Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
If indeed it is a "quote" and not just a coincidence that the same phrase is used, how do you know Paul quoted Luke and not the other way around?

The gospel of Luke and Acts are believed written 60-62 AD. The Letter(gospel) having been written first.

Paul wrote Timothy and Titus after his realease from prison 62-64AD

The letter written by Luke would have had wide circulation.

There are some that believe that Pauls use of the word "scripture" in that passage is meant for both the OT quote and Luke...But that is not as important a point as the fact he quoted it with authority

347 posted on 07/02/2003 8:46:50 AM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7
Well, I'm not convinced that it's a quotation to begin with, and a chain of historical events has to line up just right for your theory to work. It's a lot simpler to jsut accept the canon cause the Church canonized it.

SD

352 posted on 07/02/2003 8:57:58 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson