poverty and nasty condescending social workers keeping them poor. And that brings me to a question: exDuck, what have you done to actually materially assist the poor in your city? have you worked at a learning center to help kids reading 2 or more grade levels below their age group to learn? Fed the poor? even given clothes and household goods you have too much of to the homeless? I would love to see the answers. Until then, I will assume you are a typical idiot mush headed liberal bigot too scared to take on the title.

663 posted on 09/10/2003 10:20:46 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

Comment #664 Removed by Moderator

Comment #665 Removed by Moderator

To: exduck; drstevej; RnMomof7; snerkel
Nope. Kindly answer the question below. If that is not too difficult for you to do. My answer is yes to all the questions below. Yours?

And that brings me to a question: exDuck, what have you done to actually materially assist the poor in your city? have you worked at a learning center to help kids reading 2 or more grade levels below their age group to learn? Fed the poor? even given clothes and household goods you have too much of to the homeless? I would love to see the answers. Until then, I will assume you are a typical idiot mushheaded liberal bigot who can't bring herself to assume the title of liberal bigot.

666 posted on 09/10/2003 10:25:43 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 664 | View Replies]

To: CARepubGal
Post 666? Kewl!
667 posted on 09/10/2003 10:26:21 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

Comment #668 Removed by Moderator

To: exduck
And did you do it for brownie points at church or simply to help out? Seriously, you are a shallow critter and your fruits of the spirit are pretty rancid. Going to start up a debate from a point of acrimony then whining about the reaction from ONE Calvinist will make Screwtape happy, not Jesus.
669 posted on 09/10/2003 10:29:01 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

Comment #670 Removed by Moderator

To: exduck
Umm exactly what is your issue with Calvinism then? Some Calvinist cut you off on the freeway or take your man? Or do you want to troll for a reaction? Somewhat inconsistent of you isn't it?
671 posted on 09/10/2003 10:38:32 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

Comment #672 Removed by Moderator

To: CARepubGal
Do I get a vote? Trolling for reaction would be my guess. Especially since the L'Enfant Provocateur can not differentiate between Calvinists and Wesleyans.
673 posted on 09/10/2003 10:52:21 PM PDT by snerkel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies]

To: exduck; rdb3; Jean Chauvin; Wrigley
Not upset but baffled. The wierd ideas about Calvinists (racist does not compute and come from a sort of ignorance. To get to your point regarding Apartheid: the Afrikaners were totally cut off from any other Europeans for a rather long time. That would include the Afrikaner Church: the isolation allowed evil to overtake their church and society. Apartheid itself was created by depraved humans who justified their actions by pulling verses out of context from the Bible. The Afrikaners viewed in context are a cult. Dutch people OTOH are quite cool (and they Klompen dance too) ;-)
674 posted on 09/10/2003 11:03:50 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: snerkel
I am somewhere between ignorance (non denoms teach wierd things about denominations) and trolling. :-)
675 posted on 09/10/2003 11:04:55 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

Comment #676 Removed by Moderator

To: exduck
Works are useless without grace. Our works are like a toddler fingerpainting the wall and then presenting the art to Michelangelo. Cute but not in the same league. Denominations are a good way to learn more about our relationship to God and help deepen our faith.

On that note, off to sleep.

677 posted on 09/10/2003 11:09:08 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

Comment #678 Removed by Moderator

To: Gamecock
But those of the S. Baptist variety have an oath they take NOT to drink. They can lose their endorsement if they do so. They have the right to drink as Americans, but the S. Baptists have the right to say who gets to represent them in the US Military as a S. Baptist Chaplain.

I suppose you can see their dilemma.

679 posted on 09/10/2003 11:29:56 PM PDT by xzins (In the beginning was the Word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
It's not about deceiving anyone, Rn. It's about having a different view on some things. Imo, a denomination has 20 doctrinal points and you modify one....that doesn't make you a deceiver; it makes you a Christian.

I've heard the local baptist church grows by splitting over their differences.

I think Arminians are fairly consistent in their positions about free will. You hear pretty much the same arguments.
680 posted on 09/10/2003 11:38:07 PM PDT by xzins (In the beginning was the Word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 781-787 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson